2,657 research outputs found

    Research in the general area of non-linear dynamical systems Final report, 8 Jun. 1965 - 8 Jun. 1967

    Get PDF
    Nonlinear dynamical systems research on systems stability, invariance principles, Liapunov functions, and Volterra and functional integral equation

    Invariant Measures for Dissipative Dynamical Systems: Abstract Results and Applications

    Full text link
    In this work we study certain invariant measures that can be associated to the time averaged observation of a broad class of dissipative semigroups via the notion of a generalized Banach limit. Consider an arbitrary complete separable metric space XX which is acted on by any continuous semigroup {S(t)}t≥0\{S(t)\}_{t \geq 0}. Suppose that §(t)}t≥0\S(t)\}_{t \geq 0} possesses a global attractor A\mathcal{A}. We show that, for any generalized Banach limit LIMT→∞\underset{T \rightarrow \infty}{\rm{LIM}} and any distribution of initial conditions m0\mathfrak{m}_0, that there exists an invariant probability measure m\mathfrak{m}, whose support is contained in A\mathcal{A}, such that ∫Xϕ(x)dm(x)=LIMT→∞1T∫0T∫Xϕ(S(t)x)dm0(x)dt, \int_{X} \phi(x) d\mathfrak{m} (x) = \underset{T\to \infty}{\rm{LIM}} \frac{1}{T}\int_0^T \int_X \phi(S(t) x) d \mathfrak{m}_0(x) d t, for all observables ϕ\phi living in a suitable function space of continuous mappings on XX. This work is based on a functional analytic framework simplifying and generalizing previous works in this direction. In particular our results rely on the novel use of a general but elementary topological observation, valid in any metric space, which concerns the growth of continuous functions in the neighborhood of compact sets. In the case when {S(t)}t≥0\{S(t)\}_{t \geq 0} does not possess a compact absorbing set, this lemma allows us to sidestep the use of weak compactness arguments which require the imposition of cumbersome weak continuity conditions and limits the phase space XX to the case of a reflexive Banach space. Two examples of concrete dynamical systems where the semigroup is known to be non-compact are examined in detail.Comment: To appear in Communications in Mathematical Physic

    On the stationarity of linearly forced turbulence in finite domains

    Full text link
    A simple scheme of forcing turbulence away from decay was introduced by Lundgren some time ago, the `linear forcing', which amounts to a force term linear in the velocity field with a constant coefficient. The evolution of linearly forced turbulence towards a stationary final state, as indicated by direct numerical simulations (DNS), is examined from a theoretical point of view based on symmetry arguments. In order to follow closely the DNS the flow is assumed to live in a cubic domain with periodic boundary conditions. The simplicity of the linear forcing scheme allows one to re-write the problem as one of decaying turbulence with a decreasing viscosity. Scaling symmetry considerations suggest that the system evolves to a stationary state, evolution that may be understood as the gradual breaking of a larger approximate symmetry to a smaller exact symmetry. The same arguments show that the finiteness of the domain is intimately related to the evolution of the system to a stationary state at late times, as well as the consistency of this state with a high degree of isotropy imposed by the symmetries of the domain itself. The fluctuations observed in the DNS for all quantities in the stationary state can be associated with deviations from isotropy. Indeed, self-preserving isotropic turbulence models are used to study evolution from a direct dynamical point of view, emphasizing the naturalness of the Taylor microscale as a self-similarity scale in this system. In this context the stationary state emerges as a stable fixed point. Self-preservation seems to be the reason behind a noted similarity of the third order structure function between the linearly forced and freely decaying turbulence, where again the finiteness of the domain plays an significant role.Comment: 15 pages, 7 figures, changes in the discussion at the end of section VI, formula (60) correcte
    • …
    corecore