8,255 research outputs found
Wronging a Right: Generating Better Errors to Improve Grammatical Error Detection
Grammatical error correction, like other machine learning tasks, greatly
benefits from large quantities of high quality training data, which is
typically expensive to produce. While writing a program to automatically
generate realistic grammatical errors would be difficult, one could learn the
distribution of naturallyoccurring errors and attempt to introduce them into
other datasets. Initial work on inducing errors in this way using statistical
machine translation has shown promise; we investigate cheaply constructing
synthetic samples, given a small corpus of human-annotated data, using an
off-the-rack attentive sequence-to-sequence model and a straight-forward
post-processing procedure. Our approach yields error-filled artificial data
that helps a vanilla bi-directional LSTM to outperform the previous state of
the art at grammatical error detection, and a previously introduced model to
gain further improvements of over 5% score. When attempting to
determine if a given sentence is synthetic, a human annotator at best achieves
39.39 score, indicating that our model generates mostly human-like
instances.Comment: Accepted as a short paper at EMNLP 201
GenERRate: generating errors for use in grammatical error detection
This paper explores the issue of automatically generated ungrammatical data and its use in error detection, with a focus on the task of classifying a sentence as grammatical or ungrammatical. We present an error generation tool called GenERRate and show how GenERRate can be used to improve the performance of a classifier on learner data. We describe
initial attempts to replicate Cambridge Learner Corpus errors using GenERRate
Referenceless Quality Estimation for Natural Language Generation
Traditional automatic evaluation measures for natural language generation
(NLG) use costly human-authored references to estimate the quality of a system
output. In this paper, we propose a referenceless quality estimation (QE)
approach based on recurrent neural networks, which predicts a quality score for
a NLG system output by comparing it to the source meaning representation only.
Our method outperforms traditional metrics and a constant baseline in most
respects; we also show that synthetic data helps to increase correlation
results by 21% compared to the base system. Our results are comparable to
results obtained in similar QE tasks despite the more challenging setting.Comment: Accepted as a regular paper to 1st Workshop on Learning to Generate
Natural Language (LGNL), Sydney, 10 August 201
- …