4,008 research outputs found
PhEmaterialism: Response-able Research & Pedagogy
This Special Issue offers PhEmaterialisms as a way to explore the world asvital and complex, while simultaneously being response-able to the multiple ethical imperatives of late-stage capitalism. We argue that PhEmaterialist thinking and practices can help us grapple with growing educational complexities, enabling strategies toresist and create alternatives to the patterns of injustice occurring across the world, from burgeoning ethno-nationalist and neo-fascist political movements, to rising global poverty levels, to massive population displacements, to environmental degradation, to toxic internet movements grounded in misogyny, homophobia, transphobia, and xenophobia (Strom & Martin, 2017a). To understand, enquire into, and generate action worthy of the complexity of our times requires a fundamental shift in our thinking and research practice. This shift disrupts the foundational logic on which dominant thinking in education (and indeed, all Western society) is based—humanism and anthropocentrism (Braidotti, 2013; Murris, 2016; Snaza et al, 2014). Instead, we argue that we need to put theories/concepts to work in education and educational research which can better account for the multiple, entangled, ever-shifting, difference-rich nature of processes of teaching, learning, schooling, and activism. For this work, we also draw on a rich feminist legacy attentive to unequal power relations (e.g., Ahmed, 1998; Anzaldua, 1999; hooks, 1994; Spivak, 1978), and our critical approach to rethinking Vitruvian “man” is especially informed by posthuman/new materialist feminist thinkings and thinkers, including Rosi Braidotti, Donna Haraway, and Karen Barad
Connection Magazine, Fall 2021
https://surface.syr.edu/connection/1049/thumbnail.jp
PhEMaterialism: Response-able Research & Activism
This Special Issue offers PhEmaterialisms as a way to explore the world asvital and complex, while simultaneously being response-able to the multiple ethical imperatives of late-stage capitalism. We argue that PhEmaterialist thinking and practices can help us grapple with growing educational complexities, enabling strategies toresist and create alternatives to the patterns of injustice occurring across the world, from burgeoning ethno-nationalist and neo-fascist political movements, to rising global poverty levels, to massive population displacements, to environmental degradation, to toxic internet movements grounded in misogyny, homophobia, transphobia, and xenophobia (Strom & Martin, 2017a). To understand, enquire into, and generate action worthy of the complexity of our times requires a fundamental shift in our thinking and research practice. This shift disrupts the foundational logic on which dominant thinking in education (and indeed, all Western society) is based—humanism and anthropocentrism (Braidotti, 2013; Murris, 2016; Snaza et al, 2014). Instead, we argue that we need to put theories/concepts to work in education and educational research which can better account for the multiple, entangled, ever-shifting, difference-rich nature of processes of teaching, learning, schooling, and activism. For this work, we also draw on a rich feminist legacy attentive to unequal power relations (e.g., Ahmed, 1998; Anzaldua, 1999; hooks, 1994; Spivak, 1978), and our critical approach to rethinking Vitruvian “man” is especially informed by posthuman/new materialist feminist thinkings and thinkers, including Rosi Braidotti, Donna Haraway, and Karen Barad
Recommended from our members
Strategies and tactics in academic knowledge production by multilingual scholars
In the past decade, academic evaluation systems worldwide have markedly increased the use of mechanisms that privilege the use of English in journal publishing. In the context of these trends, this article highlights our findings from more than 12 years of research on the experiences and perspectives of 50 multilingual European scholars with writing for publication, particularly in English. We draw on de Certeau’s (1984) notions of strategies and tactics to explore key ways in which scholars manage often-competing demands and interests in writing for publication. Scholars both adopt strategies that align with official publication policies and use tactics that support scholars’ sometimes competing agendas. At different moments scholars embrace, accommodate, or resist the perceived dominance of English in knowledge production regimes and evaluation systems. We conclude by summarizing the value of drawing on the notions of strategy and tactics in an era of increasing debates over evaluation systems
EstratĂ©gias e táticas na produção de conhecimento acadĂŞmico para pesquisadores multilĂngĂĽes
In the past decade, academic evaluation systems worldwide have markedly increased the use of mechanisms that privilege the use of English in journal publishing. In the context of these trends, this article highlights our findings from more than 12 years of research on the experiences and perspectives of 50 multilingual European scholars with writing for publication, particularly in English. We draw on de Certeau’s (1984) notions of strategies and tactics to explore key ways in which scholars manage often-competing demands and interests in writing for publication. Scholars both adopt strategies that align with official publication policies and use tactics that support scholars’ sometimes competing agendas. At different moments scholars embrace, accommodate, or resist the perceived dominance of English in knowledge production regimes and evaluation systems. We conclude by summarizing the value of drawing on the notions of strategy and tactics in an era of increasing debates over evaluation systems.En la Ăşltima dĂ©cada, los sistemas de evaluaciĂłn acadĂ©mica de todo el mundo han aumentado considerablemente el uso de mecanismos que privilegian el uso de InglĂ©s en la publicaciĂłn de revistas acadĂ©micas. En el contexto de estas tendencias, este artĂculo resalta los hallazgos de más de 12 años de investigaciĂłn sobre las experiencias y perspectivas de 50 investigadores europeos multilingĂĽes sobre la escritura para la publicaciĂłn, sobre todo en InglĂ©s. Nos basamos en las nociones de De Certeau  de estrategias y tácticas (1984) para explorar formas clave en que los investigadores gestionan demandas e intereses que a menudo compiten en la escritura para publicaciĂłn. Los investigadores tanto adoptan estrategias que se alinean con las polĂticas de publicaciĂłn oficial y usan tácticas que a veces compiten con sus agendas de investigaciĂłn. En diferentes momentos los investigadores adoptan, dan cabida, o se resisten a la dominaciĂłn percibida del idioma InglĂ©s en los regĂmenes de producciĂłn de conocimiento y sistemas de evaluaciĂłn. Concluimos resumiendo el valor de recurrir a las nociones de estrategia y táctica en una era de creciente debate sobre los sistemas de evaluaciĂłn .Na Ăşltima dĂ©cada, nos sistemas de avaliação de acadĂŞmicos de todo o mundo aumentou consideravelmente o uso de mecanismos que favoreçam o uso de InglĂŞs na publicação de revistas acadĂŞmicas. No contexto dessas tendĂŞncias, este artigo destaca os resultados de mais de 12 anos de pesquisa sobre as experiĂŞncias e perspectivas de 50 investigadores europeus multilingues sobre como escrever para a publicação , principalmente em InglĂŞs. Contamos com as noções de De Certeau das estratĂ©gias e táticas (1984) para explorar maneiras principais em que os pesquisadores gerem demandas e interesses, muitas vezes concorrentes, na escrita para a publicação. Os pesquisadores adotam estratĂ©gias alinhadas com as polĂticas oficiais de publicação e usam táticas que Ă s vezes competem com suas agendas de investigação. Em momentos diferentes pesquisadores adotam, acomodam ou resistem Ă dominação percebida do InglĂŞs nos regimes de sistemas de produção e avaliação do conhecimento. Conclui-se por indicar o valor de usar os conceitos de estratĂ©gia e tática em uma era de crescente debate sobre os sistemas de avaliação
Graph Signal Processing: Overview, Challenges and Applications
Research in Graph Signal Processing (GSP) aims to develop tools for
processing data defined on irregular graph domains. In this paper we first
provide an overview of core ideas in GSP and their connection to conventional
digital signal processing. We then summarize recent developments in developing
basic GSP tools, including methods for sampling, filtering or graph learning.
Next, we review progress in several application areas using GSP, including
processing and analysis of sensor network data, biological data, and
applications to image processing and machine learning. We finish by providing a
brief historical perspective to highlight how concepts recently developed in
GSP build on top of prior research in other areas.Comment: To appear, Proceedings of the IEE
UA11 Brag Sheet Update
Newsletter highlighting WKU faculty and staff activities for the 1996-97 academic year
Recommended from our members
Context-awareness for mobile sensing: a survey and future directions
The evolution of smartphones together with increasing computational power have empowered developers to create innovative context-aware applications for recognizing user related social and cognitive activities in any situation and at any location. The existence and awareness of the context provides the capability of being conscious of physical environments or situations around mobile device users. This allows network services to respond proactively and intelligently based on such awareness. The key idea behind context-aware applications is to encourage users to collect, analyze and share local sensory knowledge in the purpose for a large scale community use by creating a smart network. The desired network is capable of making autonomous logical decisions to actuate environmental objects, and also assist individuals. However, many open challenges remain, which are mostly arisen due to the middleware services provided in mobile devices have limited resources in terms of power, memory and bandwidth. Thus, it becomes critically important to study how the drawbacks can be elaborated and resolved, and at the same time better understand the opportunities for the research community to contribute to the context-awareness. To this end, this paper surveys the literature over the period of 1991-2014 from the emerging concepts to applications of context-awareness in mobile platforms by providing up-to-date research and future research directions. Moreover, it points out the challenges faced in this regard and enlighten them by proposing possible solutions
- …