13,892 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Skills in Ethics for Engineers
A script of a lecture giving examples of everyday ethical statements made in an engineering context, making a link with the views of the ethicist G.E. Moore and a conclusion about the skills that engineers might acquire to partcipate in ethical debate
Recommended from our members
Smart Cities and M<sup>3</sup>: Rapid Research, Meaningful Metrics and Co-Design
The research described in this paper is undertaken under the banner of the smart city, a concept that captures the way urban spaces are re-made by the incursion of new technology. Much of smart is centred on converting everyday activities into data, and using this data to generate knowledge mediated by technology. Ordinary citizens, those that may have their lives impacted by the technology, usually are not properly involved in the ‘smartification’ process. Their perceptions, concerns and expectations should inform the conception and development of smart technologies at the same extent. How to engage general public with smart cities research is the central challenge for the Making Metrics Meaningful (MMM) project. Applying a rapid participatory method, ‘Imagine’ over a five-month period (March – July) the research sought to gain insights from the general public into novel forms of information system innovation. This brief paper describes the nature of the accelerated research undertaken and explores some of the themes which emerged in the analysis. Generic themes, beyond the remit of an explicit transport focus, are developed and pointers towards further research directions are discussed. Participatory methods, including engaging with self- selected transport users actively through both picture creation and programmatically specific musical ‘signatures’ as well as group discussion, were found to be effective in eliciting users’ own concerns, needs and ideas for novel information systems
How Much of the Web Is Archived?
Although the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine is the largest and most
well-known web archive, there have been a number of public web archives that
have emerged in the last several years. With varying resources, audiences and
collection development policies, these archives have varying levels of overlap
with each other. While individual archives can be measured in terms of number
of URIs, number of copies per URI, and intersection with other archives, to
date there has been no answer to the question "How much of the Web is
archived?" We study the question by approximating the Web using sample URIs
from DMOZ, Delicious, Bitly, and search engine indexes; and, counting the
number of copies of the sample URIs exist in various public web archives. Each
sample set provides its own bias. The results from our sample sets indicate
that range from 35%-90% of the Web has at least one archived copy, 17%-49% has
between 2-5 copies, 1%-8% has 6-10 copies, and 8%-63% has more than 10 copies
in public web archives. The number of URI copies varies as a function of time,
but no more than 31.3% of URIs are archived more than once per month.Comment: This is the long version of the short paper by the same title
published at JCDL'11. 10 pages, 5 figures, 7 tables. Version 2 includes minor
typographical correction
Vision of a Visipedia
The web is not perfect: while text is easily
searched and organized, pictures (the vast majority of the bits
that one can find online) are not. In order to see how one could
improve the web and make pictures first-class citizens of the
web, I explore the idea of Visipedia, a visual interface for
Wikipedia that is able to answer visual queries and enables
experts to contribute and organize visual knowledge. Five
distinct groups of humans would interact through Visipedia:
users, experts, editors, visual workers, and machine vision
scientists. The latter would gradually build automata able to
interpret images. I explore some of the technical challenges
involved in making Visipedia happen. I argue that Visipedia will
likely grow organically, combining state-of-the-art machine
vision with human labor
A Comparison between Deep Neural Nets and Kernel Acoustic Models for Speech Recognition
We study large-scale kernel methods for acoustic modeling and compare to DNNs
on performance metrics related to both acoustic modeling and recognition.
Measuring perplexity and frame-level classification accuracy, kernel-based
acoustic models are as effective as their DNN counterparts. However, on
token-error-rates DNN models can be significantly better. We have discovered
that this might be attributed to DNN's unique strength in reducing both the
perplexity and the entropy of the predicted posterior probabilities. Motivated
by our findings, we propose a new technique, entropy regularized perplexity,
for model selection. This technique can noticeably improve the recognition
performance of both types of models, and reduces the gap between them. While
effective on Broadcast News, this technique could be also applicable to other
tasks.Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1411.400
TLAD 2011 Proceedings:9th international workshop on teaching, learning and assesment of databases (TLAD)
This is the ninth in the series of highly successful international workshops on the Teaching, Learning and Assessment of Databases (TLAD 2011), which once again is held as a workshop of BNCOD 2011 - the 28th British National Conference on Databases. TLAD 2011 is held on the 11th July at Manchester University, just before BNCOD, and hopes to be just as successful as its predecessors.The teaching of databases is central to all Computing Science, Software Engineering, Information Systems and Information Technology courses, and this year, the workshop aims to continue the tradition of bringing together both database teachers and researchers, in order to share good learning, teaching and assessment practice and experience, and further the growing community amongst database academics. As well as attracting academics from the UK community, the workshop has also been successful in attracting academics from the wider international community, through serving on the programme committee, and attending and presenting papers.Due to the healthy number of high quality submissions this year, the workshop will present eight peer reviewed papers. Of these, six will be presented as full papers and two as short papers. These papers cover a number of themes, including: the teaching of data mining and data warehousing, databases and the cloud, and novel uses of technology in teaching and assessment. It is expected that these papers will stimulate discussion at the workshop itself and beyond. This year, the focus on providing a forum for discussion is enhanced through a panel discussion on assessment in database modules, with David Nelson (of the University of Sunderland), Al Monger (of Southampton Solent University) and Charles Boisvert (of Sheffield Hallam University) as the expert panel
- …