17,757 research outputs found
Argumentation Mining in User-Generated Web Discourse
The goal of argumentation mining, an evolving research field in computational
linguistics, is to design methods capable of analyzing people's argumentation.
In this article, we go beyond the state of the art in several ways. (i) We deal
with actual Web data and take up the challenges given by the variety of
registers, multiple domains, and unrestricted noisy user-generated Web
discourse. (ii) We bridge the gap between normative argumentation theories and
argumentation phenomena encountered in actual data by adapting an argumentation
model tested in an extensive annotation study. (iii) We create a new gold
standard corpus (90k tokens in 340 documents) and experiment with several
machine learning methods to identify argument components. We offer the data,
source codes, and annotation guidelines to the community under free licenses.
Our findings show that argumentation mining in user-generated Web discourse is
a feasible but challenging task.Comment: Cite as: Habernal, I. & Gurevych, I. (2017). Argumentation Mining in
User-Generated Web Discourse. Computational Linguistics 43(1), pp. 125-17
Solutions to Detect and Analyze Online Radicalization : A Survey
Online Radicalization (also called Cyber-Terrorism or Extremism or
Cyber-Racism or Cyber- Hate) is widespread and has become a major and growing
concern to the society, governments and law enforcement agencies around the
world. Research shows that various platforms on the Internet (low barrier to
publish content, allows anonymity, provides exposure to millions of users and a
potential of a very quick and widespread diffusion of message) such as YouTube
(a popular video sharing website), Twitter (an online micro-blogging service),
Facebook (a popular social networking website), online discussion forums and
blogosphere are being misused for malicious intent. Such platforms are being
used to form hate groups, racist communities, spread extremist agenda, incite
anger or violence, promote radicalization, recruit members and create virtual
organi- zations and communities. Automatic detection of online radicalization
is a technically challenging problem because of the vast amount of the data,
unstructured and noisy user-generated content, dynamically changing content and
adversary behavior. There are several solutions proposed in the literature
aiming to combat and counter cyber-hate and cyber-extremism. In this survey, we
review solutions to detect and analyze online radicalization. We review 40
papers published at 12 venues from June 2003 to November 2011. We present a
novel classification scheme to classify these papers. We analyze these
techniques, perform trend analysis, discuss limitations of existing techniques
and find out research gaps
Social Media and Information Overload: Survey Results
A UK-based online questionnaire investigating aspects of usage of
user-generated media (UGM), such as Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter, attracted
587 participants. Results show a high degree of engagement with social
networking media such as Facebook, and a significant engagement with other
media such as professional media, microblogs and blogs. Participants who
experience information overload are those who engage less frequently with the
media, rather than those who have fewer posts to read. Professional users show
different behaviours to social users. Microbloggers complain of information
overload to the greatest extent. Two thirds of Twitter-users have felt that
they receive too many posts, and over half of Twitter-users have felt the need
for a tool to filter out the irrelevant posts. Generally speaking, participants
express satisfaction with the media, though a significant minority express a
range of concerns including information overload and privacy
- …