3,718 research outputs found

    Super edge-magic deficiency of join-product graphs

    Full text link
    A graph GG is called \textit{super edge-magic} if there exists a bijective function ff from V(G)āˆŖE(G)V(G) \cup E(G) to {1,2,ā€¦,āˆ£V(G)āˆŖE(G)āˆ£}\{1, 2, \ldots, |V(G) \cup E(G)|\} such that f(V(G))={1,2,ā€¦,āˆ£V(G)āˆ£}f(V(G)) = \{1, 2, \ldots, |V(G)|\} and f(x)+f(xy)+f(y)f(x) + f(xy) + f(y) is a constant kk for every edge xyxy of GG. Furthermore, the \textit{super edge-magic deficiency} of a graph GG is either the minimum nonnegative integer nn such that GāˆŖnK1G \cup nK_1 is super edge-magic or +āˆž+\infty if there exists no such integer. \emph{Join product} of two graphs is their graph union with additional edges that connect all vertices of the first graph to each vertex of the second graph. In this paper, we study the super edge-magic deficiencies of a wheel minus an edge and join products of a path, a star, and a cycle, respectively, with isolated vertices.Comment: 11 page

    Super Edge-magic Labeling of Graphs: Deficiency and Maximality

    Full text link
    A graph G of order p and size q is called super edge-magic if there exists a bijective function f from V(G) U E(G) to {1, 2, 3, ..., p+q} such that f(x) + f(xy) + f(y) is a constant for every edge xyāˆˆE(G)xy \in E(G) and f(V(G)) = {1, 2, 3, ..., p}. The super edge-magic deficiency of a graph G is either the smallest nonnegative integer n such that G U nK_1 is super edge-magic or +~ if there exists no such integer n. In this paper, we study the super edge-magic deficiency of join product graphs. We found a lower bound of the super edge-magic deficiency of join product of any connected graph with isolated vertices and a better upper bound of the super edge-magic deficiency of join product of super edge-magic graphs with isolated vertices. Also, we provide constructions of some maximal graphs, ie. super edge-magic graphs with maximal number of edges

    Some results concerning the valences of (super) edge-magic graphs

    Full text link
    A graph GG is called edge-magic if there exists a bijective function f:V(G)āˆŖE(G)ā†’{1,2,ā€¦,āˆ£V(G)āˆ£+āˆ£E(G)āˆ£}f:V\left(G\right) \cup E\left(G\right)\rightarrow \left\{1, 2, \ldots , \left\vert V\left( G\right) \right\vert +\left\vert E\left( G\right) \right\vert \right\} such that f(u)+f(v)+f(uv)f\left(u\right) + f\left(v\right) + f\left(uv\right) is a constant (called the valence of ff) for each uvāˆˆE(G)uv\in E\left( G\right) . If f(V(G))={1,2,ā€¦,āˆ£V(G)āˆ£}f\left(V \left(G\right)\right) =\left\{1, 2, \ldots , \left\vert V\left( G\right) \right\vert \right\}, then GG is called a super edge-magic graph. A stronger version of edge-magic and super edge-magic graphs appeared when the concepts of perfect edge-magic and perfect super edge-magic graphs were introduced. The super edge-magic deficiency Ī¼s(G) \mu_{s}\left(G\right) of a graph GG is defined to be either the smallest nonnegative integer nn with the property that GāˆŖnK1G \cup nK_{1} is super edge-magic or +āˆž+ \infty if there exists no such integer nn. On the other hand, the edge-magic deficiency Ī¼(G) \mu\left(G\right) of a graph GG is the smallest nonnegative integer nn for which GāˆŖnK1G\cup nK_{1} is edge-magic, being Ī¼(G) \mu\left(G\right) always finite. In this paper, the concepts of (super) edge-magic deficiency are generalized using the concepts of perfect (super) edge-magic graphs. This naturally leads to the study of the valences of edge-magic and super edge-magic labelings. We present some general results in this direction and study the perfect (super) edge-magic deficiency of the star K1,nK_{1,n}

    Recent studies on the super edge-magic deficiency of graphs

    Full text link
    A graph GG is called edge-magic if there exists a bijective function f:V(G)āˆŖE(G)ā†’{1,2,ā€¦,āˆ£V(G)āˆ£+āˆ£E(G)āˆ£}f:V\left(G\right) \cup E\left(G\right)\rightarrow \left\{1, 2, \ldots , \left\vert V\left( G\right) \right\vert +\left\vert E\left( G\right) \right\vert \right\} such that f(u)+f(v)+f(uv)f\left(u\right) + f\left(v\right) + f\left(uv\right) is a constant for each uvāˆˆE(G)uv\in E\left( G\right) . Also, GG is said to be super edge-magic if f(V(G))={1,2,ā€¦,āˆ£V(G)āˆ£}f\left(V \left(G\right)\right) =\left\{1, 2, \ldots , \left\vert V\left( G\right) \right\vert \right\}. Furthermore, the super edge-magic deficiency Ī¼s(G) \mu_{s}\left(G\right) of a graph GG is defined to be either the smallest nonnegative integer nn with the property that GāˆŖnK1G \cup nK_{1} is super edge-magic or +āˆž+ \infty if there exists no such integer nn. In this paper, we introduce the parameter l(n)l\left(n\right) as the minimum size of a graph GG of order nn for which all graphs of order nn and size at least l(n)l\left(n\right) have Ī¼s(G)=+āˆž\mu_{s} \left( G \right)=+\infty , and provide lower and upper bounds for l(G)l\left(G\right). Imran, Baig, and Fe\u{n}ov\u{c}\'{i}kov\'{a} established that for integers nn with nā‰”0(mod4)n\equiv 0\pmod{4}, Ī¼s(Dn)ā‰¤3n/2āˆ’1 \mu_{s}\left(D_{n}\right) \leq 3n/2-1, where DnD_{n} is the cartesian product of the cycle CnC_{n} of order nn and the complete graph K2K_{2} of order 22. We improve this bound by showing that Ī¼s(Dn)ā‰¤n+1 \mu_{s}\left(D_{n}\right) \leq n+1 when nā‰„4n \geq 4 is even. Enomoto, Llad\'{o}, Nakamigawa, and Ringel posed the conjecture that every nontrivial tree is super edge-magic. We propose a new approach to attak this conjecture. This approach may also help to resolve another labeling conjecture on trees by Graham and Sloane

    New Results on the (Super) Edge-Magic Deficiency of Chain Graphs

    Get PDF
    Let G be a graph of order v and size e. An edge-magic labeling of G is a bijection f:V(G)āˆŖE(G)ā†’{1,2,3,ā€¦,v+e} such that f(x)+f(xy)+f(y) is a constant for every edge xyāˆˆE(G). An edge-magic labeling f of G with f(V(G))={1,2,3,ā€¦,v} is called a super edge-magic labeling. Furthermore, the edge-magic deficiency of a graph G, Ī¼(G), is defined as the smallest nonnegative integer n such that GāˆŖnK1 has an edge-magic labeling. Similarly, the super edge-magic deficiency of a graph G, Ī¼s(G), is either the smallest nonnegative integer n such that GāˆŖnK1 has a super edge-magic labeling or +āˆž if there exists no such integer n. In this paper, we investigate the (super) edge-magic deficiency of chain graphs. Referring to these, we propose some open problems

    Magic and antimagic labeling of graphs

    Get PDF
    "A bijection mapping that assigns natural numbers to vertices and/or edges of a graph is called a labeling. In this thesis, we consider graph labelings that have weights associated with each edge and/or vertex. If all the vertex weights (respectively, edge weights) have the same value then the labeling is called magic. If the weight is different for every vertex (respectively, every edge) then we called the labeling antimagic. In this thesis we introduce some variations of magic and antimagic labelings and discuss their properties and provide corresponding labeling schemes. There are two main parts in this thesis. One main part is on vertex labeling and the other main part is on edge labeling."Doctor of Philosoph

    Four Lessons in Versatility or How Query Languages Adapt to the Web

    Get PDF
    Exposing not only human-centered information, but machine-processable data on the Web is one of the commonalities of recent Web trends. It has enabled a new kind of applications and businesses where the data is used in ways not foreseen by the data providers. Yet this exposition has fractured the Web into islands of data, each in different Web formats: Some providers choose XML, others RDF, again others JSON or OWL, for their data, even in similar domains. This fracturing stifles innovation as application builders have to cope not only with one Web stack (e.g., XML technology) but with several ones, each of considerable complexity. With Xcerpt we have developed a rule- and pattern based query language that aims to give shield application builders from much of this complexity: In a single query language XML and RDF data can be accessed, processed, combined, and re-published. Though the need for combined access to XML and RDF data has been recognized in previous work (including the W3Cā€™s GRDDL), our approach differs in four main aspects: (1) We provide a single language (rather than two separate or embedded languages), thus minimizing the conceptual overhead of dealing with disparate data formats. (2) Both the declarative (logic-based) and the operational semantics are unified in that they apply for querying XML and RDF in the same way. (3) We show that the resulting query language can be implemented reusing traditional database technology, if desirable. Nevertheless, we also give a unified evaluation approach based on interval labelings of graphs that is at least as fast as existing approaches for tree-shaped XML data, yet provides linear time and space querying also for many RDF graphs. We believe that Web query languages are the right tool for declarative data access in Web applications and that Xcerpt is a significant step towards a more convenient, yet highly efficient data access in a ā€œWeb of Dataā€

    Undergraduate Review, Vol. 16, Issue 1, 2021

    Get PDF
    • ā€¦
    corecore