Robust stabilization of LPV systems with structured uncertainty using minimax controllers

This paper addresses a robust control scheduling scheme for uncertain linear parameter-varying systems with structured uncertainty. A gain-scheduled controller is proposed which employs a set of minimax optimal robust controllers and incorporates an interpolation rule to achieve continuity of the controller gain over a range of operating conditions. Novel weighted time-domain integral quadratic constraints are introduced to assist in the derivation of the controller. The key idea of the interpolation for the structured uncertainty case is to transform the parameterized algebraic Riccati inequalities into equivalent linear matrix inequalities. For every fixed value of the system parameter, the proposed controller guarantees robust stability and a certain bound on the worst-case performance of the corresponding uncertain closed loop system. Furthermore, a bound on the rate of parameter variations is obtained under which the closed loop LPV system is robustly stable. To obtain the proposed controller, a set of semi-definite programming problems are introduced; this enables an efficient numerical solution to the problem under consideration. © 2007 IEEE

ℋ∞ optimization with spatial constraints

A generalized ℋ∞ synthesis problem where non-euclidian spatial norms on the disturbances and output error are used is posed and solved. The solution takes the form of a linear matrix inequality. Some problems which fall into this class are presented. In particular, solutions are presented to two problems: a variant of ℋ∞ synthesis where norm constraints on each component of the disturbance can be imposed, and synthesis for a certain class of robust performance problems

Dynamical Analysis and Robust Control Synthesis for Water Treatment Processes

Nowadays, water demand and water scarcity are very urgent issues due to population growth, drought and poor water quality all over the world. Therefore, water treatment plants are playing a vital role for good living condition of human. Water area needs more concentration study to increase water productivity and decrease water cost. This dissertation presents the analysis and control of water treatment plants using robust control techniques. The applied control algorithms include H∞, gain scheduled and observer-based loop-shaping control technique. They are modern control algorithms and very powerful in robust controlling of systems with uncertainties and disturbances. The water treatment plants include a desalination system and a wastewater process. Since fresh water scarcity is getting more serious, the desalination plants are to produce drinking water and wastewater treatment plants give the reusable water. The desalination system is a RO one used to produce drinking water from seawater and brackish water. The nonlinear behaviors of this system is carefully analyzed before the linearization. Due to the uncertainty caused by concentration polarization, the system is linearized using linear state-space parametric uncertainty framework. The system also suffer from many disturbances which water hammer is one of the most influential one. The mixed robust H∞ and μ-synthesis control algorithm is applied to control the RO system coping with large uncertainties, disturbances and noises. The wastewater treatment process is an activated sludge process. This biological process use microorganisms to convert organic and certain inorganic matter from wastewater into cell mass. The process is very complex with many coupled biological and chemical reactions. Due to the large variation in the influent flow, the system is modelized and linearized as a linear parametric varying system using affine parameter-dependent representation. Since the influent flow is quickly variable and easily to be measured, the robust gain scheduled robust controller is applied to deal with the large uncertainty caused by the scheduled parameter. This control algorithm often gives better performances than those of general robust H∞ one. In the wastewater treatment plant, there exist an anaerobic digestion, which is controlled by the observer-based loop-shaping algorithm. The simulations show that all the controllers can effectively deal with large uncertainties, disturbances and noises in water treatment plants. They help improve the system performances and safeties, save energy and reduce product water costs. The studies contribute some potential control approaches for water treatment plants, which is currently a very active research area in the world.Contents ······················································································· iv List of Tables ··············································································· viii List of Figures ··············································································· ix Chapter 1. Introduction ···································································· 1 1.1 Reverse osmosis process ···································································· 2 1.2 Activated sludge process ···································································· 6 1.3 Robust H∞ and gain scheduling control ··················································· 10 Chapter 2. Robust H∞ controller ······················································· 13 2.1 Introduction ·················································································· 13 2.2 Uncertainty modelling ······································································ 13 2.2.1 Unstructured uncertainties ···························································· 14 2.2.2 Parametric uncertainties ······························································· 15 2.2.3 Structured uncertainties ································································ 16 2.2.4 Linear fractional transformation ······················································ 16 2.3 Stability criterion ············································································ 17 2.3.1 Small gain theorem ····································································· 17 2.3.2 Structured singular value (muy) synthesis brief definition ·························· 19 2.4 Robustness analysis and controller design ··············································· 20 2.4.1 Forming generalised plant and N-delta structure ····································· 20 2.4.2 Robustness analysis ···································································· 24 2.5 Reduced controller ·········································································· 26 2.5.1 Truncation ··············································································· 27 2.5.2 Residualization ········································································· 29 2.5.3 Balanced realization···································································· 29 2.5.4 Optimal Hankel norm approximation ················································ 31 Chapter 3. Robust gain scheduling controller ······································· 37 3.1 Introduction ·················································································· 37 3.2 Linear parameter varying (LPV) system ·················································· 39 3.3 Matrix Polytope ·············································································· 40 3.4 Polytope and affine parameter-dependent representation ······························· 41 3.4.1 Polytope representation ································································ 41 3.4.2 Affine parameter-dependent representation ········································· 42 3.5 Quadratic stability of LPV systems and quadratic (robust) H∞ performance ········· 43 3.6 Robust gain scheduling ····································································· 44 3.6.1 LPV system linearization ······························································ 44 3.6.2 Polytope-based gain scheduling ······················································ 45 3.6.3 LFT-based gain scheduling ··························································· 48 Chapter 4. Mixed robust H∞ and μ-synthesis controller applied for a reverse osmosis desalination system ····························································· 52 4.1 RO principles ················································································ 52 4.1.1 Osmosis and reverse osmosis ························································· 52 4.1.2 Dead-end filtration and cross-flow filtration ········································ 53 4.2 Membranes ··················································································· 54 4.2.1 Structure and material ································································· 54 4.2.2 Hollow fine fiber membrane module ················································ 55 4.2.3 Spiral wound membrane module ····················································· 57 4.3 Nonlinear RO modelling and analysis ···················································· 58 4.3.1 RO system introduction ······························································· 58 4.3.2 Modelling ··············································································· 60 4.3.3 Nonlinear analysis ······································································ 62 4.3.4 Concentration polarization ···························································· 64 4.4 Water hammer phenomenon ······························································· 66 4.4.1 Water hammer, column separation and vaporous cavitation ······················ 66 4.4.2 Water hammer analysis and simulation ·············································· 69 4.4.3 Prevention of water hammer effect··················································· 78 4.5 RO linearization ············································································· 79 4.5.1 Nominal linearization ·································································· 79 4.5.2 Uncertainty modeling ·································································· 81 4.5.3 Parametric uncertainty linearization ················································· 83 4.6 Robust H∞ controller design for RO system ·············································· 85 4.6.1 Control of uncertain RO system ······················································ 85 4.6.2 Robustness analysis and H∞ controller design ······································ 86 4.7 Simulation result and discussion··························································· 90 4.8 Conclusion ··················································································· 95 Chapter 5. Robust gain scheduling control of activated sludge process ······· 96 5.1 Introduction about activated sludge process ············································· 96 5.1.1 State variables ·········································································· 98 5.1.2 ASM1 processes ······································································ 100 5.1.3 The control problem of activated sludge process ································· 102 5.2 System modelling ········································································· 104 5.3 Model linearization ········································································ 107 5.4 Robust gain-schedule controller design for activated sludge process ··············· 109 5.5 Simulation result and discussion························································· 115 5.6 Conclusion ················································································· 120 Chapter 6. Observer-based loop-shaping control of anaerobic digestion ···· 121 6.1 Introduction ················································································ 121 6.1.1 Control problem in anaerobic digestion ··········································· 122 6.2 System modelling ········································································· 123 6.3 Controller design ·········································································· 124 6.3.1 H∞ loop-shaping controller ························································· 125 6.3.2 Coprime factor uncertainty ·························································· 126 6.3.3 Control synthesis ····································································· 127 6.4 Simulation result ··········································································· 131 6.5 Conclusion ················································································· 133 Chapter 7. Conclusion ··································································· 134 References ·················································································· 136 Appendices ················································································· 144Docto

Shape-independent model predictive control for Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy systems

[EN] Predictive control of TS fuzzy systems has been addressed in prior literature with some simplifying assumptions or heuristic approaches. This paper presents a rigorous formulation of the model predictive control of TS systems, so that results are valid for any membership value (shape-independent) with a suitable account of causality (control can depend on current and past memberships and state). As in most fuzzy control results, a family of progressively better controllers can be obtained by increasing Polya-related complexity parameters, generalising over prior proposals. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.The authors are grateful to the financial support of Spanish Ministry of Economy and European Union, grant DPI2016-81002-R (AEI/FEDER, UE), and grant P11B2015-36 (Universitat Jaume I).Ariño-Latorre, CV.; Querol-Ferrer, A.; Sala, A. (2017). Shape-independent model predictive control for Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy systems. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. 65:493-505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2017.07.011S4935056

An Overview of Integral Quadratic Constraints for Delayed Nonlinear and Parameter-Varying Systems

A general framework is presented for analyzing the stability and performance of nonlinear and linear parameter varying (LPV) time delayed systems. First, the input/output behavior of the time delay operator is bounded in the frequency domain by integral quadratic constraints (IQCs). A constant delay is a linear, time-invariant system and this leads to a simple, intuitive interpretation for these frequency domain constraints. This simple interpretation is used to derive new IQCs for both constant and varying delays. Second, the performance of nonlinear and LPV delayed systems is bounded using dissipation inequalities that incorporate IQCs. This step makes use of recent results that show, under mild technical conditions, that an IQC has an equivalent representation as a finite-horizon time-domain constraint. Numerical examples are provided to demonstrate the effectiveness of the method for both class of systems

Robust Control of Delayed Fin Stabilizer Stochastic Systems of a Ship

In this paper, the robust control problem of delayed fin stabilizer stochastic system of a ship with uncertainty is discussed and investigated. To describe the system, Linear Parameter Varying (LPV) modelling approach and multiplicative noise term are used to establish the corresponding polynomial model. For simulating the general operating environment, the delay effect is considered as time-varying case. Moreover, the gain-scheduled control scheme is employed to discuss the delay-dependent stabilization problem and to design the corresponding controller. Moreover, a novel Lyapunov-Kravoskii function is proposed by using parameter-dependent matrix and integral Lyapunov function to reduce the conservatism of the derived stability conditions. In order to apply the convex optimization algorithm, the derived conditions are converted into Linear Matrix Inequality (LMI) form. By solving the conditions, some feasible solutions can be obtained to establish the controller to guarantee robust stability of the delayed fin stabilizer stochastic system of a ship in the mean square