Méthodologie de génération de plateforme de prototypage à base de multi-fpga

Multi-FPGA based prototyping is no longer optional for hardware/software integration. We can classify multi-FPGA prototyping platforms in three categories: off-the-shelf, custom and cabling. The cabling platform is semi off-the-shelf and semi custom. Nevertheless, crafting a custom and a cabling platform is today a manual process, which is time-consuming. The performance and the cost of the platform lie on the FPGA expertise and SoC DUT knowledge of the engineers. Compared to OTS platforms, the added value, in terms of performance, of cabling or custom platforms can be heavily impaired by an inefficient board design. Moreover, FPGA I/Os are becoming a scarce resource, worsening the inter-FPGA bandwidth generation after generation. Therefore, it becomes more and more difficult to prototype an SoC/ASIC design at proper performance. The contributions of the manuscript are: (1). An automatic implementation flow for an OTS platform is proposed. (2). An automatic design flow for creating a custom platform is proposed, thus increasing the productivity, enabling the board exploration, and optimizing cost and performance. (3). The cabling platform is proposed where one board is composed of one FPGA and several connectors, with an algorithm to automatically find a solution for the cable distribution. (4). Thanks to the developed automatic tools, the three different multi-FPGA platforms are compared. The custom platform always achieves better performance and lower deployment cost, but still with 3-5 months in time of availability. If the performance or the deployment cost are not rigorous constraints, the cabling platform offers an attractive alternative compared to others.Face à la difficulté de l’intégration matériel/logiciel, le prototypage à base de multi-FPGA devient obligatoire dans la vérification pré-silicium. Les plateformes de prototypage peuvent être classées en trois catégories: OTS, sur mesure et câblées. La plateforme câblée est semi OTS et semi sur mesure. Néanmoins, la création d’une plateforme sur mesure et câblée est un processus manuel et chronophage. La performance et le coût de la plateforme dépend de l'expérience de concepteurs en expertise de FPGA et connaissance du système sur puce. Par rapport à des plateformes OTS, la valeur ajoutée, en terme de performance, des plateformes câblées ou sur mesure peuvent être fortement dégradée par une carte inefficace. En plus, FPGA E/S devient une ressource rare, aggravant la bande passante inter-FPGA. Par conséquent, il devient de plus en plus difficile de prototyper un design à une performance satisfaisante. Les contributions sont: (1). Un flot de implémentation automatique pour une plateforme OTS. (2). Un flot de conception automatique pour créer une plateforme sur mesure, ainsi augmentant la productivité, permettant l’exploration de carte et optimisant le coût et la performance. (3). La plateforme câblée avec un algorithme permettant automatiquement de trouver une solution pour la distribution des câbles. (4). Grâce aux flots automatique, les trois plateformes sont comparées. La plateforme sur mesure toujours réalise plus de performance et moins de coût de déploiement, mais encore avec 3-5 mois en temps de disponibilité. Si la performance ou le coût de déploiement ne sont pas les contraintes strictes, la plateforme câblée est une alternative intéressante par rapport aux autres

Cycle-accurate multicore performance models on FPGAs

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2011.Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.Includes bibliographical references (p. 159-165).The goal of this project is to improve computer architecture by accelerating cycle-accurate performance modeling of multicore processors using FPGAs. Contributions include a distributed technique controlling simulation on a highly-parallel substrate, hardware design techniques to reduce development effort, and a specific framework for modeling shared-memory multicore processors paired with realistic On-Chip Networks.by Michael Pellauer.Ph.D

Towards hardware as a reconfigurable, elastic, and specialized service

As modern Data Center workloads become increasingly complex, constrained, and critical, mainstream CPU-centric computing has had ever more difficulty in keeping pace. Future data centers are moving towards a more fluid and heterogeneous model, with computation and communication no longer localized to commodity CPUs and routers. Next generation data-centric Data Centers will compute everywhere, whether data is stationary (e.g. in memory) or on the move (e.g. in network). While deploying FPGAs in NICS, as co-processors, in the router, and in Bump-in-the-Wire configurations is a step towards implementing the data-centric model, it is only part of the overall solution. The other part is actually leveraging this reconfigurable hardware. For this to happen, two problems must be addressed: code generation and deployment generation. By code generation we mean transforming abstract representations of an algorithm into equivalent hardware. Deployment generation refers to the runtime support needed to facilitate the execution of this hardware on an FPGA. Efforts at creating supporting tools in these two areas have thus far provided limited benefits. This is because the efforts are limited in one or more of the following ways: They i) do not provide fundamental solutions to a number of challenges, which makes them useful only to a limited group of (mostly) hardware developers, ii) are constrained in their scope, or iii) are ad hoc, i.e., specific to a single usage context, FPGA vendor, or Data Center configuration. Moreover, efforts in these areas have largely been mutually exclusive, which results in incompatibility across development layers; this requires wrappers to be designed to make interfaces compatible. As a result there is significant complexity and effort required to code and deploy efficient custom hardware for FPGAs; effort that may be orders-of-magnitude greater than for analogous software environments. The goal of this dissertation is to create a framework that enables reconfigurable logic in Data Centers to be targeted with the same level of effort as for a single CPU core. The underlying mechanism to this is a framework, which we refer to as Hardware as a Reconfigurable, Elastic and Specialized Service, or HaaRNESS. In this dissertation, we address two of the core challenges of HaaRNESS: reducing the complexity of code generation by constraining High Level Synthesis (HLS) toolflows, and replacing ad hoc models of deployment generation by generalizing and formalizing what is needed for a hardware Operating System. These parts are unified by the back-end of HLS toolflows which link generated compute pipelines with the operating system, and provide appropriate APIs, wrappers, and software runtimes. The contributions of this dissertation are the following: i) an empirically guided set of systematic transformations for generating high quality HLS code; ii) a framework for instrumenting HLS compiler to identify and remove optimization blockers; iii) a framework for RTL simulation and IP generation of HLS kernels for rapid turnaround; and iv) a framework for generalization and formalization of hardware operating systems to address the {\it ad hoc}'ness of existing deployment generation and ensure uniform structure and APIs

High performance communication on reconfigurable clusters

High Performance Computing (HPC) has matured to where it is an essential third pillar, along with theory and experiment, in most domains of science and engineering. Communication latency is a key factor that is limiting the performance of HPC, but can be addressed by integrating communication into accelerators. This integration allows accelerators to communicate with each other without CPU interactions, and even bypassing the network stack. Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) are the accelerators that currently best integrate communication with computation. The large number of Multi-gigabit Transceivers (MGTs) on most high-end FPGAs can provide high-bandwidth and low-latency inter-FPGA connections. Additionally, the reconfigurable FPGA fabric enables tight coupling between computation kernel and network interface. Our thesis is that an application-aware communication infrastructure for a multi-FPGA system makes substantial progress in solving the HPC communication bottleneck. This dissertation aims to provide an application-aware solution for communication infrastructure for FPGA-centric clusters. Specifically, our solution demonstrates application-awareness across multiple levels in the network stack, including low-level link protocols, router microarchitectures, routing algorithms, and applications. We start by investigating the low-level link protocol and the impact of its latency variance on performance. Our results demonstrate that, although some link jitter is always present, we can still assume near-synchronous communication on an FPGA-cluster. This provides the necessary condition for statically-scheduled routing. We then propose two novel router microarchitectures for two different kinds of workloads: a wormhole Virtual Channel (VC)-based router for workloads with dynamic communication, and a statically-scheduled Virtual Output Queueing (VOQ)-based router for workloads with static communication. For the first (VC-based) router, we propose a framework that generates application-aware router configurations. Our results show that, by adding application-awareness into router configuration, the network performance of FPGA clusters can be substantially improved. For the second (VOQ-based) router, we propose a novel offline collective routing algorithm. This shows a significant advantage over a state-of-the-art collective routing algorithm. We apply our communication infrastructure to a critical strong-scaling HPC kernel, the 3D FFT. The experimental results demonstrate that the performance of our design is faster than that on CPUs and GPUs by at least one order of magnitude (achieving strong scaling for the target applications). Surprisingly, the FPGA cluster performance is similar to that of an ASIC-cluster. We also implement the 3D FFT on another multi-FPGA platform: the Microsoft Catapult II cloud. Its performance is also comparable or superior to CPU and GPU HPC clusters. The second application we investigate is Molecular Dynamics Simulation (MD). We model MD on both FPGA clouds and clusters. We find that combining processing and general communication in the same device leads to extremely promising performance and the prospect of MD simulations well into the us/day range with a commodity cloud

Scalable reconfigurable computing leveraging latency-insensitive channels

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2013.Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.Includes bibliographical references (p. 190-197).Traditionally, FPGAs have been confined to the limited role of small, low-volume ASIC replacements and as circuit emulators. However, continued Moore's law scaling has given FPGAs new life as accelerators for applications that map well to fine-grained parallel substrates. Examples of such applications include processor modelling, compression, and digital signal processing. Although FPGAs continue to increase in size, some interesting designs still fail to fit in to a single FPGA. Many tools exist that partition RTL descriptions across FPGAs. Unfortunately, existing tools have low performance due to the inefficiency of maintaining the cycle-by-cycle behavior of RTL among discrete FPGAs. These tools are unsuitable for use in FPGA program acceleration, as the purpose of an accelerator is to make applications run faster. This thesis presents latency-insensitive channels, a language-level mechanism by which programmers express points in their their design at which the cycle-by-cycle behavior of the design may be modified by the compiler. By decoupling the timing of portions of the RTL from the high-level function of the program, designs may be mapped to multiple FPGAs without suffering the performance degradation observed in existing tools. This thesis demonstrates, using a diverse set of large designs, that FPGA programs described in terms of latency-insensitive channels obtain significant gains in design feasibility, compilation time, and run-time when mapped to multiple FPGAs.by Kermin Elliott Fleming, Jr.Ph.D

FPGA structures for high speed and low overhead dynamic circuit specialization

A Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) is a programmable digital electronic chip. The FPGA does not come with a predefined function from the manufacturer; instead, the developer has to define its function through implementing a digital circuit on the FPGA resources. The functionality of the FPGA can be reprogrammed as desired and hence the name “field programmable”. FPGAs are useful in small volume digital electronic products as the design of a digital custom chip is expensive. Changing the FPGA (also called configuring it) is done by changing the configuration data (in the form of bitstreams) that defines the FPGA functionality. These bitstreams are stored in a memory of the FPGA called configuration memory. The SRAM cells of LookUp Tables (LUTs), Block Random Access Memories (BRAMs) and DSP blocks together form the configuration memory of an FPGA. The configuration data can be modified according to the user’s needs to implement the user-defined hardware. The simplest way to program the configuration memory is to download the bitstreams using a JTAG interface. However, modern techniques such as Partial Reconfiguration (PR) enable us to configure a part in the configuration memory with partial bitstreams during run-time. The reconfiguration is achieved by swapping in partial bitstreams into the configuration memory via a configuration interface called Internal Configuration Access Port (ICAP). The ICAP is a hardware primitive (macro) present in the FPGA used to access the configuration memory internally by an embedded processor. The reconfiguration technique adds flexibility to use specialized ci rcuits that are more compact and more efficient t han t heir b ulky c ounterparts. An example of such an implementation is the use of specialized multipliers instead of big generic multipliers in an FIR implementation with constant coefficients. To specialize these circuits and reconfigure during the run-time, researchers at the HES group proposed the novel technique called parameterized reconfiguration that can be used to efficiently and automatically implement Dynamic Circuit Specialization (DCS) that is built on top of the Partial Reconfiguration method. It uses the run-time reconfiguration technique that is tailored to implement a parameterized design. An application is said to be parameterized if some of its input values change much less frequently than the rest. These inputs are called parameters. Instead of implementing these parameters as regular inputs, in DCS these inputs are implemented as constants, and the application is optimized for the constants. For every change in parameter values, the design is re-optimized (specialized) during run-time and implemented by reconfiguring the optimized design for a new set of parameters. In DCS, the bitstreams of the parameterized design are expressed as Boolean functions of the parameters. For every infrequent change in parameters, a specialized FPGA configuration is generated by evaluating the corresponding Boolean functions, and the FPGA is reconfigured with the specialized configuration. A detailed study of overheads of DCS and providing suitable solutions with appropriate custom FPGA structures is the primary goal of the dissertation. I also suggest different improvements to the FPGA configuration memory architecture. After offering the custom FPGA structures, I investigated the role of DCS on FPGA overlays and the use of custom FPGA structures that help to reduce the overheads of DCS on FPGA overlays. By doing so, I hope I can convince the developer to use DCS (which now comes with minimal costs) in real-world applications. I start the investigations of overheads of DCS by implementing an adaptive FIR filter (using the DCS technique) on three different Xilinx FPGA platforms: Virtex-II Pro, Virtex-5, and Zynq-SoC. The study of how DCS behaves and what is its overhead in the evolution of the three FPGA platforms is the non-trivial basis to discover the costs of DCS. After that, I propose custom FPGA structures (reconfiguration controllers and reconfiguration drivers) to reduce the main overhead (reconfiguration time) of DCS. These structures not only reduce the reconfiguration time but also help curbing the power hungry part of the DCS system. After these chapters, I study the role of DCS on FPGA overlays. I investigate the effect of the proposed FPGA structures on Virtual-Coarse-Grained Reconfigurable Arrays (VCGRAs). I classify the VCGRA implementations into three types: the conventional VCGRA, partially parameterized VCGRA and fully parameterized VCGRA depending upon the level of parameterization. I have designed two variants of VCGRA grids for HPC image processing applications, namely, the MAC grid and Pixie. Finally, I try to tackle the reconfiguration time overhead at the hardware level of the FPGA by customizing the FPGA configuration memory architecture. In this part of my research, I propose to use a parallel memory structure to improve the reconfiguration time of DCS drastically. However, this improvement comes with a significant overhead of hardware resources which will need to be solved in future research on commercial FPGA configuration memory architectures