18 research outputs found

    Innovative Model Based Systems Engineering approach for the design of hypersonic transportation systems

    Get PDF
    L'abstract è presente nell'allegato / the abstract is in the attachmen

    Aesthetic Values of Five Primary Wood Transporting Methods Common to Northern New England

    Get PDF
    Throughout northern New England and across the country, increasing populations and the exurbanization of rural forested landscapes have had a tremendous impact on forest management. As forested areas become more populated, society has become more exposed to the sights and sounds associated with different forest operations. As a result, aesthetics are increasingly driving public reaction to and concern about forestry practices, especially timber harvesting. How people perceive forestry harvesting can be significant in defining the future of forest management, particularly in more populated woodlands. The objective of this study was to better understanding public values as they relate to timber harvesting, especially as it occurs in forested residential areas and other places where people come in contact with working forests. Our goal was to develop information that will help NIPF owners and foresters better fit timber harvesting into the flow of community life, with all of its constraints, rather than to expect communities to adjust to the temporary inconveniences often associated with the conduct of logging. By utilizing videography, media editing technology, focus groups, and a written survey, this research was able to assess and compare the visual and aural qualities of five timber harvest yarding methods based on a battery of attributes and situations. The operations evaluated consisted of a forwarder, a rubber-tired cable skidder, a bulldozer, a farm tractor, and a workhorse. This study was successful in clarifying the aesthetic preferences of these yarding methods among a subsample of the general public, as well as among members of forestland owners associations in the northern New England region. In addition, this study investigated the relationships between several possible explanatory variables (e.g., age, education) and respondents’ preferences for the logging methods studied. Throughout much of the video survey, response patterns were very similar between the general public, represented by students, and landowners, represented by landowner group association members. Though acceptability ratings and preference rankings of the timber harvest yarding methods were similar, statistical tests (e.g., chi-square analysis, polytomous logistic regression, and repeated measures analysis of variance) revealed significant differences that existed between the two populations

    35th Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science: STACS 2018, February 28-March 3, 2018, Caen, France

    Get PDF

    Critical engineering pedagogy: curricular peer mentoring as a case study for change in the Canadian neoliberal university

    Get PDF
    This research explores themes of pedagogy, change, and agency within education systems, by examining the possibility of changing a pedagogical discourse within an undergraduate engineering program through critical pedagogy. Changing that discourse is necessary because engineering, as engineers themselves acknowledge, cannot remain an exclusionary space given its crucial role in shaping our postmodern world. This world is full of tensions: it is defined by a pervasive neoliberalism that values technical knowledge for its commercial utility; however, it also values human rights, social responsibility, and environmental stewardship. If engineering education only focuses on training students to solve technical problems, it risks producing engineering professionals who are unwilling to reflect on, and lack the agency to address, the effects of engineering on individuals, society, and the environment. To address these concerns, this study piloted a peer-based learning program that ran in an undergraduate engineering program at a Canadian university for one semester, returning rich qualitative data on implementing a change process within engineering education. The pilot program was informed by critical pedagogy, and attempted to introduce a specific model of undergraduate peer mentoring, known as curricular peer mentoring, within engineering education to question exclusionary discourses. Therefore, the pilot program primarily acted as a case study into implementing a pedagogical change within engineering education at a program and faculty-level. However, the case study was also used to assess whether introducing curricular peer mentoring within university education generally might produce graduates who are critical thinkers, and able to engage in the academic, professional, and civic discourses within and beyond their chosen fields of study and practice. This is a pressing issue of contemporary university education, for as we enter the ‗Post-Truth Era‖ there is an urgent need to train university graduates to think critically, so they can effectively evaluate social, political, and economic discourses. Finally, as the wider university continues to be impacted by a neoliberal agenda that curtails their agency and shapes their pedagogies, research, and organizational structures, they too must change. The pilot program also provided an exploration of a change process that challenges that neoliberal discourse, while at the same time existing within it

    Guaranteeing Timing Requirements in the IXV On-Board Software

    No full text
    corecore