10,643 research outputs found
Qualitative Effects of Knowledge Rules in Probabilistic Data Integration
One of the problems in data integration is data overlap: the fact that different data sources have data on the same real world entities. Much development time in data integration projects is devoted to entity resolution. Often advanced similarity measurement techniques are used to remove semantic duplicates from the integration result or solve other semantic conflicts, but it proofs impossible to get rid of all semantic problems in data integration. An often-used rule of thumb states that about 90% of the development effort is devoted to solving the remaining 10% hard cases. In an attempt to significantly decrease human effort at data integration time, we have proposed an approach that stores any remaining semantic uncertainty and conflicts in a probabilistic database enabling it to already be meaningfully used. The main development effort in our approach is devoted to defining and tuning knowledge rules and thresholds. Rules and thresholds directly impact the size and quality of the integration result. We measure integration quality indirectly by measuring the quality of answers to queries on the integrated data set in an information retrieval-like way. The main contribution of this report is an experimental investigation of the effects and sensitivity of rule definition and threshold tuning on the integration quality. This proves that our approach indeed reduces development effort — and not merely shifts the effort to rule definition and threshold tuning — by showing that setting rough safe thresholds and defining only a few rules suffices to produce a ‘good enough’ integration that can be meaningfully used
Indeterministic Handling of Uncertain Decisions in Duplicate Detection
In current research, duplicate detection is usually considered as a deterministic approach in which tuples are either declared as duplicates or not. However, most often it is not completely clear whether two tuples represent the same real-world entity or not. In deterministic approaches, however, this uncertainty is ignored, which in turn can lead to false decisions. In this paper, we present an indeterministic approach for handling uncertain decisions in a duplicate detection process by using a probabilistic target schema. Thus, instead of deciding between multiple possible worlds, all these worlds can be modeled in the resulting data. This approach minimizes the negative impacts of false decisions. Furthermore, the duplicate detection process becomes almost fully automatic and human effort can be reduced to a large extent. Unfortunately, a full-indeterministic approach is by definition too expensive (in time as well as in storage) and hence impractical. For that reason, we additionally introduce several semi-indeterministic methods for heuristically reducing the set of indeterministic handled decisions in a meaningful way
Explain3D: Explaining Disagreements in Disjoint Datasets
Data plays an important role in applications, analytic processes, and many
aspects of human activity. As data grows in size and complexity, we are met
with an imperative need for tools that promote understanding and explanations
over data-related operations. Data management research on explanations has
focused on the assumption that data resides in a single dataset, under one
common schema. But the reality of today's data is that it is frequently
un-integrated, coming from different sources with different schemas. When
different datasets provide different answers to semantically similar questions,
understanding the reasons for the discrepancies is challenging and cannot be
handled by the existing single-dataset solutions.
In this paper, we propose Explain3D, a framework for explaining the
disagreements across disjoint datasets (3D). Explain3D focuses on identifying
the reasons for the differences in the results of two semantically similar
queries operating on two datasets with potentially different schemas. Our
framework leverages the queries to perform a semantic mapping across the
relevant parts of their provenance; discrepancies in this mapping point to
causes of the queries' differences. Exploiting the queries gives Explain3D an
edge over traditional schema matching and record linkage techniques, which are
query-agnostic. Our work makes the following contributions: (1) We formalize
the problem of deriving optimal explanations for the differences of the results
of semantically similar queries over disjoint datasets. (2) We design a 3-stage
framework for solving the optimal explanation problem. (3) We develop a
smart-partitioning optimizer that improves the efficiency of the framework by
orders of magnitude. (4)~We experiment with real-world and synthetic data to
demonstrate that Explain3D can derive precise explanations efficiently
Transforming Graph Representations for Statistical Relational Learning
Relational data representations have become an increasingly important topic
due to the recent proliferation of network datasets (e.g., social, biological,
information networks) and a corresponding increase in the application of
statistical relational learning (SRL) algorithms to these domains. In this
article, we examine a range of representation issues for graph-based relational
data. Since the choice of relational data representation for the nodes, links,
and features can dramatically affect the capabilities of SRL algorithms, we
survey approaches and opportunities for relational representation
transformation designed to improve the performance of these algorithms. This
leads us to introduce an intuitive taxonomy for data representation
transformations in relational domains that incorporates link transformation and
node transformation as symmetric representation tasks. In particular, the
transformation tasks for both nodes and links include (i) predicting their
existence, (ii) predicting their label or type, (iii) estimating their weight
or importance, and (iv) systematically constructing their relevant features. We
motivate our taxonomy through detailed examples and use it to survey and
compare competing approaches for each of these tasks. We also discuss general
conditions for transforming links, nodes, and features. Finally, we highlight
challenges that remain to be addressed
- …