An OpenEaagles Framework Extension for Hardware-in-the-Loop Swarm Simulation

Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) swarm applications, algorithms, and control strategies have experienced steady growth and development over the past 15 years. Yet, to this day, most swarm development efforts have gone untested and thus unimplemented. Cost of aircraft systems, government imposed airspace restrictions, and the lack of adequate modeling and simulation tools are some of the major inhibitors to successful swarm implementation. This thesis examines how the OpenEaagles simulation framework can be extended to bridge this gap. This research aims to utilize Hardware-in-the-Loop (HIL) simulation to provide developers a functional capability to develop and test the behaviors of scalable and modular swarms of autonomous UAVs in simulation with high confidence that these behaviors will prop- agate to real/live ight tests. Demonstrations show the framework enhances and simplifies swarm development through encapsulation, possesses high modularity, pro- vides realistic aircraft modeling, and is capable of simultaneously accommodating four hardware-piloted swarming UAVs during HIL simulation or 64 swarming UAVs during pure simulation

Design of an UAV swarm

This master thesis tries to give an overview on the general aspects involved in the design of an UAV swarm. UAV swarms are continuoulsy gaining popularity amongst researchers and UAV manufacturers, since they allow greater success rates in task accomplishing with reduced times. Appart from this, multiple UAVs cooperating between them opens a new field of missions that can only be carried in this way. All the topics explained within this master thesis will explain all the agents involved in the design of an UAV swarm, from the communication protocols between them, navigation and trajectory analysis and task allocation

Swarming Reconnaissance Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in a Parallel Discrete Event Simulation

Current military affairs indicate that future military warfare requires safer, more accurate, and more fault-tolerant weapons systems. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) are one answer to this military requirement. Technology in the UAV arena is moving toward smaller and more capable systems and is becoming available at a fraction of the cost. Exploiting the advances in these miniaturized flying vehicles is the aim of this research. How are the UAVs employed for the future military? The concept of operations for a micro-UAV system is adopted from nature from the appearance of flocking birds, movement of a school of fish, and swarming bees among others. All of these natural phenomena have a common thread: a global action resulting from many small individual actions. This emergent behavior is the aggregate result of many simple interactions occurring within the flock, school, or swarm. In a similar manner, a more robust weapon system uses emergent behavior resulting in no weakest link because the system itself is made up of simple interactions by hundreds or thousands of homogeneous UAVs. The global system in this research is referred to as a swarm. Losing one or a few individual unmanned vehicles would not dramatically impact the swarms ability to complete the mission or cause harm to any human operator. Swarming reconnaissance is the emergent behavior of swarms to perform a reconnaissance operation. An in-depth look at the design of a reconnaissance swarming mission is studied. A taxonomy of passive reconnaissance applications is developed to address feasibility. Evaluation of algorithms for swarm movement, communication, sensor input/analysis, targeting, and network topology result in priorities of each model\u27s desired features. After a thorough selection process of available implementations, a subset of those models are integrated and built upon resulting in a simulation that explores the innovations of swarming UAVs

Swarm Based Implementation of a Virtual Distributed Database System in a Sensor Network

The deployment of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in recent military operations has had success in carrying out surveillance and combat missions in sensitive areas. An area of intense research on UAVs has been on controlling a group of small-sized UAVs to carry out reconnaissance missions normally undertaken by large UAVs such as Predator or Global Hawk. A control strategy for coordinating the UAV movements of such a group of UAVs adopts the bio-inspired swarm model to produce autonomous group behavior. This research proposes establishing a distributed database system on a group of swarming UAVs, providing for data storage during a reconnaissance mission. A distributed database system model is simulated treating each UAV as a distributed database site connected by a wireless network. In this model, each UAV carries a sensor and communicates to a command center when queried. Drawing equivalence to a sensor network, the network of UAVs poses as a dynamic ad-hoc sensor network. The distributed database system based on a swarm of UAVs is tested against a set of reconnaissance test suites with respect to evaluating system performance. The design of experiments focuses on the effects of varying the query input and types of swarming UAVs on overall system performance. The results show that the topology of the UAVs has a distinct impact on the output of the sensor database. The experiments measuring system delays also confirm the expectation that in a distributed system, inter-node communication costs outweigh processing costs

Trajectory Optimization of Meteorological Sampling

Swarming involves controlling multiple unmanned aerial systems or UAS in formation through the use of controls and algorithms. Swarm systems may be distributed and not rely on a central controller. As a result, this gives the system the potential to be robust and scalable, allowing for flexibility for the engineers to approach problems differently. Based on a variety of a few models and algorithms, such as artificial potential fields (APFs), agent-based modeling, dynamic data driven application systems (DDDAS), and virtual structures, it may be determined that using a variation of one of these would be the best course of action for formation flight for a swarm of UASs. Choosing the right controller is dependent on what works best for acquiring atmospheric data in a coordinated formation. Current atmospheric data is commonly taken using a weather tower or mesonet. A mesonet is typically a 10m high tower with a pressure, temperature, humidity sensor placed at the top. Deciding which controller can be used to not only take useful atmospheric data, but in many cases replace a mesonet due to mobility and customization is the goal. A wind profile is a transient matter, so using a swarm vs using one drone or a mesonet helps to solve the issues that the latter two run into due to time and space. A swarm can record multiple points at one time due to each agent being a data point representation, whereas a single drone can only account for a single location in time. A swarm using a virtual structure (VS) can cover a variety of amounts of space in a coordinated shape. A meosnet is stationary and only oriented vertically and an uncoordinated group of UAS does not have the capability to operate together. This leaves the capability that a VS swarm has to fill in the gaps or even replace the traditional approaches. An array of sensor packages with mobility, coordinated movement, and endless data points could give the VS swarm the advantage in atmospheric data sampling

Motion Planning of UAV Swarm: Recent Challenges and Approaches

The unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) swarm is gaining massive interest for researchers as it has huge significance over a single UAV. Many studies focus only on a few challenges of this complex multidisciplinary group. Most of them have certain limitations. This paper aims to recognize and arrange relevant research for evaluating motion planning techniques and models for a swarm from the viewpoint of control, path planning, architecture, communication, monitoring and tracking, and safety issues. Then, a state-of-the-art understanding of the UAV swarm and an overview of swarm intelligence (SI) are provided in this research. Multiple challenges are considered, and some approaches are presented. Findings show that swarm intelligence is leading in this era and is the most significant approach for UAV swarm that offers distinct contributions in different environments. This integration of studies will serve as a basis for knowledge concerning swarm, create guidelines for motion planning issues, and strengthens support for existing methods. Moreover, this paper possesses the capacity to engender new strategies that can serve as the grounds for future work

Verification of Autonomous Systems: Developmental Test and Evaluation of an Autonomous UAS Swarming Algorithm Combining Simulation, Formulation and Live Flight

This research was driven by the increase of autonomous systems in the current millennium and the challenging nature of testing and evaluating their performance. A review of the current literature revealed proposed methods for verifying autonomous systems, but few implementations. It exposed several gaps in the current verification and validation methods and suggested goals for filling them. Through the use of modeling, software in the loop (SITL), and flight test, this research verified an autonomous swarming algorithm for unmanned aerial systems (UAS) and validated an exemplar of a testing framework. Thirteen sets of three-vehicle swarm data produced over two days of flight testing provided a baseline algorithm analysis. During these tests, vehicle separation distances deviated an average of 5.61 meters from the ideal state, with separation distance violations \u3c 6:39% of the time. The swarm achieved a 0.27 m average deviation and 0.43% violation in the best cases. Average packet loss between vehicles was 4.94% at a 5 Hz update rate, with an optimal communication lag \u3c 0:04 seconds. The multi-faceted empirical analysis created through the pairing of qualitative and quantitative analysis provided a complete understanding of vehicle behavior. This analysis also identified various areas of improvement for the algorithm and testing framework. The outcomes of this research formed a baseline testing continuum that is adaptable to a variety of follow-on investigations into formal verification of autonomous systems