1,640 research outputs found
When Causal Intervention Meets Adversarial Examples and Image Masking for Deep Neural Networks
Discovering and exploiting the causality in deep neural networks (DNNs) are
crucial challenges for understanding and reasoning causal effects (CE) on an
explainable visual model. "Intervention" has been widely used for recognizing a
causal relation ontologically. In this paper, we propose a causal inference
framework for visual reasoning via do-calculus. To study the intervention
effects on pixel-level features for causal reasoning, we introduce pixel-wise
masking and adversarial perturbation. In our framework, CE is calculated using
features in a latent space and perturbed prediction from a DNN-based model. We
further provide the first look into the characteristics of discovered CE of
adversarially perturbed images generated by gradient-based methods
\footnote{~~https://github.com/jjaacckkyy63/Causal-Intervention-AE-wAdvImg}.
Experimental results show that CE is a competitive and robust index for
understanding DNNs when compared with conventional methods such as
class-activation mappings (CAMs) on the Chest X-Ray-14 dataset for
human-interpretable feature(s) (e.g., symptom) reasoning. Moreover, CE holds
promises for detecting adversarial examples as it possesses distinct
characteristics in the presence of adversarial perturbations.Comment: Noted our camera-ready version has changed the title. "When Causal
Intervention Meets Adversarial Examples and Image Masking for Deep Neural
Networks" as the v3 official paper title in IEEE Proceeding. Please use it in
your formal reference. Accepted at IEEE ICIP 2019. Pytorch code has released
on https://github.com/jjaacckkyy63/Causal-Intervention-AE-wAdvIm
A Comprehensive Survey on Trustworthy Graph Neural Networks: Privacy, Robustness, Fairness, and Explainability
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have made rapid developments in the recent
years. Due to their great ability in modeling graph-structured data, GNNs are
vastly used in various applications, including high-stakes scenarios such as
financial analysis, traffic predictions, and drug discovery. Despite their
great potential in benefiting humans in the real world, recent study shows that
GNNs can leak private information, are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, can
inherit and magnify societal bias from training data and lack interpretability,
which have risk of causing unintentional harm to the users and society. For
example, existing works demonstrate that attackers can fool the GNNs to give
the outcome they desire with unnoticeable perturbation on training graph. GNNs
trained on social networks may embed the discrimination in their decision
process, strengthening the undesirable societal bias. Consequently, trustworthy
GNNs in various aspects are emerging to prevent the harm from GNN models and
increase the users' trust in GNNs. In this paper, we give a comprehensive
survey of GNNs in the computational aspects of privacy, robustness, fairness,
and explainability. For each aspect, we give the taxonomy of the related
methods and formulate the general frameworks for the multiple categories of
trustworthy GNNs. We also discuss the future research directions of each aspect
and connections between these aspects to help achieve trustworthiness
Adversarial Attacks and Defenses in Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Survey
Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) methods are portrayed as a remedy
for debugging and trusting statistical and deep learning models, as well as
interpreting their predictions. However, recent advances in adversarial machine
learning (AdvML) highlight the limitations and vulnerabilities of
state-of-the-art explanation methods, putting their security and
trustworthiness into question. The possibility of manipulating, fooling or
fairwashing evidence of the model's reasoning has detrimental consequences when
applied in high-stakes decision-making and knowledge discovery. This survey
provides a comprehensive overview of research concerning adversarial attacks on
explanations of machine learning models, as well as fairness metrics. We
introduce a unified notation and taxonomy of methods facilitating a common
ground for researchers and practitioners from the intersecting research fields
of AdvML and XAI. We discuss how to defend against attacks and design robust
interpretation methods. We contribute a list of existing insecurities in XAI
and outline the emerging research directions in adversarial XAI (AdvXAI).
Future work should address improving explanation methods and evaluation
protocols to take into account the reported safety issues.Comment: A shorter version of this paper was presented at the IJCAI 2023
Workshop on Explainable A
A Survey of Explainable Graph Neural Networks: Taxonomy and Evaluation Metrics
Graph neural networks (GNNs) have demonstrated a significant boost in
prediction performance on graph data. At the same time, the predictions made by
these models are often hard to interpret. In that regard, many efforts have
been made to explain the prediction mechanisms of these models from
perspectives such as GNNExplainer, XGNN and PGExplainer. Although such works
present systematic frameworks to interpret GNNs, a holistic review for
explainable GNNs is unavailable. In this survey, we present a comprehensive
review of explainability techniques developed for GNNs. We focus on explainable
graph neural networks and categorize them based on the use of explainable
methods. We further provide the common performance metrics for GNNs
explanations and point out several future research directions
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): What we know and what is left to attain Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. 2021R1A2C1011198) , (Institute for Information & communications Technology Planning & Evaluation) (IITP) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) under the ICT Creative Consilience Program (IITP-2021-2020-0-01821) , and AI Platform to Fully Adapt and Reflect Privacy-Policy Changes (No. 2022-0-00688).Artificial intelligence (AI) is currently being utilized in a wide range of sophisticated applications, but the outcomes of many AI models are challenging to comprehend and trust due to their black-box nature. Usually, it is essential to understand the reasoning behind an AI mode ľs decision-making. Thus, the need for eXplainable AI (XAI) methods for improving trust in AI models has arisen. XAI has become a popular research subject within the AI field in recent years. Existing survey papers have tackled the concepts of XAI, its general terms, and post-hoc explainability methods but there have not been any reviews that have looked at the assessment methods, available tools, XAI datasets, and other related aspects. Therefore, in this comprehensive study, we provide readers with an overview of the current research and trends in this rapidly emerging area with a case study example. The study starts by explaining the background of XAI, common definitions, and summarizing recently proposed techniques in XAI for supervised machine learning. The review divides XAI techniques into four axes using a hierarchical categorization system: (i) data explainability, (ii) model explainability, (iii) post-hoc explainability, and (iv) assessment of explanations. We also introduce available evaluation metrics as well as open-source packages and datasets with future research directions. Then, the significance of explainability in terms of legal demands, user viewpoints, and application orientation is outlined, termed as XAI concerns. This paper advocates for tailoring explanation content to specific user types. An examination of XAI techniques and evaluation was conducted by looking at 410 critical articles, published between January 2016 and October 2022, in reputed journals and using a wide range of research databases as a source of information. The article is aimed at XAI researchers who are interested in making their AI models more trustworthy, as well as towards researchers from other disciplines who are looking for effective XAI methods to complete tasks with confidence while communicating meaning from data.National Research Foundation of Korea
Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning, Republic of Korea
Ministry of Science & ICT (MSIT), Republic of Korea
2021R1A2C1011198Institute for Information amp; communications Technology Planning amp; Evaluation) (IITP) - Korea government (MSIT) under the ICT Creative Consilience Program
IITP-2021-2020-0-01821AI Platform to Fully Adapt and Reflect Privacy-Policy Changes2022-0-0068
- …