53,887 research outputs found
Guidance on the principles of language accessibility in National Curriculum Assessments : research background
This review accompanies the document, which describes the principles which should guide the development of clear assessment questions. The purpose of the review is to present and discuss in detail the research underpinning these principles. It begins from the standpoint that National Curriculum assessments, indeed any assessments, should be:
- appropriate to the age of the pupils
- an effective measure of their abilities, skills and concept development
- fair to all irrespective of gender, language, religion, ethnic or social origin or disability. (Ofqual, 2011)
The Regulatory Framework for National Assessments: National Curriculum and Early Years Foundation Stage (Ofqual, 2011) sets out a number of common criteria which apply to all aspects of the development and implementation of National Assessments. One of these criteria refers to the need for assessment procedures to minimise bias: âThe assessment should minimise bias, differentiating only on the basis of each learnerâs ability to meet National Curriculum requirementsâ (Section 5.39, page 16). The Framework goes on to argue that: âMinimising bias is about ensuring that an assessment does not produce unreasonably adverse outcomes for particular groups of learnersâ (Annex 1, page 29). This criterion reinforces the guiding principle that any form of assessment should provide information about the knowledge and understanding of relevant content material. That is to say that the means through which this knowledge and understanding is examined, the design of the assessment and the language used should as far as possible be transparent, and should not influence adversely the performance of those being assessed.
There is clearly a large number of ways in which any given assessment task can be presented and in which questions can be asked. Some of these ways will make the task more accessible â that is, easier to complete successfully â and some will get in the way of successful completion. Section 26 of the Fair Access by Design (Ofqual, 2010) document lists a number of guiding principles for improving the accessibility of assessment questions, although the research basis for these principles is not made completely clear in that document. The aim of the current review is to examine the research background more closely in order to provide a more substantial basis for a renewed set of principles to underpin the concept of language accessibility.
In the review, each section will be prefaced by a statement of the principles outlined in Guidance on the Principles of Language Accessibility in National Curriculum Assessments and then the research evidence underpinning these principles will be reviewed
'The Work of Teacher Education' : Final Research Report
Partnership teacher education â in which schools work with universities and colleges to train teachers â works and there is abundant existing evidence in support of this fact. But our small-scale study across England and Scotland shows that it is the higher education tutor who seems to make it work, often at the cost of research-informed teaching and research. The most time-intensive activity for the higher education tutors in our sample was maintaining relationships with schools and between schools and individual trainee teachers. The need to maintain relationships to such a degree is caused in part by the creation of a marketplace of âprovidersâ of teacher education who compete for funding on the basis of inspection and quality assurance data and also by the very early school placements that characterise the English model of initial teacher education in comparison to other European models such as that of Finland
Topic Modelling of Everyday Sexism Project Entries
The Everyday Sexism Project documents everyday examples of sexism reported by
volunteer contributors from all around the world. It collected 100,000 entries
in 13+ languages within the first 3 years of its existence. The content of
reports in various languages submitted to Everyday Sexism is a valuable source
of crowdsourced information with great potential for feminist and gender
studies. In this paper, we take a computational approach to analyze the content
of reports. We use topic-modelling techniques to extract emerging topics and
concepts from the reports, and to map the semantic relations between those
topics. The resulting picture closely resembles and adds to that arrived at
through qualitative analysis, showing that this form of topic modeling could be
useful for sifting through datasets that had not previously been subject to any
analysis. More precisely, we come up with a map of topics for two different
resolutions of our topic model and discuss the connection between the
identified topics. In the low resolution picture, for instance, we found Public
space/Street, Online, Work related/Office, Transport, School, Media harassment,
and Domestic abuse. Among these, the strongest connection is between Public
space/Street harassment and Domestic abuse and sexism in personal
relationships.The strength of the relationships between topics illustrates the
fluid and ubiquitous nature of sexism, with no single experience being
unrelated to another.Comment: preprint, under revie
Marriage, Violence, and Choice:Understanding Dalit women's agency in rural Tamil Nadu
Literature on Dalit women largely deals with issues of violence and oppression based on intersections of class, caste and gender. Womenâs bodies, sexuality and reproductive choices are linked to the ideological hegemony of the caste-gender nexus in India, with marriage and sexual relations critical in maintaining caste boundaries. Often the ways in which women manipulate their multiple, interlinked identities as women, Dalits, workers and home-makers to resist control over their bodies (labour and sexuality), negotiate conjugal loyalty and love, and construct a sense of selfhood is missed in the analyses. Based on research in rural Tamil Nadu, I analyse in this paper Dalit womenâs narratives that reflect multiple concerns and dilemmas about marital choice and violence, generating in the process a deeper understanding of agency, voice and gender relations, as fluid, dynamic, and intersecting in response to changing experiences, positionalities and subjectivities
Recommended from our members
Measuring Whatâs Valued Or Valuing Whatâs Measured? Knowledge Production and the Research Assessment Exercise
Power is everywhere. But what is it and how does it infuse personal and institutional relationships in higher education? Power, Knowledge and the Academy: The Institutional is Political takes a close-up and critical look at both the elusive and blatant workings and consequences of power in a range of everyday sites in universities. Authors work with multi-layered conceptions of power to disturb the idea of the academy as a haven of detached reason and instead reveal the ways in which power shapes personal and institutional relationships, the production of knowledge and the construction of academic careers. Chapters focus on, among other areas, student-supervisor relationships, personal PhD journeys, power in research teams, networking, the Research Assessment Exercise in the UK, and the power to construct knowledge in literature reviews.
This chapter does not address which mechanism of research assessment provides a more truthful account of the value of a set of âresearch outputsâ. Instead, it focuses on the power of any such mechanism to reinforce particular values and to inscribe hierarchies regarding knowledge. Regardless of what replaces it, the UK's RAE will have been productive, not just reflective of academic values. Some of the negative consequences of the RAE for UK academic life are considered, focusing on the operation of power through processes of knowledge production
- âŠ