94 research outputs found

    The Expressive Power of CSP-Quantifiers

    Get PDF
    A generalized quantifier QK is called a CSP-quantifier if its defining class K consists of all structures that can be homomorphically mapped to a fixed finite template structure. For all positive integers n ≥ 2 and k, we define a pebble game that characterizes equivalence of structures with respect to the logic Lk∞ω(CSP+n ), where CSP+n is the union of the class Q1 of all unary quantifiers and the class CSPn of all CSP-quantifiers with template structures that have at most n elements. Using these games we prove that for every n ≥ 2 there exists a CSP-quantifier with template of size n + 1 which is not definable in Lω∞ω(CSP+n ). The proof of this result is based on a new variation of the well-known Cai-Fürer-Immerman construction.publishedVersionPeer reviewe

    Beyond Hypertree Width: Decomposition Methods Without Decompositions

    Full text link
    The general intractability of the constraint satisfaction problem has motivated the study of restrictions on this problem that permit polynomial-time solvability. One major line of work has focused on structural restrictions, which arise from restricting the interaction among constraint scopes. In this paper, we engage in a mathematical investigation of generalized hypertree width, a structural measure that has up to recently eluded study. We obtain a number of computational results, including a simple proof of the tractability of CSP instances having bounded generalized hypertree width

    Upper and lower bounds for first order expressibility

    Get PDF
    AbstractWe study first order expressibility as a measure of complexity. We introduce the new class Var&Sz[v(n),z(n)] of languages expressible by a uniform sequence of sentences with v(n) variables and size O[z(n)]. When v(n) is constant our uniformity condition is syntactical and thus the following characterizations of P and PSPACE come entirely from logic. NSPACE|log n|⊆⋃k=1,2,…Var&Sz|k, log(n)|⊆DSPACE|log2(n)|,P=⋃k=1,2,…Var&Sz|k, nk|,PSPACE=⋃k=1,2,…Var&Sz|k, 2nk|. The above means, for example, that the properties expressible with constantly many variables in polynomial size sentences are just the polynomial time recognizable properties. These results hold for languages with an ordering relation, e.g., for graphs the vertices are numbered. We introduce an “alternating pebbling game” to prove lower bounds on the number of variables and size needed to express properties without the ordering. We show, for example, that k variables are needed to express Clique(k), suggesting that this problem requires DTIME[nk]

    Dependence Logic with Generalized Quantifiers: Axiomatizations

    Full text link
    We prove two completeness results, one for the extension of dependence logic by a monotone generalized quantifier Q with weak interpretation, weak in the meaning that the interpretation of Q varies with the structures. The second result considers the extension of dependence logic where Q is interpreted as "there exists uncountable many." Both of the axiomatizations are shown to be sound and complete for FO(Q) consequences.Comment: 17 page

    Structure Theorem and Strict Alternation Hierarchy for FO² on Words

    Get PDF
    It is well-known that every first-order property on words is expressible using at most three variables. The subclass of properties expressible with only two variables is also quite interesting and well-studied. We prove precise structure theorems that characterize the exact expressive power of first-order logic with two variables on words. Our results apply to FO2[<]^2[<] and FO2[<,suc]^2[<,suc], the latter of which includes the binary successor relation in addition to the linear ordering on string positions. For both languages, our structure theorems show exactly what is expressible using a given quantifier depth, nn, and using mm blocks of alternating quantifiers, for any mleqnmleq n. Using these characterizations, we prove, among other results, that there is a strict hierarchy of alternating quantifiers for both languages. The question whether there was such a hierarchy had been completely open since it was asked in [Etessami, Vardi, and Wilke 1997]
    corecore