564 research outputs found

    Live Graph Lab: Towards Open, Dynamic and Real Transaction Graphs with NFT

    Full text link
    Numerous studies have been conducted to investigate the properties of large-scale temporal graphs. Despite the ubiquity of these graphs in real-world scenarios, it's usually impractical for us to obtain the whole real-time graphs due to privacy concerns and technical limitations. In this paper, we introduce the concept of {\it Live Graph Lab} for temporal graphs, which enables open, dynamic and real transaction graphs from blockchains. Among them, Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) have become one of the most prominent parts of blockchain over the past several years. With more than \$40 billion market capitalization, this decentralized ecosystem produces massive, anonymous and real transaction activities, which naturally forms a complicated transaction network. However, there is limited understanding about the characteristics of this emerging NFT ecosystem from a temporal graph analysis perspective. To mitigate this gap, we instantiate a live graph with NFT transaction network and investigate its dynamics to provide new observations and insights. Specifically, through downloading and parsing the NFT transaction activities, we obtain a temporal graph with more than 4.5 million nodes and 124 million edges. Then, a series of measurements are presented to understand the properties of the NFT ecosystem. Through comparisons with social, citation, and web networks, our analyses give intriguing findings and point out potential directions for future exploration. Finally, we also study machine learning models in this live graph to enrich the current datasets and provide new opportunities for the graph community. The source codes and dataset are available at https://livegraphlab.github.io.Comment: Accepted by NeurIPS 2023, Datasets and Benchmarks Trac

    A Social Network Approach to Analyzing Token Properties and Abnormal Events in Decentralized Exchanges

    Full text link
    The properties of tokens within the Ethereum blockchain, such as their current prices, trade volumes, and potential future values, have been subjects of numerous studies. The complex interaction of the variables related to tokens makes analyzing them challenging. Employing social networks, a powerful tool for modeling connections within groups or communities, can provide valuable guidance. This study mainly focuses on creating and examining networks related to two major decentralized exchanges: Uniswap Version 2 and SushiSwap. We discovered that the distribution of links to nodes follow a power law making them scale-free networks. Additionally, during our analysis, we made an intresting discovery: the centrality of tokens in exchange graphs provide valuable insights into their value and significance in the world of cryptocurrencies. By observing changes in centrality over time, we uncovered noteworthy events in the cryptocurrency domain, that shows the potential of this networks for extracting information about the exchanges

    Smart Contracts Software Metrics: a First Study

    Get PDF
    ยฉ 2018 The Author(s).Smart contracts (SC) are software codes which reside and run over a blockchain. The code can be written in different languages with the common purpose of implementing various kinds of transactions onto the hosting blockchain, They are ruled by the blockchain infrastructure and work in order to satisfy conditions typical of traditional contracts. The software code must satisfy constrains strongly context dependent which are quite different from traditional software code. In particular, since the bytecode is uploaded in the hosting blockchain, size, computational resources, interaction between different parts of software are all limited and even if the specific software languages implement more or less the same constructs of traditional languages there is not the same freedom as in normal software development. SC software is expected to reflect these constrains on SC software metrics which should display metric values characteristic of the domain and different from more traditional software metrics. We tested this hypothesis on the code of more than twelve thousands SC written in Solidity and uploaded on the Ethereum blockchain. We downloaded the SC from a public repository and computed the statistics of a set of software metrics related to SC and compared them to the metrics extracted from more traditional software projects. Our results show that generally Smart Contracts metrics have ranges more restricted than the corresponding metrics in traditional software systems. Some of the stylized facts, like power law in the tail of the distribution of some metrics, are only approximate but the lines of code follow a log normal distribution which reminds of the same behavior already found in traditional software systems.Submitted Versio

    Impact of Network Connectedness

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์‚ฐ์—…๊ณตํ•™๊ณผ, 2022. 8. ์ด์žฌ์šฑ.๊ธˆ์œต ์ž์‚ฐ์€ ์–ธ์ œ๋‚˜ ๋ฆฌ์Šคํฌ์— ๋…ธ์ถœ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ฆฌ์Šคํฌ์˜ ํฌ๊ธฐ์™€, ๊ฐ ์ž์‚ฐ์ด ๋ฆฌ์Šคํฌ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์–ผ๋งˆ๋‚˜ ๋ณด์ƒ๋ฐ›๋Š” ์ง€๋ฅผ ์ •ํ™•ํžˆ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ์ž์‚ฐ์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๋ฌธ์ œ์ด๋‹ค. ์ž์‚ฐ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ชจํ˜• (asset pricing model)์€ ์ž์‚ฐ์˜ ๋ฆฌ์Šคํฌ์™€ ๊ทธ ๋ณด์ƒ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด์„œ ๊ธˆ์œต ์ž์‚ฐ์˜ ์ˆ˜์ต๋ฅ ์„ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜๋ ค ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ชจํ˜•์ด๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์ž์‚ฐ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ชจํ˜•์˜ ํ˜•ํƒœ ์ค‘ ํŒฉํ„ฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ์— ์ง‘์ค‘ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํŒฉํ„ฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ์ดˆ๊ณผ ์ˆ˜์ต๋ฅ ์„ ํŒฉํ„ฐ์™€ ๋ฒ ํƒ€๋กœ ๋ถ„๋ฆฌํ•ด์„œ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด๋‹ค. ์ „ํ†ต์ ์ธ ํŒฉํ„ฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋“ค์€ ๊ฑฐ์‹œ ๊ธˆ์œต ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋‚˜ ๊ธฐ์—… ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ๋“ฑ์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ํŒฉํ„ฐ์™€ ๋ฒ ํƒ€๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ, ์ด ๋•Œ ์ž์‚ฐ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋งŽ์ด ์ง„ํ–‰๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๋‹ค. ๊ธˆ์œต ์ž์‚ฐ๋“ค์€ ์„œ๋กœ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ฃผ๋Š” ๊ด€๊ณ„์— ์žˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๊ฐ๊ฐ์˜ ์ˆ˜์ต๋ฅ  ๋˜ํ•œ ๊ฐœ๋ณ„์ ์ด ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ์ž์‚ฐ ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜๋ฉฐ ๋™์‹œ์— ํ‰๊ฐ€๋˜์–ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ํŒฉํ„ฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ์— ์ž์‚ฐ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์‹ค์ฆ์  ์ž์‚ฐ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ชจํ˜•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋จผ์ € ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„ ์ธ๊ณต์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง (GNN)์„ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ ํŒฉํ„ฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด ๋•Œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ ๋งŒํผ์ด๋‚˜ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์€ ์ž์‚ฐ ๊ฐ„ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ์ •์˜ํ•  ๊ฒƒ์ธ๊ฐ€๋ผ๋Š” ๋ฌธ์ œ์ด๋‹ค. GNN์€ ๊ทธ ์ž…๋ ฅ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋กœ์„œ ์ž˜ ์ •์˜๋œ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ์š”๊ตฌํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์ž์‚ฐ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋Š” ๋ช…ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ •์˜๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์—, ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ž์‚ฐ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ์„ ํ”ผ์–ด์Šจ ์ƒ๊ด€๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ด๋ฅผ ํŠน์ • ์ž„๊ณ„๊ฐ’์„ ํ†ตํ•ด 0๊ณผ 1๋กœ ์ด์ง„ํ™” ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋Š” ๋ฒ ํƒ€๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ถ€๋ถ„๊ณผ ํŒฉํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ถ€๋ถ„์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜๋‰˜์–ด์ง€๋Š”๋ฐ, ๊ฐ๊ฐ ๊ธฐ์—… ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์™€, ์ˆ˜์ต๋ฅ ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•ด์„œ ์ถ”์ •ํ•œ๋‹ค. 1957๋…„๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋ฏธ๊ตญ์— ์ƒ์žฅ๋œ ์ฃผ์‹๋“ค์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ ์‹ค์ฆ ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ์„ค๋ช…๋ ฅ๊ณผ ์˜ˆ์ธก ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋“ค๋ณด๋‹ค ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ํ†ต๊ณ„์  ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ด์™ธ์—๋„ ํŒฉํ„ฐ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์ œ์  ์˜๋ฏธ๋ฅผ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฉด์—์„œ, ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ถ”์ •ํ•œ ํŒฉํ„ฐ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํšจ์œจ์ ์ธ ํ™•๋ฅ ์  ํ• ์ธ์š”์†Œ (stochastic discount factor)๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ •ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ์  ์—ญ์‹œ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ž์‚ฐ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ชจํ˜•์˜ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๋ชฉ์ ์€ ์ˆ˜์ต๋ฅ ์ด์ง€๋งŒ, ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ ๋˜ํ•œ ๊ธˆ์œต ์ž์‚ฐ์˜ ์›€์ง์ž„์„ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์„ฑ์งˆ์ด๋‹ค. ๋งŽ์€ ์‚ฌ์ „ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๋ฐํ˜€์กŒ๋“ฏ ์ˆ˜์ต๋ฅ ๊ณผ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ ์‚ฌ์ด์—๋Š” ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์กด์žฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์€ ์ˆ˜์ต๋ฅ ์„ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜๋Š” ์š”์ธ์ด ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ž์‚ฐ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ชจํ˜•์—์„œ์™€ ๋งˆ์ฐฌ๊ฐ€์ง€๋กœ ์ž์‚ฐ๋“ค ๊ฐ„์˜ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ ์˜ˆ์ธก์—์„œ๋„ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์— ํฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ ๋ถ„์„์—์„œ๋Š” ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์ž์‚ฐ์˜ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์ด ์„œ๋กœ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์Šคํ•„์˜ค๋ฒ„ (spillover)๋ผ ๋ถ€๋ฅธ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์Šคํ•„์˜ค๋ฒ„ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ง์ ‘์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์˜ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ์ž์‚ฐ ๊ฐ„ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ ์Šคํ•„์˜ค๋ฒ„ ์ง€์ˆ˜๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•œ ์ธ์ ‘ํ–‰๋ ฌ๋กœ ์ •์˜ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋กœ๋Š” ์‹œ๊ณต๊ฐ„์  ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„ ์ธ๊ณต์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง (spatial-temporal GNN)๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ธ€๋กœ๋ฒŒ ์‹œ์žฅ ์ง€์ˆ˜๋“ค์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹ค์ฆ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด์„œ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๋‹จ๊ธฐ์™€ ์ค‘๊ธฐ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ ์˜ˆ์ธก์—์„œ ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ ๋ชจ๋ธ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ข‹์€ ์˜ˆ์ธก ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์ด๊ณ , ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์‹œ์žฅ์— ํฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ฃผ๋Š” ์‹œ์žฅ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์‹œ์žฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์˜ˆ์ธก ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๋†’์ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ์ž์‚ฐ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ชจํ˜•์— ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์„ ์ง์ ‘์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ๋ชจํ˜• ๋‚ด์—์„œ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์ด ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ์ •์˜๋˜๋Š”๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ๋จผ์ € ์‚ดํŽด๋ณด์•„์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์€ ์ž์‚ฐ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ชจํ˜• ๋‚ด์—์„œ ์ž”์ฐจ์˜ ํ‘œ์ค€ํŽธ์ฐจ๋กœ ํ•ด์„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์‹œ๊ณ„์—ด ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ์ž์‚ฐ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ชจํ˜•์€ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋ถˆ๋ณ€ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์‹œ๊ฐ„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋ณ€ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์„ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๊ณ , ์ด๋ฅผ ํŒฉํ„ฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์†์‹คํ•จ์ˆ˜์— ์ •๊ทœํ™”๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋ณ€ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•˜๋Š” ํŒฉํ„ฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ฏธ๊ตญ ์ƒ์žฅ ์ฃผ์‹์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹ค์ฆ ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋ถˆ๋ณ€ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ์™„ํ™”ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ๋ชจ๋ธ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ๋ณ€๋™์„œ์ด ๋‚ฎ์€ ์‹œ๊ธฐ์—์„œ ํ†ต๊ณ„์  ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด ํฐ ํญ์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ์Šนํ•จ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ˜„์žฌ ๋ฌด์‹œํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†๋Š” ๊ทœ๋ชจ๋กœ ์„ฑ์žฅํ•œ ๊ฐ€์ƒํ™”ํ ์‹œ์žฅ์—๋Š” ๊ตฌ์กฐ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ™•์‹คํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ๋œ ์ž์‚ฐ์ด ์กด์žฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ™์€ ๋ธ”๋ก์ฒด์ธ ์ƒ์— ์กด์žฌํ•˜๋Š” ํ† ํฐ๋“ค์€ ํ•ด๋‹น ๋ธ”๋ก์ฒด์ธ ์œ„์—์„œ ๋ฐœํ–‰๋˜๊ณ  ๊ฑฐ๋ž˜๋˜๋ฏ€๋กœ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ๊ตฌ์กฐ ์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ์„ ์ง€๋‹Œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์•ž์„œ ์ง„ํ–‰๋œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‘์šฉ์œผ๋กœ, ๋ช…ํ™•ํžˆ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ๋œ ์ž์‚ฐ๋“ค์ด ์ดˆ๊ณผ ์ˆ˜์ต๋ฅ ์„ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ธก์ • ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๊ณตํ†ต๋œ ํŒฉํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง์„ ๋ณด์ด๊ณ ์ž ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋Œ€์ƒ์„ ์ด๋”๋ฆฌ์›€ ๋ธ”๋ก์ฒด์ธ ์ƒ์˜ ํ† ํฐ๋“ค๋กœ ์ œํ•œํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹ค์ฆ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, EIP-1559 ์ ์šฉ ์ดํ›„์— ์ด๋”๋ฆฌ์›€ ๊ฐ€์Šค ์ˆ˜์ต๋ฅ ์ด ์‹œ์žฅ ์ˆ˜์ต๋ฅ ๊ณผ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ํ† ํฐ์˜ ์ˆ˜์ต๋ฅ ์„ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํŒฉํ„ฐ๋กœ์„œ ์ž‘์šฉํ•จ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ์ด๋”๋ฆฌ์›€ ๊ฐ€์Šค ์ˆ˜์ต๋ฅ ์€ ํ† ํฐ์˜ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ฃผ๋Š” ์š”์†Œ๋กœ, ํ† ํฐ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ ์˜ˆ์ธก์—๋„ ๋„์›€์„ ์ค„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์š”์†Œ์ž„์„ ์Šคํ•„์˜ค๋ฒ„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ์ž์‚ฐ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ์ž์‚ฐ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ชจํ˜•์„ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด์„œ ๊ธˆ์œต ์ž์‚ฐ๋“ค์ด ๊ฐ–๋Š” ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๊ฐ€ ์‹ค์งˆ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ˆ˜์ต๋ฅ ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์นจ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ํ–ฅํ›„ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ธˆ์œต ์‹œ์žฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ๋„ ์ ์šฉ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ํ™•์žฅ์„ฑ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด๋ฉฐ, ๊ธˆ์œต ์ž์‚ฐ์˜ ํ‰๊ฐ€์— ์žˆ์–ด ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์ž์‚ฐ์„ ๋™์‹œ์— ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜๋ฉฐ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ํ•จ์˜์ ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค.Financial assets are always exposed to risks. It is important to evaluate the risk properly and figure out how much each asset is compensated for its risk. Asset pricing model explains the behavior of financial asset return by evaluating the risk and risk exposure of asset return. We focused on factor model structure among asset pricing models, which explains excess return through factor and beta coefficients. While conventional factor models estimate factor or beta through various macroeconomic variables or firm-specific variables, there exist fewer studies considering the connectedness between assets. Since financial assets have connected dynamics, asset returns should be priced simultaneously considering the graph structure of assets. In this dissertation, we proposed the AI-based empirical asset pricing model to reflect the connected structure between assets in the factor model. We first proposed the graph neural network-based multi-factor asset pricing model. As important as the structure of the model in constructing an asset pricing model that reflects the structure of the connection between assets is, how to define the connectivity. Graph neural network requires a well-defined graph structure. We defined the connectedness between assets as the binary converted Pearson correlation coefficients of asset returns by the cutoff value. The proposed model consists of a beta estimation part and a factor estimation part, where each part is estimated with firm characteristics and excess returns, respectively. The empirical analysis of U.S equities reveals that the proposed model has more explanatory power and prediction ability than benchmark models. In addition, the most efficient stochastic discount factor can be estimated from the estimated factors. While return is the main object of asset pricing, volatility is also important property for explaining the behavior of financial assets. Volatility can be the factor in explaining return since many studies point out that return and volatility are correlated. As with the asset pricing model, considering the connected structure between assets in volatility prediction can be of great help in explaining the dynamics of assets. In the volatility analysis, what affects between volatility is called spillover. In this aspect, we proposed the volatility prediction model that can directly reflect this spillover effect. We estimated the graph structure between asset volatility using the volatility spillover index and utilized the spatial-temporal graph neural network structure for model construction. From the empirical analysis of global market indices, we confirm that the proposed model shows the best performance in short- and mid-term volatility forecasting. To include volatility in the asset pricing discussion, it is necessary to focus on how volatility is defined in the asset pricing model. In the asset pricing model, volatility can be interpreted as the variance of the residual of the model. However, asset pricing models with time-series estimation mostly have time-unvarying volatility constraints. We constructed an asset pricing model with time-varying volatility by estimating variability using the prediction model and reflecting it in the training loss of the asset pricing model. We identify that the proposed model can improve the statistical performance during the low volatility period through an empirical study of U.S equities. Currently, there are clearly structurally connected assets in the cryptocurrency market, which has grown to a scale that cannot be ignored. All of the same blockchain-based tokens are issued and traded on that blockchain, so they have strong structural connectivity. We tried to identify that an observable factor for explaining excess return exists in such connected tokens as an application of previous studies. We limited the analysis target to Ethereum-based tokens and showed that the Ethereum gas price became a factor for the macroeconomic factor model after the application of EIP-1559. Furthermore, we applied the volatility spillover index-based volatility prediction model using gas return and showed that gas return can increase the prediction performance of certain tokens' volatility.Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Motivation of the Dissertation 1 1.2 Aims of the Dissertation 10 1.3 Organization of the Dissertation 13 Chapter 2 Graph-based multi-factor asset pricing model 14 2.1 Chapter Overview 14 2.2 Preliminaries 17 2.2.1 Graph Neural Network 17 2.2.2 Graph Convolutional Network 18 2.3 Methodology 19 2.3.1 Multi-factor asset pricing model 19 2.3.2 Proposed method 21 2.3.3 Forward stagewise additive factor modeling 23 2.4 Empirical Studies 24 2.4.1 Data 24 2.4.2 Benchmark models 24 2.4.3 Empirical results 28 2.5 Chapter Summary 33 Chapter 3 Volatility prediction with volatility spillover index 37 3.1 Chapter Overview 37 3.2 Preliminaries 41 3.2.1 Realized Volatility 41 3.2.2 Volatility Spillover Measurements 42 3.2.3 Benchmark Models 45 3.3 Empirical Studies 50 3.3.1 Data 50 3.3.2 Descriptive Statistics 51 3.3.3 Proposed Method 52 3.3.4 Empirical Results 54 3.4 Chapter Summary 61 Chapter 4 Graph-based multi-factor model with time-varying volatility 64 4.1 Chapter overview 64 4.2 Preliminaries 67 4.2.1 Local-linear regression for time-varying parameter estimation 67 4.3 Methodology 68 4.3.1 Time-varying volatility implied loss function 68 4.3.2 Proposed model architecture 70 4.4 Empirical Studies 72 4.4.1 Data 72 4.4.2 Benchmark Models 72 4.4.3 Empirical Results 73 4.5 Chapter Summary 79 Chapter 5 Macroeconomic factor model and spillover-based volatility prediction for ERC-20 tokens 82 5.1 Chapter Overview 82 5.2 Preliminaries 85 5.3 Methodology 86 5.3.1 Relation analysis 86 5.3.2 Factor model analysis 89 5.3.3 Volatility prediction with volatility spillover index 90 5.4 Empirical Studies 90 5.4.1 Data 90 5.4.2 Empirical Results 98 5.5 Chapter Summary 102 Chapter 6 Conclusion 105 6.1 Contributions 105 6.2 Future Work 108 Bibliography 109 ๊ตญ๋ฌธ์ดˆ๋ก 130๋ฐ•

    AI-powered Fraud Detection in Decentralized Finance: A Project Life Cycle Perspective

    Full text link
    In recent years, blockchain technology has introduced decentralized finance (DeFi) as an alternative to traditional financial systems. DeFi aims to create a transparent and efficient financial ecosystem using smart contracts and emerging decentralized applications. However, the growing popularity of DeFi has made it a target for fraudulent activities, resulting in losses of billions of dollars due to various types of frauds. To address these issues, researchers have explored the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) approaches to detect such fraudulent activities. Yet, there is a lack of a systematic survey to organize and summarize those existing works and to identify the future research opportunities. In this survey, we provide a systematic taxonomy of various frauds in the DeFi ecosystem, categorized by the different stages of a DeFi project's life cycle: project development, introduction, growth, maturity, and decline. This taxonomy is based on our finding: many frauds have strong correlations in the stage of the DeFi project. According to the taxonomy, we review existing AI-powered detection methods, including statistical modeling, natural language processing and other machine learning techniques, etc. We find that fraud detection in different stages employs distinct types of methods and observe the commendable performance of tree-based and graph-related models in tackling fraud detection tasks. By analyzing the challenges and trends, we present the findings to provide proactive suggestion and guide future research in DeFi fraud detection. We believe that this survey is able to support researchers, practitioners, and regulators in establishing a secure and trustworthy DeFi ecosystem.Comment: 38 pages, update reference
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore