Evaluating strategies for implementing industry 4.0: a hybrid expert oriented approach of B.W.M. and interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy T.O.D.I.M.

open access articleDeveloping and accepting industry 4.0 influences the industry structure and customer willingness. To a successful transition to industry 4.0, implementation strategies should be selected with a systematic and comprehensive view to responding to the changes flexibly. This research aims to identify and prioritise the strategies for implementing industry 4.0. For this purpose, at first, evaluation attributes of strategies and also strategies to put industry 4.0 in practice are recognised. Then, the attributes are weighted to the experts’ opinion by using the Best Worst Method (BWM). Subsequently, the strategies for implementing industry 4.0 in Fara-Sanat Company, as a case study, have been ranked based on the Interval Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy (IVIF) of the TODIM method. The results indicated that the attributes of ‘Technology’, ‘Quality’, and ‘Operation’ have respectively the highest importance. Furthermore, the strategies for “new business models development’, ‘Improving information systems’ and ‘Human resource management’ received a higher rank. Eventually, some research and executive recommendations are provided. Having strategies for implementing industry 4.0 is a very important solution. Accordingly, multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods are a useful tool for adopting and selecting appropriate strategies. In this research, a novel and hybrid combination of BWM-TODIM is presented under IVIF information

Multicriteria optimization to select images as passwords in recognition based graphical authentication systems

Usability and guessability are two conflicting criteria in assessing the suitability of an image to be used as password in the recognition based graph -ical authentication systems (RGBSs). We present the first work in this area that uses a new approach, which effectively integrates a series of techniques in order to rank images taking into account the values obtained for each of the dimen -sions of usability and guessability, from two user studies. Our approach uses fuzzy numbers to deal with non commensurable criteria and compares two multicriteria optimization methods namely, TOPSIS and VIKOR. The results suggest that VIKOR method is the most applicable to make an objective state-ment about which image type is better suited to be used as password. The paper also discusses some improvements that could be done to improve the ranking assessment

A robust fuzzy possibilistic AHP approach for partner selection in international strategic alliance

The international strategic alliance is an inevitable solution for making competitive advantage and reducing the risk in today’s business environment. Partner selection is an important part in success of partnerships, and meanwhile it is a complicated decision because of various dimensions of the problem and inherent conflicts of stockholders. The purpose of this paper is to provide a practical approach to the problem of partner selection in international strategic alliances, which fulfills the gap between theories of inter-organizational relationships and quantitative models. Thus, a novel Robust Fuzzy Possibilistic AHP approach is proposed for combining the benefits of two complementary theories of inter-organizational relationships named, (1) Resource-based view, and (2) Transaction-cost theory and considering Fit theory as the perquisite of alliance success. The Robust Fuzzy Possibilistic AHP approach is a noveldevelopment of Interval-AHP technique employing robust formulation; aimed at handling the ambiguity of the problem and let the use of intervals as pairwise judgments. The proposed approach was compared with existing approaches, and the results show that it provides the best quality solutions in terms of minimum error degree. Moreover, the framework implemented in a case study and its applicability were discussed

A framework for the selection of the right nuclear power plant

Civil nuclear reactors are used for the production of electrical energy. In the nuclear industry vendors propose several nuclear reactor designs with a size from 35–45 MWe up to 1600–1700 MWe. The choice of the right design is a multidimensional problem since a utility has to include not only financial factors as levelised cost of electricity (LCOE) and internal rate of return (IRR), but also the so called “external factors” like the required spinning reserve, the impact on local industry and the social acceptability. Therefore it is necessary to balance advantages and disadvantages of each design during the entire life cycle of the plant, usually 40–60 years. In the scientific literature there are several techniques for solving this multidimensional problem. Unfortunately it does not seem possible to apply these methodologies as they are, since the problem is too complex and it is difficult to provide consistent and trustworthy expert judgments. This paper fills the gap, proposing a two-step framework to choosing the best nuclear reactor at the pre-feasibility study phase. The paper shows in detail how to use the methodology, comparing the choice of a small-medium reactor (SMR) with a large reactor (LR), characterised, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency (2006), by an electrical output respectively lower and higher than 700 MWe

Development, test and comparison of two Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis(MCDA) models: A case of healthcare infrastructure location

When planning a new development, location decisions have always been a major issue. This paper examines and compares two modelling methods used to inform a healthcare infrastructure location decision. Two Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) models were developed to support the optimisation of this decision-making process, within a National Health Service (NHS) organisation, in the UK. The proposed model structure is based on seven criteria (environment and safety, size, total cost, accessibility, design, risks and population profile) and 28 sub-criteria. First, Evidential Reasoning (ER) was used to solve the model, then, the processes and results were compared with the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). It was established that using ER or AHP led to the same solutions. However, the scores between the alternatives were significantly different; which impacted the stakeholders‟ decision-making. As the processes differ according to the model selected, ER or AHP, it is relevant to establish the practical and managerial implications for selecting one model or the other and providing evidence of which models best fit this specific environment. To achieve an optimum operational decision it is argued, in this study, that the most transparent and robust framework is achieved by merging ER process with the pair-wise comparison, an element of AHP. This paper makes a defined contribution by developing and examining the use of MCDA models, to rationalise new healthcare infrastructure location, with the proposed model to be used for future decision. Moreover, very few studies comparing different MCDA techniques were found, this study results enable practitioners to consider even further the modelling characteristics to ensure the development of a reliable framework, even if this means applying a hybrid approach

Identifying and Prioritizing the Effective Criteria in Selecting Lean Six Sigma Improvement Projects in the Healthcare Sector

[EN] The main objective of this study was to identify and prioritize effective criteria in selecting Lean Six Sigma improvement projects in the healthcare and treatment sector in Iran. The present study was an applied research in terms of objective and a descriptive and analytical one according to the research methodology and data collection approach. The research statistical population included experts and managers with experience in the field of implementing the lean six sigma methodology in the field of healthcare and treatment in Iran. We used interviews and questionnaire tools to collect the data. The effective criteria were identified through reviewing previous research, which were then prioritized based on the experts’ opinions using the BWM method. According to the results, out of the six main dimensions and 20 criteria identified, the customer development dimension with a weight of 0.387 and the customer satisfaction criterion with a weight of 0.066 were determined as the most effective dimension and the most effective criterion, respectively. Accordingly, the directors of medical centers and organizations affiliated with the healthcare sector are recommended to pay special attention to these defined criteria of the customer development dimension to effectively implement the lean six sigma methodology and managing an effective customer relationship.Bazrkar, A.; Aramoon, V.; Aramoon, E. (2021). Identifying and Prioritizing the Effective Criteria in Selecting Lean Six Sigma Improvement Projects in the Healthcare Sector. WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management. 12(2):41-55. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.15766OJS4155122Ahmed, S., Abd Manaf, N. H., & Islam, R. (2018). Effect of Lean Six Sigma on quality performance in Malaysian hospitals. International journal of health care quality assurance,13(8),973-987. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHCQA-07-2017-0138Antony, J., Rodgers, B., & Gijo, E. V. (2016). Can Lean Six Sigma make UK public sector organisations more efficient and effective?. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management,65(7),995-1002. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-03-2016-0069Aramoon, V., Aramoon, E., & Bazrkar, A. (2020). Investigating the Effect of Implementing the Lean Six Sigma on Organizational Performance Based on the Mediating Role of Strategic Knowledge Management with Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Navus-Revista de Gestão e Tecnologia, 10, 01-16. https://doi.org/10.22279/navus.2020.v10.p01-16.1302Assarlind, M., & Aaboen, L. (2014). Forces affecting one Lean Six Sigma adoption process. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma,5(3),324-340. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-07-2013-0039Bazrkar, A., & Iranzadeh, S. (2017). Prioritization of Lean Six Sigma improvement projects using data envelopment analysis cross efficiency model. Quality - Access to Success, 18(157), 72-76.Bhat, S., Antony, J., Gijo, E. V., & Cudney, E. A. (2019). Lean Six Sigma for the healthcare sector: a multiple case study analysis from the Indian context. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management.,37(1),90-111. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-07-2018-0193Bumjaid, S. E., & Malik, H. A. M. (2019). The Effect of Implementing of Six Sigma Approach in Improving the Quality of Higher Education Institutions in Bahrain. International Journal of Engineering and Management Research, 9,12-27. https://doi.org/10.31033/ijemr.9.2.17de Miranda Lammoglia, J. A., Brandalise, N., & Hernandez, C. T. (2020). Analytical hierarchy processbocr applied for the best lean project selection for production lines. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 11(1), 054-064. https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v11i1.990Erdil, N. O., Aktas, C. B., & Arani, O. M. (2018). Embedding sustainability in lean six sigma efforts. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 520-529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.048Gupta, H., & Barua, M. K. (2016). Identifying enablers of technological innovation for Indian MSMEs using best-worst multi criteria decision making method. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 107, 69-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.03.028Gupta, P., Anand, S., & Gupta, H. (2017). Developing a roadmap to overcome barriers to energy efficiency in buildings using best worst method. Sustainable Cities and Society, 31, 244-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.02.005Gupta, S., Modgil, S., & Gunasekaran, A. (2020). Big data in lean six sigma: a review and further research directions. International Journal of Production Research, 58(3), 947-969. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1598599Guo, S., & Zhao, H. (2017). Fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications. Knowledge-Based Systems, 121, 23-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2017.01.010Henrique, D. B., & Godinho Filho, M. (2020). A systematic literature review of empirical research in Lean and Six Sigma in healthcare. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 31(3-4), 429-449. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2018.1429259Improta, G., Cesarelli, M., Montuori, P., Santillo, L. C., & Triassi, M. (2018). Reducing the risk of healthcare‐associated infections through Lean Six Sigma: The case of the medicine areas at the Federico II University Hospital in Naples (Italy). Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 24(2), 338-346. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12844Kadarova, J., & Demecko, M. (2016). New approaches in lean management. Procedia Economics and Finance, 39(1), 11-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30234-9Laureani, A., & Antony, J. (2017). Leadership characteristics for lean six sigma. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 28(3-4), 405-426. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2015.1090291Li, J., Wang, J. Q., & Hu, J. H. (2019). Multi-criteria decision-making method based on dominance degree and BWM with probabilistic hesitant fuzzy information. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 10(7), 1671-1685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-018-0845-2Lizarelli, F. L., & Alliprandini, D. H. (2020). Comparative analysis of Lean and Six Sigma improvement projects: performance, changes, investment, time and complexity. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 31(3-4), 407-428. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2018.1428087Maghsoodi, A. I., Mosavat, M., Hafezalkotob, A., & Hafezalkotob, A. (2019). Hybrid hierarchical fuzzy group decision-making based on information axioms and BWM: Prototype design selection. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 127, 788-804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.11.018Malek, J., & Desai, T. N. (2019). Prioritization of sustainable manufacturing barriers using Best Worst Method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 226, 589-600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.056Marodin, G. A., Frank, A. G., Tortorella, G. L., & Saurin, T. A. (2016). Contextual factors and lean production implementation in the Brazilian automotive supply chain. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal,21(4),417-432. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-05-2015-0170Mason, S. E., Nicolay, C. R., & Darzi, A. (2015). The use of Lean and Six Sigma methodologies in surgery: A systematic review. The Surgeon, 13(2), 91-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2014.08.002McCann, L., Hassard, J. S., Granter, E., & Hyde, P. J. (2015). Casting the lean spell: The promotion, dilution and erosion of lean management in the NHS. Human Relations, 68(10), 1557-1577. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726714561697Mi, X., Tang, M., Liao, H., Shen, W., & Lev, B. (2019). The state-of-the-art survey on integrations and applications of the best worst method in decision making: Why, what, what for and what's next?. Omega, 87, 205-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2019.01.009Morell-Santandreu, O., Santandreu-Mascarell, C., & Garcia-Sabater, J. J. (2021). A Model for the Implementation of Lean Improvements in Healthcare Environments as Applied in a Primary Care Center. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(6), 2876. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18062876Morell-Santandreu,O., Santandreu-Mascarell, C., & García-Sabater, J. (2020). Sustainability and Kaizen: Business Model Trends in Healthcare. Sustainability, 12(24), 10622. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410622Mrugalska, B., & Wyrwicka, M. K. (2017). Towards lean production in industry 4.0. Procedia Engineering, 182, 466-473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.135Naumovich, A. (2020). The Japanese concept of lean production: possibility of implementation in the Belarusian economy,http://edoc.bseu.by/.Okpala, C. C., Obiuto, N. C., & Elijah, O. C. (2020). Lean Production System Implementation in an Original Equipment Manufacturing Company: Benefits, Challenges, and Critical Success Factors. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology,9(7),1665-1672.Pakdil, F., Toktaş, P. and Can, G.F. (2020), Six sigma project prioritization and selection: a multi-criteria decision making approach in healthcare industry,International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, Vol. ahead-ofprint No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-04-2020-0054Pamučar, D., Petrović, I., & Ćirović, G. (2018). "Modification of the Best-Worst and MABAC methods: A novel approach based on interval- valued fuzzy-rough numbers. Expert Systems with Applications, 91, 89-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.08.042Rahul, G., Samanta, A. K., & Varaprasad, G. (2020, July). A Lean Six Sigma approach to reduce overcrowding of patients and improving the discharge process in a super-specialty hospital. In 2020 International Conference on System, Computation, Automation and Networking (ICSCAN) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53, 49-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009Rezaei, J., van Roekel, W. S., & Tavasszy, L. (2018). Measuring the relative importance of the logistics performance index indicators using Best Worst Method. Transport Policy, 68, 158-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.05.007Sá, J. C., Vaz, S., Carvalho, O., Lima, V., Morgado, L., Fonseca, L., ... & Santos, G. (2020). A model of integration ISO 9001 with Lean six sigma and main benefits achieved. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2020.1829969Shenshinov, Y., & Abdulsattar Al-Ali. (2020). THE TOOLS OF INCREASING EFFICIENCY OF HUMAN RESOURCE IN THE LEAN PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENT: CONCEPTUAL STUDY. International Journal of Core Engineering & Managenet,6(7),1-18.Singh,M.,Rathi,R.,Antony,J.,Garza-Reyes,J.A.(2021).L Lean Six Sigma Project Selection in a Manufacturing Environment Using Hybrid Methodology Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy MADM Approach, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, doi: 10.1109/TEM.2021.3049877. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3049877Sunder, M. V. (2013). Synergies of lean six sigma. IUP Journal of Operations Management, 12(1), 21.Sunder., M, V., & Kunnath, N. R. (2020). Six Sigma to reduce claims processing errors in a healthcare payer firm. Production Planning & Control, 31(6), 496-511. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1652857Swarnakar, V., & Vinodh, S. (2014). Lean Six Sigma Project Selection using Analytical Network Process. Proceedings of SOM, Conference: XVIII Annual International Conference of the Society of Operations Management,2014.Trakulsunti, Y., & Antony, J. (2018). Can Lean Six Sigma be used to reduce medication errors in the healthcare sector?. Leadership in Health Services, 31(4),426-433. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHS-09-2017-0055Trakulsunti, Y., Antony, J., Ghadge, A., & Gupta, S. (2020). Reducing medication errors using LSS Methodology: A systematic literature review and key findings. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 31(5-6), 550-568. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2018.1434771Vinodh, S., & Swarnakar, V. (2015). Lean Six Sigma project selection using hybrid approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL-ANP-TOPSIS. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma,6(4),313-338. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-12-2014-0041Wang, F. K., & Chen, K. S. (2010). Applying Lean Six Sigma and TRIZ methodology in banking services. Total Quality Management, 21(3), 301-315. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783360903553248Yadav, G., & Desai, T. N. (2017a). A fuzzy AHP approach to prioritize the barriers of integrated Lean Six Sigma. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management,34(8),1167-1185. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-01-2016-0010Yadav, G., & Desai, T. N. (2017b). Analyzing lean six sigma enablers: a hybrid ISM-fuzzy MICMAC approach. The TQM Journal,29(3).488-511. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-04-2016-004