458 research outputs found

    Comparing the impact of power supply voltage on CMOS-and FinFET-based SRAMs in the presence of resistive defects

    Get PDF
    CMOS technology scaling has reached its limit at the 22 nm technology node due to several factors including Process Variations (PV), increased leakage current, Random Dopant Fluctuation (RDF), and mainly the Short-Channel Effect (SCE). In order to continue the miniaturization process via technology down-scaling while preserving system reliability and performance, Fin Field-Effect Transistors (FinFETs) arise as an alternative to CMOS transistors. In parallel, Static Random-Access Memories (SRAMs) increasingly occupy great part of Systems-on-Chipsโ€™ (SoCs) silicon area, making their reliability an important issue. SRAMs are designed to reach densities at the limit of the manufacturing process, making this component susceptible to manufacturing defects, including the resistive ones. Such defects may cause dynamic faults during the circuitsโ€™ lifetime, an important cause of test escape. Thus, the identification of the proper faulty behavior taking different operating conditions into account is considered crucial to guarantee the development of more suitable test methodologies. In this context, a comparison between the behavior of a 22 nm CMOS-based and a 20 nm FinFET-based SRAM in the presence of resistive defects is carried out considering different power supply voltages. In more detail, the behavior of defective cells operating under different power supply voltages has been investigated performing SPICE simulations. Results show that the power supply voltage plays an important role in the faulty behavior of both CMOS- and FinFET-based SRAM cells in the presence of resistive defects but demonstrate to be more expressive when considering the FinFET-based memories. Studying different operating temperatures, the results show an expressively higher occurrence of dynamic faults in FinFET-based SRAMs when compared to CMOS technology

    Technology CAD of Nanowire FinFETs

    Get PDF

    Silicon Nanowire FinFETs

    Get PDF

    ํ•€ํŽซ ์†Œ์ž์—์„œ์˜ ํ•ซ์บ๋ฆฌ์–ด ์‹ ๋ขฐ์„ฑ ๋ถ„์„

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์ „๊ธฐยท์ •๋ณด๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2021. 2. ์‹ ํ˜•์ฒ .CMOS ๋กœ์ง ์†Œ์ž๋Š” ํผํฌ๋จผ์Šค๋ฅผ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ง€์†์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ถ•์†Œํ™” ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ๊ตฌ์กฐ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ๋“ค์˜ ์ถ•์†Œํ™”์— ๋น„ํ•ด ๋™์ž‘ ์ „์••์€ ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํžˆ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š”๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์†Œ์ž ๋‚ด ์ˆ˜์ง ์ „๊ณ„๋‚˜ ์˜จ๋„๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ์ถ”์„ธ์ด๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์‹ ๋ขฐ์„ฑ์€ ๊ณ„์†ํ•ด์„œ ๋ฌธ์ œ๊ฐ€ ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ตœ๊ทผ 3D ์†Œ์ž์˜ ์‹ ๋ขฐ์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋งŽ์ด ์ง„ํ–‰๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ empirical ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์ด๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์‹ค์ œ ์ธก์ •์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ์ด๋ก  ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ ๋กœ์ง ์†Œ์ž์˜ ํ•ซ์บ๋ฆฌ์–ด ์‹ ๋ขฐ์„ฑ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋จผ์ € ํ•ซ์บ๋ฆฌ์–ด ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์ •ํ™•์„ฑ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ TCAD ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์— electron-electron scattering์„ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์œผ๋กœ 3D FinFET์˜ ์ธก์ • ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์™€ calibration์„ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์ •ํ•ฉ์„ฑ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. calibration ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ๋Š” ๋ชจ๋“  scattering ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ „์••๊ณผ ์˜จ๋„ ์กฐ๊ฑด์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ „์•• ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ HCD๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ณ , calibration์„ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ HCD ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ถœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์Œ์œผ๋กœ ์ „์•• ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ HCD์˜ ์˜จ๋„ ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์„ฑ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. oxide trap๊ณผ ๋‹ฌ๋ฆฌ interface trap์€ ์ „์•• ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์˜จ๋„ ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์ธ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ interface trap์„ 3๊ฐ€์ง€ ์„ฑ๋ถ„์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„๋ฆฌํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐ ์„ฑ๋ถ„์˜ ์˜จ๋„ ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์„ฑ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. Multiple particle process(MP)๊ณผ field enhanced thermal degradation process(FP)๋Š” ์ „์•• ์กฐ๊ฑด๊ณผ ์ƒ๊ด€์—†์ด ์ผ์ •ํ•œ ์˜จ๋„ ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„๋‹ค. ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด Single particle process(SP)๋Š” scattering์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฐ›๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์˜จ๋„ ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์„ฑ์€ ์ „์•• ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋‹ฌ๋ผ์ง„๋‹ค. ์˜จ๋„ ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์„ฑ ๋ถ„์„ ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ๋„ calibration์„ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๋ฒˆ์˜ iteration์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ „์•• ๋ฐ ์˜จ๋„๊ฐ€ ๊ณ ๋ ค๋œ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ถœํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ถ”์ถœ๋œ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ ์šฉํ•œ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋” ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ HCD ์ธก์ • ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ์ด๋ก ์— ๊ทผ๊ฑฐํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ HCD ๋ถ„์„์˜ ์ •ํ™•์„ฑ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œ์ผฐ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ๊ฐ€์† ์กฐ๊ฑด๊ณผ ๋™์ž‘ ์กฐ๊ฑด์˜ self-heating ํšจ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ๋‹ค๋ฅด๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์†Œ์ž๊ฐ€ ์‹ค์ œ CMOS ํšŒ๋กœ์˜ ๋™์ž‘ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ interface trap์„ ๋ฐœ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์€ ๋‹ค๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๋™์ž‘ ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ์˜ ๊ฐ ์„ฑ๋ถ„์˜ ๋น„์œจ๊นŒ์ง€ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” 10 nm node ์†Œ์ž์—์„œ nFinFET์— ๋น„ํ•ด pFinFET์—์„œ ๋†’์€ ์—ดํ™”๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ์›์ธ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. pFinFET์€ ์†Œ์Šค/๋“œ๋ ˆ์ธ ๋ฌผ์งˆ๋กœ SiGe๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— nFinFET์— ๋น„ํ•ด self-heating ํšจ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์‹ฌํ•˜์—ฌ ์†Œ์ž ์˜จ๋„๊ฐ€ ๋„ ๋†’๋‹ค. ์ด๋ก ์ ์œผ๋กœ MP ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์˜ lifetime์€ ์˜จ๋„๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ• ์ˆ˜๋ก ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— MP์— ์˜ํ•œ ์—ดํ™” ๋˜ํ•œ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์†Œ์ž ์˜จ๋„๊ฐ€ ๋” ๋†’์€ pFinFET์—์„œ nFinFET์— ๋น„ํ•ด ๋” ๋งŽ์€ MP๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๊ธฐ ์–ด๋ ต๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ nFinFET ๊ณผ ๋‹ฌ๋ฆฌ pFinFET์—์„œ๋Š” Si-H bond์˜ electron๊ณผ hole์ด ๋ฐ˜์‘ํ•˜์—ฌ interface trap์„ ์ƒ์„ฑ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” RD ๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ RD๋Š” ์˜จ๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’์„์ˆ˜๋ก ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ์—ดํ™”๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์—, pFinFET์—์„œ nFinFET๋ณด๋‹ค ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ์—ดํ™”๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ํ˜„์ƒ์„ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” HCD ์กฐ๊ฑด์ด์ง€๋งŒ ์†Œ์ž ์˜จ๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’์€ pFinFET์—์„œ ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์ธ RD ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ „์•• ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ์˜ ์ „๋ฅ˜ ์—ดํ™”์œจ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ฃผ์š” ์—ดํ™” ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ pFinFET์—์„œ๋Š” RD๊ฐ€ ์ฃผ์š”ํ•จ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ TCAD ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ HCD ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” RD๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ทธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ RD๋ฅผ ์ œ์™ธํ•œ ์ˆœ์ˆ˜ hot carrier ์„ฑ๋ถ„์€ pFinFET๋ณด๋‹ค nFinFET์—์„œ ๋” ๋งŽ์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•œ๋‹ค.CMOS logic devices have been scaled down to improve performance. However, the operating voltage is not sufficiently reduced compared to the scale down in physical dimensions. Therefore, since the electric field and temperature of the device gradually increase, reliability is still a critical issue in logic devices. Recently, many studies on the reliability of 3D devices are being conducted, but most of the studies are related to empirical modeling. Therefore, in this study, based on the actual measurement results, the hot carrier degradation(HCD) reliability of the logic device was analyzed focusing on the physical theory using Technology computer-aided design (TCAD) simulation. First, electron-electron scattering(EES) was applied to the TCAD simulation to improve the accuracy of the hot carrier model. Additionally, calibration between the measurement data of 14 nm node FinFET and the model was performed to confirm the consistency. The calibration process required various voltage and temperature conditions to account for all scattering mechanisms. Therefore, HCD was analyzed according to various voltage conditions, and the parameters of the HCD model were extracted by calibration process. Next, temperature dependence under various HCD conditions was analyzed. Unlike oxide traps, interface traps show different temperature dependence depending on HCD voltage conditions. Therefore, the interface traps were separated into three components and the temperature dependence was analyzed for each component. Multiple particle process (MP) and Field enhanced thermal degradation process (FP) have a constant temperature dependence regardless of voltage conditions. On the other hand, the temperature dependence of Single particle process (SP) varies depending on the voltage condition because SP is affected by scattering. In the process of temperature dependence analysis, calibration is also performed and parameters considering various voltages and temperatures were extracted through several iterations. The improved model to which the extracted parameters were applied showed more precise prediction of degradation compared to that of the previous model. As a results, accuracy of the HCD analysis was improved by establishing the HCD simulation framework based on physical theories. However, since the self-heating effect of the acceleration condition and the operation condition are different, the HCD mechanism that occurs in the actual CMOS circuit may also be different. Therefore, we predicted the ratio of each component under operating condition. Finally, in 10 nm node devices, we analyzed the cause of higher HCD in pFinFETs than in nFinFETs. Self-heating effect is severe in pFinFETs because SiGe is used as the source/drain material which makes the device temperature higher than nFinFETs. Theoretically, because the lifetime of multiple particle(MP) mechanism decreases as temperature increases, degradation due to MP decreases. Therefore, it is difficult for the HCD mechanisms to occur more in pFinFETs which has higher temperature than nFinFETs. However, in pFinFETs unlike nFinFETs, reaction-diffusion (RD) mechanism can occur in which holes react with the electrons of Si-H bonds to generate interface traps. Also, since RD deteriorates more as the temperature increases, the phenomenon that more degradation occurs in pFinFET than nFinFET can be explained by the RD mechanism. Therefore, we propose an additional RD mechanism that is caused by high device temperature in pFinFETs even in HCD condition. Main components were investigated through measurements of current degradation rate in various voltage conditions, and it was found that RD is dominant in pFinFETs. Also, RD that can occur in HCD condition was predicted through TCAD simulation. As a results, degradation due to pure hot carriers without RD occurs more in nFinFETs than in pFinFETs.Abstract i Chapter 1. Introduction 1 Chapter 2. Hot Carrier Degradation Model 4 2.1. Physical theory 4 2.2. TCAD simulation 8 2.3. Calibration process 14 2.4. Summary 22 Chapter 3. Analysis on Temperature Dependence of HCD 25 3.1. Introduction 25 3.2. Temperature dependence according to acceleration conditions 26 3.3. Calibration process 30 3.4. Mechanism separation 33 3.5. HCD prediction in the nominal voltage 35 3.6. Summary 36 Chapter 4. Comparative Analysis of HCD in nMOS/pMOS FinFET 39 4.1. Introduction 39 4.2. Comparison of HCD in the long/short channel FinFET 40 4.3. Self-heating effect in n/pFinFET 44 4.4. Bias Temperature Instability(BTI) in n/pFinFET 47 4.5. Summary 59 Chapter 5. Conclusion 64 Abstract in Korean 66 List of Publications 69Docto

    Development of a fully-depleted thin-body FinFET process

    Get PDF
    The goal of this work is to develop the processes needed for the demonstration of a fully-depleted (FD) thin-body fin field effect transistor (FinFET). Recognized by the 2003 International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors as an emerging non-classical CMOS technology, FinFETs exhibit high drive current, reduced short-channel effects, an extreme scalability to deep submicron regimes. The approach used in this study will build on previous FinFET research, along with new concepts and technologies. The critical aspects of this research are: (1) thin body creation using spacer etchmasks and oxidation/etchback schemes, (2) use of an oxynitride gate dielectric, (3) silicon crystal orientation effect evaluation, and (4) creation of fully-depleted FinFET devices of submicron gate length on Silicon-on-Insulator (SOI) substrates. The developed process yielded functional FinFETs of both thin body and wide body variety. Electrical tests were employed to describe device behaviour, including their subthreshold characteristics, standard operation, effects of gate misalignment on device performance, and impact of crystal orientation on device drive current. The process is shown to have potential for deep submicron regimes of fin width and gate length, and provides a good foundation for further research of FinFETs and similar technologies at RIT

    Electrical characterization of high-k gate dielectrics for advanced CMOS gate stacks

    Get PDF
    The oxide/substrate interface quality and the dielectric quality of metal oxide semiconductor (MOS) gate stack structures are critical to future CMOS technology. As SiO2 was replaced by the high-k dielectric to further equivalent oxide thickness (EOT), high mobility substrates like Ge have attracted increasing in replacing Si substrate to further enhance devices performance. Precise control of the interface between high-k and the semiconductor substrate is the key of the high performance of future transistor. In this study, traditional electrical characterization methods are used on these novel MOS devices, prepared by advanced atomic layer deposition (ALD) process and with pre and post treatment by plasma generated by slot plane antenna (SPA). MOS capacitors with a TiN metal gate/3 nm HfAlO/0.5 nm SiO2/Si stacks were fabricated by different Al concentration, and different post deposition treatments. A simple approach is incorporated to correct the error, introduced by the series resistance (Rs) associated with the substrate and metal contact. The interface state density (Dit), calculated by conductance method, suggests that Dit is dependent on the crystalline structure of hafnium aluminum oxide film. The amorphous structure has the lowest Dit whereas crystallized HfO2 has the highest Dit. Subsequently, the dry and wet processed interface layers for three different p type Ge/ALD 1nm-Al2O3/ALD 3.5nm-ZrO2/ALD TiN gate stacks are studied at low temperatures by capacitance-voltage (CV),conductance-voltage (GV) measurement and deep level transient spectroscopy (DLTS). Prior to high-k deposition, the interface is treated by three different approaches (i) simple chemical oxidation (Chemox); (ii) chemical oxide removal (COR) followed by 1 nm oxide by slot-plane-antenna (SPA) plasma (COR&SPAOx); and (iii) COR followed by vapor O3 treatment (COR&O3). Room temperature measurement indicates that superior results are observed for slot-plane-plasma-oxidation processed samples. The reliability of TiN/ZrO2/Al2O3/p-Ge gate stacks is studied by time dependent dielectric breakdown (TDDB). High-k dielectric is subjected to the different slot plane antenna oxidation (SPAO) processes, namely, (i) before high-k ALD (Atomic Layer Deposition), (ii) between high-k ALD, and (iii) after high-k ALD. High-k layer and interface states are improved due to the formation of GeO2 by SPAO when SPAO is processed after high-k. GeO2 at the interface can be degraded easily by substrate electron injection. When SPAO is processed between high-k layers, a better immunity of interface to degradation was observed under stress. To further evaluate the high-k dielectrics and how EOT impacts on noise mechanism time zero 1/f noise is characterized on thick and thin oxide FinFET transistors, respectively. The extracted noise models suggest that as a function of temperatures and bias conditions the flicker noise mechanism tends to be carrier number fluctuation model (McWhorter model). Furthermore, the noise mechanism tends to be mobility fluctuation model (Hooge model) when EOT reduces
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore