27,215 research outputs found
A Story of Parametric Trace Slicing, Garbage and Static Analysis
This paper presents a proposal (story) of how statically detecting
unreachable objects (in Java) could be used to improve a particular runtime
verification approach (for Java), namely parametric trace slicing. Monitoring
algorithms for parametric trace slicing depend on garbage collection to (i)
cleanup data-structures storing monitored objects, ensuring they do not become
unmanageably large, and (ii) anticipate the violation of (non-safety)
properties that cannot be satisfied as a monitored object can no longer appear
later in the trace. The proposal is that both usages can be improved by making
the unreachability of monitored objects explicit in the parametric property and
statically introducing additional instrumentation points generating related
events. The ideas presented in this paper are still exploratory and the
intention is to integrate the described techniques into the MarQ monitoring
tool for quantified event automata.Comment: In Proceedings PrePost 2017, arXiv:1708.0688
Monitoring-Oriented Programming: A Tool-Supported Methodology for Higher Quality Object-Oriented Software
This paper presents a tool-supported methodological paradigm for object-oriented software development, called monitoring-oriented programming and abbreviated MOP, in which runtime monitoring is a basic software design principle. The general idea underlying MOP is that software developers insert specifications in their code via annotations. Actual monitoring code is automatically synthesized from these annotations before compilation and integrated at appropriate places in the program, according to user-defined configuration attributes. This way, the specification is checked at runtime against the implementation. Moreover, violations and/or validations of specifications can trigger user-defined code at any points in the program, in particular recovery code, outputting or sending messages, or raising exceptions.
The MOP paradigm does not promote or enforce any specific formalism to specify requirements: it allows the users to plug-in their favorite or domain-specific specification formalisms via logic plug-in modules. There are two major technical challenges that MOP supporting tools unavoidably face: monitor synthesis and monitor integration. The former is heavily dependent on the specification formalism and comes as part of the corresponding logic plug-in, while the latter is uniform for all specification formalisms and depends only on the target programming language. An experimental prototype tool, called Java-MOP, is also discussed, which currently supports most but not all of the desired MOP features. MOP aims at reducing the gap between formal specification and implementation, by integrating the two and allowing them together to form a system
Efficient Monitoring of ??-languages
We present a technique for generating efficient monitors for Omega-regular-languages. We show how Buchi automata can be reduced in size and transformed into special, statistically optimal nondeterministic finite state machines, called binary transition tree finite state machines (BTT-FSMs), which recognize precisely the minimal bad prefixes of the original omega-regular-language. The presented technique is implemented as part of a larger monitoring framework and is available for download
Formal Verification of Security Protocol Implementations: A Survey
Automated formal verification of security protocols has been mostly focused on analyzing high-level abstract models which, however, are significantly different from real protocol implementations written in programming languages. Recently, some researchers have started investigating techniques that bring automated formal proofs closer to real implementations. This paper surveys these attempts, focusing on approaches that target the application code that implements protocol logic, rather than the libraries that implement cryptography. According to these approaches, libraries are assumed to correctly implement some models. The aim is to derive formal proofs that, under this assumption, give assurance about the application code that implements the protocol logic. The two main approaches of model extraction and code generation are presented, along with the main techniques adopted for each approac
ChimpCheck: Property-Based Randomized Test Generation for Interactive Apps
We consider the problem of generating relevant execution traces to test rich
interactive applications. Rich interactive applications, such as apps on mobile
platforms, are complex stateful and often distributed systems where
sufficiently exercising the app with user-interaction (UI) event sequences to
expose defects is both hard and time-consuming. In particular, there is a
fundamental tension between brute-force random UI exercising tools, which are
fully-automated but offer low relevance, and UI test scripts, which are manual
but offer high relevance. In this paper, we consider a middle way---enabling a
seamless fusion of scripted and randomized UI testing. This fusion is
prototyped in a testing tool called ChimpCheck for programming, generating, and
executing property-based randomized test cases for Android apps. Our approach
realizes this fusion by offering a high-level, embedded domain-specific
language for defining custom generators of simulated user-interaction event
sequences. What follows is a combinator library built on industrial strength
frameworks for property-based testing (ScalaCheck) and Android testing (Android
JUnit and Espresso) to implement property-based randomized testing for Android
development. Driven by real, reported issues in open source Android apps, we
show, through case studies, how ChimpCheck enables expressing effective testing
patterns in a compact manner.Comment: 20 pages, 21 figures, Symposium on New ideas, New Paradigms, and
Reflections on Programming and Software (Onward!2017
COST Action IC 1402 ArVI: Runtime Verification Beyond Monitoring -- Activity Report of Working Group 1
This report presents the activities of the first working group of the COST
Action ArVI, Runtime Verification beyond Monitoring. The report aims to provide
an overview of some of the major core aspects involved in Runtime Verification.
Runtime Verification is the field of research dedicated to the analysis of
system executions. It is often seen as a discipline that studies how a system
run satisfies or violates correctness properties. The report exposes a taxonomy
of Runtime Verification (RV) presenting the terminology involved with the main
concepts of the field. The report also develops the concept of instrumentation,
the various ways to instrument systems, and the fundamental role of
instrumentation in designing an RV framework. We also discuss how RV interplays
with other verification techniques such as model-checking, deductive
verification, model learning, testing, and runtime assertion checking. Finally,
we propose challenges in monitoring quantitative and statistical data beyond
detecting property violation
- …