826 research outputs found

    The prospects for mathematical logic in the twenty-first century

    Get PDF
    The four authors present their speculations about the future developments of mathematical logic in the twenty-first century. The areas of recursion theory, proof theory and logic for computer science, model theory, and set theory are discussed independently.Comment: Association for Symbolic Logi

    Expansions of MSO by cardinality relations

    Full text link
    We study expansions of the Weak Monadic Second Order theory of (N,<) by cardinality relations, which are predicates R(X1,...,Xn) whose truth value depends only on the cardinality of the sets X1, ...,Xn. We first provide a (definable) criterion for definability of a cardinality relation in (N,<), and use it to prove that for every cardinality relation R which is not definable in (N,<), there exists a unary cardinality relation which is definable in (N,<,R) and not in (N,<). These results resemble Muchnik and Michaux-Villemaire theorems for Presburger Arithmetic. We prove then that + and x are definable in (N,<,R) for every cardinality relation R which is not definable in (N,<). This implies undecidability of the WMSO theory of (N,<,R). We also consider the related satisfiability problem for the class of finite orderings, namely the question whether an MSO sentence in the language {<,R} admits a finite model M where < is interpreted as a linear ordering, and R as the restriction of some (fixed) cardinality relation to the domain of M. We prove that this problem is undecidable for every cardinality relation R which is not definable in (N,<).Comment: to appear in LMC

    Conditionals and modularity in general logics

    Full text link
    In this work in progress, we discuss independence and interpolation and related topics for classical, modal, and non-monotonic logics

    An Application of the Feferman-Vaught Theorem to Automata and Logics for<br> Words over an Infinite Alphabet

    Full text link
    We show that a special case of the Feferman-Vaught composition theorem gives rise to a natural notion of automata for finite words over an infinite alphabet, with good closure and decidability properties, as well as several logical characterizations. We also consider a slight extension of the Feferman-Vaught formalism which allows to express more relations between component values (such as equality), and prove related decidability results. From this result we get new classes of decidable logics for words over an infinite alphabet.Comment: 24 page

    Decidability of definability issues in the theory of real addition

    Full text link
    Given a subset of X⊆RnX\subseteq \mathbb{R}^{n} we can associate with every point x∈Rnx\in \mathbb{R}^{n} a vector space VV of maximal dimension with the property that for some ball centered at xx, the subset XX coincides inside the ball with a union of lines parallel with VV. A point is singular if VV has dimension 00. In an earlier paper we proved that a (R,+,<,Z)(\mathbb{R}, +,< ,\mathbb{Z})-definable relation XX is actually definable in (R,+,<,1)(\mathbb{R}, +,< ,1) if and only if the number of singular points is finite and every rational section of XX is (R,+,<,1)(\mathbb{R}, +,< ,1)-definable, where a rational section is a set obtained from XX by fixing some component to a rational value. Here we show that we can dispense with the hypothesis of XX being (R,+,<,Z)(\mathbb{R}, +,< ,\mathbb{Z})-definable by assuming that the components of the singular points are rational numbers. This provides a topological characterization of first-order definability in the structure (R,+,<,1)(\mathbb{R}, +,< ,1). It also allows us to deliver a self-definable criterion (in Muchnik's terminology) of (R,+,<,1)(\mathbb{R}, +,< ,1)- and (R,+,<,Z)(\mathbb{R}, +,< ,\mathbb{Z})-definability for a wide class of relations, which turns into an effective criterion provided that the corresponding theory is decidable. In particular these results apply to the class of k−k-recognizable relations on reals, and allow us to prove that it is decidable whether a k−k-recognizable relation (of any arity) is l−l-recognizable for every base l≥2l \geq 2.Comment: added sections 5 and 6, typos corrected. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2002.0428
    • …
    corecore