The Family of MapReduce and Large Scale Data Processing Systems

In the last two decades, the continuous increase of computational power has produced an overwhelming flow of data which has called for a paradigm shift in the computing architecture and large scale data processing mechanisms. MapReduce is a simple and powerful programming model that enables easy development of scalable parallel applications to process vast amounts of data on large clusters of commodity machines. It isolates the application from the details of running a distributed program such as issues on data distribution, scheduling and fault tolerance. However, the original implementation of the MapReduce framework had some limitations that have been tackled by many research efforts in several followup works after its introduction. This article provides a comprehensive survey for a family of approaches and mechanisms of large scale data processing mechanisms that have been implemented based on the original idea of the MapReduce framework and are currently gaining a lot of momentum in both research and industrial communities. We also cover a set of introduced systems that have been implemented to provide declarative programming interfaces on top of the MapReduce framework. In addition, we review several large scale data processing systems that resemble some of the ideas of the MapReduce framework for different purposes and application scenarios. Finally, we discuss some of the future research directions for implementing the next generation of MapReduce-like solutions.Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1105.4252 by other author

Deep Data Locality on Apache Hadoop

The amount of data being collected in various areas such as social media, network, scientific instrument, mobile devices, and sensors is growing continuously, and the technology to process them is also advancing rapidly. One of the fundamental technologies to process big data is Apache Hadoop that has been adopted by many commercial products, such as InfoSphere by IBM, or Spark by Cloudera. MapReduce on Hadoop has been widely used in many data science applications. As a dominant big data processing platform, the performance of MapReduce on Hadoop system has a significant impact on the big data processing capability across multiple industries. Most of the research for improving the speed of big data analysis has been on Hadoop modules such as Hadoop common, Hadoop Distribute File System (HDFS), Hadoop Yet Another Resource Negotiator (YARN) and Hadoop MapReduce. In this research, we focused on data locality on HDFS to improve the performance of MapReduce. To reduce the amount of data transfer, MapReduce has been utilizing data locality. However, even though the majority of the processing cost occurs in the later stages, data locality has been utilized only in the early stages, which we call Shallow Data Locality (SDL). As a result, the benefit of data locality has not been fully realized. We have explored a new concept called Deep Data Locality (DDL) where the data is pre-arranged to maximize the locality in the later stages. Specifically, we introduce two implementation methods of the DDL, i.e., block-based DDL and key-based DDL. In block-based DDL, the data blocks are pre-arranged to reduce the block copying time in two ways. First the RLM blocks are eliminated. Under the conventional default block placement policy (DBPP), data blocks are randomly placed on any available slave nodes, requiring a copy of RLM (Rack-Local Map) blocks. In block-based DDL, blocks are placed to avoid RLMs to reduce the block copy time. Second, block-based DDL concentrates the blocks in a smaller number of nodes and reduces the data transfer time among them. We analyzed the block distribution status with the customer review data from TripAdvisor and measured the performances with Terasort Benchmark. Our test result shows that the execution times of Map and Shuffle have been improved by up to 25% and 31% respectively. In key-based DDL, the input data is divided into several blocks and stored in HDFS before going into the Map stage. In comparison with conventional blocks that have random keys, our blocks have a unique key. This requires a pre-sorting of the key-value pairs, which can be done during ETL process. This eliminates some data movements in map, shuffle, and reduce stages, and thereby improves the performance. In our experiments, MapReduce with key-based DDL performed 21.9% faster than default MapReduce and 13.3% faster than MapReduce with block-based DDL. Additionally, key-based DDL can be combined with other methods to further improve the performance. When key-based DDL and block-based DDL are combined, the Hadoop performance went up by 34.4%. In this research, we developed the MapReduce workflow models with a novel computational model. We developed a numerical simulator that integrates the computational models. The model faithfully predicts the Hadoop performance under various conditions

Embed and Conquer: Scalable Embeddings for Kernel k-Means on MapReduce

The kernel $k$-means is an effective method for data clustering which extends the commonly-used $k$-means algorithm to work on a similarity matrix over complex data structures. The kernel $k$-means algorithm is however computationally very complex as it requires the complete data matrix to be calculated and stored. Further, the kernelized nature of the kernel $k$-means algorithm hinders the parallelization of its computations on modern infrastructures for distributed computing. In this paper, we are defining a family of kernel-based low-dimensional embeddings that allows for scaling kernel $k$-means on MapReduce via an efficient and unified parallelization strategy. Afterwards, we propose two methods for low-dimensional embedding that adhere to our definition of the embedding family. Exploiting the proposed parallelization strategy, we present two scalable MapReduce algorithms for kernel $k$-means. We demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed algorithms through an empirical evaluation on benchmark data sets.Comment: Appears in Proceedings of the SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (SDM), 201

A Design Framework for Efficient Distributed Analytics on Structured Big Data

Distributed analytics architectures are often comprised of two elements: a compute engine and a storage system. Conventional distributed storage systems usually store data in the form of files or key-value pairs. This abstraction simplifies how the data is accessed and reasoned about by an application developer. However, the separation of compute and storage systems makes it difficult to optimize costly disk and network operations. By design the storage system is isolated from the workload and its performance requirements such as block co-location and replication. Furthermore, optimizing fine-grained data access requests becomes difficult as the storage layer is hidden away behind such abstractions. Using a clean slate approach, this thesis proposes a modular distributed analytics system design which is centered around a unified interface for distributed data objects named the DDO. The interface couples key mechanisms that utilize storage, memory, and compute resources. This coupling makes it ideal to optimize data access requests across all memory hierarchy levels, with respect to the workload and its performance requirements. In addition to the DDO, a complementary DDO controller implementation controls the logical view of DDOs, their replication, and distribution across the cluster. A proof-of-concept implementation shows improvement in mean query time by 3-6x on the TPC-H and TPC-DS benchmarks, and more than an order of magnitude improvement in many cases

A Survey on Job and Task Scheduling in Big Data

Bigdata handles the datasets which exceeds the ability of commonly used software tools for storing, sharing and processing the data. Classification of workload is a major issue to the Big Data community namely job type evolution and job size evolution. On the basis of job type, job size and disk performance, clusters are been formed with data node, name node and secondary name node. To classify the workload and to perform the job scheduling, mapreduce algorithm is going to be applied. Based on the performance of individual machine, workload has been allocated. Mapreduce has two phases for processing the data: map and reduce phases. In map phase, the input dataset taken is splitted into keyvalue pairs and an intermediate output is obtained and in reduce phase that key value pair undergoes shuffle and sort operation. Intermediate files are created from map tasks are written to local disk and output files are written to distributed file system of Hadoop. Scheduling of different jobs to different disks are identified after completing mapreduce tasks. Johnson algorithm is used to schedule the jobs and used to find out the optimal solution of different jobs. It schedules the jobs into different pools and performs the scheduling. The main task to be carried out is to minimize the computation time for entire jobs and analyze the performance using response time factors in hadoop distributed file system. Based on the dataset size and number of nodes which is formed in hadoop cluster, the performance of individual jobs are identified\ud Keywords — \ud hadoop; mapreduce; johnson algorith