3,848 research outputs found
Local majority dynamics on preferential attachment graphs
Suppose in a graph vertices can be either red or blue. Let be odd. At
each time step, each vertex in polls random neighbours and takes
the majority colour. If it doesn't have neighbours, it simply polls all of
them, or all less one if the degree of is even. We study this protocol on
the preferential attachment model of Albert and Barab\'asi, which gives rise to
a degree distribution that has roughly power-law ,
as well as generalisations which give exponents larger than . The setting is
as follows: Initially each vertex of is red independently with probability
, and is otherwise blue. We show that if is
sufficiently biased away from , then with high probability,
consensus is reached on the initial global majority within
steps. Here is the number of vertices and is the minimum of
and (or if is even), being the number of edges each new
vertex adds in the preferential attachment generative process. Additionally,
our analysis reduces the required bias of for graphs of a given degree
sequence studied by the first author (which includes, e.g., random regular
graphs)
The Power of Two Choices in Distributed Voting
Distributed voting is a fundamental topic in distributed computing. In pull
voting, in each step every vertex chooses a neighbour uniformly at random, and
adopts its opinion. The voting is completed when all vertices hold the same
opinion. On many graph classes including regular graphs, pull voting requires
expected steps to complete, even if initially there are only two
distinct opinions.
In this paper we consider a related process which we call two-sample voting:
every vertex chooses two random neighbours in each step. If the opinions of
these neighbours coincide, then the vertex revises its opinion according to the
chosen sample. Otherwise, it keeps its own opinion. We consider the performance
of this process in the case where two different opinions reside on vertices of
some (arbitrary) sets and , respectively. Here, is the
number of vertices of the graph.
We show that there is a constant such that if the initial imbalance
between the two opinions is ?, then with high probability two sample voting completes in a random
regular graph in steps and the initial majority opinion wins. We
also show the same performance for any regular graph, if where is the second largest eigenvalue of the transition
matrix. In the graphs we consider, standard pull voting requires
steps, and the minority can still win with probability .Comment: 22 page
Phase Transitions of Best-of-Two and Best-of-Three on Stochastic Block Models
This paper is concerned with voting processes on graphs where each vertex
holds one of two different opinions. In particular, we study the
\emph{Best-of-two} and the \emph{Best-of-three}. Here at each synchronous and
discrete time step, each vertex updates its opinion to match the majority among
the opinions of two random neighbors and itself (the Best-of-two) or the
opinions of three random neighbors (the Best-of-three). Previous studies have
explored these processes on complete graphs and expander graphs, but we
understand significantly less about their properties on graphs with more
complicated structures.
In this paper, we study the Best-of-two and the Best-of-three on the
stochastic block model , which is a random graph consisting of two
distinct Erd\H{o}s-R\'enyi graphs joined by random edges with density
. We obtain two main results. First, if and
is a constant, we show that there is a phase transition in with
threshold (specifically, for the Best-of-two, and
for the Best-of-three). If , the process reaches consensus
within steps for any initial opinion
configuration with a bias of . By contrast, if , then there
exists an initial opinion configuration with a bias of from which
the process requires at least steps to reach consensus. Second,
if is a constant and , we show that, for any initial opinion
configuration, the process reaches consensus within steps. To the
best of our knowledge, this is the first result concerning multiple-choice
voting for arbitrary initial opinion configurations on non-complete graphs
Bounds on the Voter Model in Dynamic Networks
In the voter model, each node of a graph has an opinion, and in every round
each node chooses independently a random neighbour and adopts its opinion. We
are interested in the consensus time, which is the first point in time where
all nodes have the same opinion. We consider dynamic graphs in which the edges
are rewired in every round (by an adversary) giving rise to the graph sequence
, where we assume that has conductance at least
. We assume that the degrees of nodes don't change over time as one can
show that the consensus time can become super-exponential otherwise. In the
case of a sequence of -regular graphs, we obtain asymptotically tight
results. Even for some static graphs, such as the cycle, our results improve
the state of the art. Here we show that the expected number of rounds until all
nodes have the same opinion is bounded by , for any
graph with edges, conductance , and degrees at least . In
addition, we consider a biased dynamic voter model, where each opinion is
associated with a probability , and when a node chooses a neighbour with
that opinion, it adopts opinion with probability (otherwise the node
keeps its current opinion). We show for any regular dynamic graph, that if
there is an difference between the highest and second highest
opinion probabilities, and at least nodes have initially the
opinion with the highest probability, then all nodes adopt w.h.p. that opinion.
We obtain a bound on the convergences time, which becomes for
static graphs
Simple Dynamics for Plurality Consensus
We study a \emph{Plurality-Consensus} process in which each of anonymous
agents of a communication network initially supports an opinion (a color chosen
from a finite set ). Then, in every (synchronous) round, each agent can
revise his color according to the opinions currently held by a random sample of
his neighbors. It is assumed that the initial color configuration exhibits a
sufficiently large \emph{bias} towards a fixed plurality color, that is,
the number of nodes supporting the plurality color exceeds the number of nodes
supporting any other color by additional nodes. The goal is having the
process to converge to the \emph{stable} configuration in which all nodes
support the initial plurality. We consider a basic model in which the network
is a clique and the update rule (called here the \emph{3-majority dynamics}) of
the process is the following: each agent looks at the colors of three random
neighbors and then applies the majority rule (breaking ties uniformly).
We prove that the process converges in time with high probability, provided that .
We then prove that our upper bound above is tight as long as . This fact implies an exponential time-gap between the
plurality-consensus process and the \emph{median} process studied by Doerr et
al. in [ACM SPAA'11].
A natural question is whether looking at more (than three) random neighbors
can significantly speed up the process. We provide a negative answer to this
question: In particular, we show that samples of polylogarithmic size can speed
up the process by a polylogarithmic factor only.Comment: Preprint of journal versio
Distributed anonymous function computation in information fusion and multiagent systems
We propose a model for deterministic distributed function computation by a
network of identical and anonymous nodes, with bounded computation and storage
capabilities that do not scale with the network size. Our goal is to
characterize the class of functions that can be computed within this model. In
our main result, we exhibit a class of non-computable functions, and prove that
every function outside this class can at least be approximated. The problem of
computing averages in a distributed manner plays a central role in our
development
- âŠ