18,759 research outputs found
Community Detection via Maximization of Modularity and Its Variants
In this paper, we first discuss the definition of modularity (Q) used as a
metric for community quality and then we review the modularity maximization
approaches which were used for community detection in the last decade. Then, we
discuss two opposite yet coexisting problems of modularity optimization: in
some cases, it tends to favor small communities over large ones while in
others, large communities over small ones (so called the resolution limit
problem). Next, we overview several community quality metrics proposed to solve
the resolution limit problem and discuss Modularity Density (Qds) which
simultaneously avoids the two problems of modularity. Finally, we introduce two
novel fine-tuned community detection algorithms that iteratively attempt to
improve the community quality measurements by splitting and merging the given
network community structure. The first of them, referred to as Fine-tuned Q, is
based on modularity (Q) while the second one is based on Modularity Density
(Qds) and denoted as Fine-tuned Qds. Then, we compare the greedy algorithm of
modularity maximization (denoted as Greedy Q), Fine-tuned Q, and Fine-tuned Qds
on four real networks, and also on the classical clique network and the LFR
benchmark networks, each of which is instantiated by a wide range of
parameters. The results indicate that Fine-tuned Qds is the most effective
among the three algorithms discussed. Moreover, we show that Fine-tuned Qds can
be applied to the communities detected by other algorithms to significantly
improve their results
Multi-level algorithms for modularity clustering
Modularity is one of the most widely used quality measures for graph
clusterings. Maximizing modularity is NP-hard, and the runtime of exact
algorithms is prohibitive for large graphs. A simple and effective class of
heuristics coarsens the graph by iteratively merging clusters (starting from
singletons), and optionally refines the resulting clustering by iteratively
moving individual vertices between clusters. Several heuristics of this type
have been proposed in the literature, but little is known about their relative
performance.
This paper experimentally compares existing and new coarsening- and
refinement-based heuristics with respect to their effectiveness (achieved
modularity) and efficiency (runtime). Concerning coarsening, it turns out that
the most widely used criterion for merging clusters (modularity increase) is
outperformed by other simple criteria, and that a recent algorithm by Schuetz
and Caflisch is no improvement over simple greedy coarsening for these
criteria. Concerning refinement, a new multi-level algorithm is shown to
produce significantly better clusterings than conventional single-level
algorithms. A comparison with published benchmark results and algorithm
implementations shows that combinations of coarsening and multi-level
refinement are competitive with the best algorithms in the literature.Comment: 12 pages, 10 figures, see
http://www.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/~rrotta/ for downloading the graph
clustering softwar
- …