53 research outputs found
Proceedings of Abstracts Engineering and Computer Science Research Conference 2019
© 2019 The Author(s). This is an open-access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. For further details please see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Note: Keynote: Fluorescence visualisation to evaluate effectiveness of personal protective equipment for infection control is © 2019 Crown copyright and so is licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Under this licence users are permitted to copy, publish, distribute and transmit the Information; adapt the Information; exploit the Information commercially and non-commercially for example, by combining it with other Information, or by including it in your own product or application. Where you do any of the above you must acknowledge the source of the Information in your product or application by including or linking to any attribution statement specified by the Information Provider(s) and, where possible, provide a link to this licence: http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/This book is the record of abstracts submitted and accepted for presentation at the Inaugural Engineering and Computer Science Research Conference held 17th April 2019 at the University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK. This conference is a local event aiming at bringing together the research students, staff and eminent external guests to celebrate Engineering and Computer Science Research at the University of Hertfordshire. The ECS Research Conference aims to showcase the broad landscape of research taking place in the School of Engineering and Computer Science. The 2019 conference was articulated around three topical cross-disciplinary themes: Make and Preserve the Future; Connect the People and Cities; and Protect and Care
Legal Myths of Ebola Preparedness and Response
In March 2014, Ebola viral disease (âEVDâ) emerged from several
West African countries as a substantial threat to global health.
Through a series of core legal powers pursuant to its declaration of a
public health emergency of international concern (âPHEICâ) on
August 8, 2014, the World Health Organization (âWHOâ) averted a
global health disaster by requiring member countries to engage in mul- tiple public health interventions. These efficacious WHO-mandated
measures included implementation of border closures to limit the
spread of EVD within and outside of countries like Guinea, Liberia,
Senegal, and Sierra Leone. Industrialized nations, including the
United States, responded swiftly as well through their own emergency
declarations. Resulting emergency legal powers enabled strong coordination among federal, state, and local actors to systematically identify
and limit cases. Among these powers, the federal Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (âCDCâ) required state and local governments
to follow its national guidance on quarantine and isolation procedures
for persons exposed to or infected with EVD. This led to the justified
quarantine of health care workers (âHCWsâ) returning from treating
Ebola patients in West African âhot zones.â In collaboration with
CDC, U.S. Customs and Border Control agents screened thousands of
incoming passengers at multiple domestic airports to find and contain
numerous, potential cases of EVD. The Food and Drug Administra- tion (âFDAâ) worked in real-time to authorize the use of an extensive
array of experimental tests or drugs proven effective in identifying cases
and treating EVD patients. These (and other) legally-supported
efforts worked in unison to control the
impacts, and protect the publicâs health
Legal Myths of Ebola Preparedness and Response
In March 2014, Ebola viral disease (âEVDâ) emerged from several
West African countries as a substantial threat to global health.
Through a series of core legal powers pursuant to its declaration of a
public health emergency of international concern (âPHEICâ) on
August 8, 2014, the World Health Organization (âWHOâ) averted a
global health disaster by requiring member countries to engage in mul- tiple public health interventions. These efficacious WHO-mandated
measures included implementation of border closures to limit the
spread of EVD within and outside of countries like Guinea, Liberia,
Senegal, and Sierra Leone. Industrialized nations, including the
United States, responded swiftly as well through their own emergency
declarations. Resulting emergency legal powers enabled strong coordination among federal, state, and local actors to systematically identify
and limit cases. Among these powers, the federal Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (âCDCâ) required state and local governments
to follow its national guidance on quarantine and isolation procedures
for persons exposed to or infected with EVD. This led to the justified
quarantine of health care workers (âHCWsâ) returning from treating
Ebola patients in West African âhot zones.â In collaboration with
CDC, U.S. Customs and Border Control agents screened thousands of
incoming passengers at multiple domestic airports to find and contain
numerous, potential cases of EVD. The Food and Drug Administra- tion (âFDAâ) worked in real-time to authorize the use of an extensive
array of experimental tests or drugs proven effective in identifying cases
and treating EVD patients. These (and other) legally-supported
efforts worked in unison to control the
impacts, and protect the publicâs health
Whose Heritage?
This edited collection challenges and re-imagines what is âheritageâ in Britain as a globalised, vernacular, cosmopolitan âpost-nationâ. It takes its inspiration from the foundational work of public intellectual Stuart Hall (1932-2014).
Hall was instrumental in calling out embedded elitist conceptions of âThe Heritageâ of Britain. The bookâs authors challenge us to reconsider what is valued about Britainâs past, its culture and its citizens. Populist discourses around the world, including Brexit and âculture warâ declarations in the UK, demonstrate how heritage and ideas of the past are mobilised in racist politics. The multidisciplinary chapters of this book offer critical inspections of these politics, and dig deeply into the problems of theory, policy and practice in todayâs academia, society and heritage sector. The volume challenges the lack of action since Hall rebuked âThe Heritageâ twenty years ago. The authors featured here are predominantly Black Britons, academics and practitioners engaged in culture and heritage, spurred by the killing of George Floyd and the rise of the Black Lives Matter movement to contest racist practices and structures that support them.
The primary audience will be academics, but it will also attract culture sector practitioners and heritage institutions. However, the book is particularly aimed at scholars and community members who identify as Black, who are centrally concerned with questions of identity and race in British society. Its Open Access status will facilitate access to the book by all groups in society
Whose Heritage?
This edited collection challenges and re-imagines what is âheritageâ in Britain as a globalised, vernacular, cosmopolitan âpost-nationâ. It takes its inspiration from the foundational work of public intellectual Stuart Hall (1932-2014).
Hall was instrumental in calling out embedded elitist conceptions of âThe Heritageâ of Britain. The bookâs authors challenge us to reconsider what is valued about Britainâs past, its culture and its citizens. Populist discourses around the world, including Brexit and âculture warâ declarations in the UK, demonstrate how heritage and ideas of the past are mobilised in racist politics. The multidisciplinary chapters of this book offer critical inspections of these politics, and dig deeply into the problems of theory, policy and practice in todayâs academia, society and heritage sector. The volume challenges the lack of action since Hall rebuked âThe Heritageâ twenty years ago. The authors featured here are predominantly Black Britons, academics and practitioners engaged in culture and heritage, spurred by the killing of George Floyd and the rise of the Black Lives Matter movement to contest racist practices and structures that support them.
The primary audience will be academics, but it will also attract culture sector practitioners and heritage institutions. However, the book is particularly aimed at scholars and community members who identify as Black, who are centrally concerned with questions of identity and race in British society. Its Open Access status will facilitate access to the book by all groups in society
Contributions to Desktop Grid Computing : From High Throughput Computing to Data-Intensive Sciences on Hybrid Distributed Computing Infrastructures
Since the mid 90âs, Desktop Grid Computing - i.e the idea of using a large number of remote PCs distributed on the Internet to execute large parallel applications - has proved to be an efficient paradigm to provide a large computational power at the fraction of the cost of a dedicated computing infrastructure.This document presents my contributions over the last decade to broaden the scope of Desktop Grid Computing. My research has followed three different directions. The first direction has established new methods to observe and characterize Desktop Grid resources and developed experimental platforms to test and validate our approach in conditions close to reality. The second line of research has focused on integrating Desk- top Grids in e-science Grid infrastructure (e.g. EGI), which requires to address many challenges such as security, scheduling, quality of service, and more. The third direction has investigated how to support large-scale data management and data intensive applica- tions on such infrastructures, including support for the new and emerging data-oriented programming models.This manuscript not only reports on the scientific achievements and the technologies developed to support our objectives, but also on the international collaborations and projects I have been involved in, as well as the scientific mentoring which motivates my candidature for the Habilitation `a Diriger les Recherches
Two Ethnographic Case Studies of Response to Intervention
Response to Intervention (RtI) is being implemented in classrooms across the nation as a method of strengthening instruction and an option for replacing the severe discrepancy model in the identification of Learning Disability (LD). This study explores two teachersâ understandings of the construct of LD and describes implementation of RtI in their classrooms. These two ethnographic case studies allow data triangulation of archival documents and pre-research events, classroom observations, and teacher interviews. The implementation of the RtI policy was interpreted by the teachers and interrupted by First to the Top, but the explanatory ethnographic case studies provide a classroom level glimpse of RtI that is missing in the literature
- âŠ