8,776 research outputs found
On the Expressiveness of LARA: A Unified Language for Linear and Relational Algebra
We study the expressive power of the Lara language - a recently proposed unified model for expressing relational and linear algebra operations - both in terms of traditional database query languages and some analytic tasks often performed in machine learning pipelines. We start by showing Lara to be expressive complete with respect to first-order logic with aggregation. Since Lara is parameterized by a set of user-defined functions which allow to transform values in tables, the exact expressive power of the language depends on how these functions are defined. We distinguish two main cases depending on the level of genericity queries are enforced to satisfy. Under strong genericity assumptions the language cannot express matrix convolution, a very important operation in current machine learning operations. This language is also local, and thus cannot express operations such as matrix inverse that exhibit a recursive behavior. For expressing convolution, one can relax the genericity requirement by adding an underlying linear order on the domain. This, however, destroys locality and turns the expressive power of the language much more difficult to understand. In particular, although under complexity assumptions the resulting language can still not express matrix inverse, a proof of this fact without such assumptions seems challenging to obtain
Logic Meets Algebra: the Case of Regular Languages
The study of finite automata and regular languages is a privileged meeting
point of algebra and logic. Since the work of Buchi, regular languages have
been classified according to their descriptive complexity, i.e. the type of
logical formalism required to define them. The algebraic point of view on
automata is an essential complement of this classification: by providing
alternative, algebraic characterizations for the classes, it often yields the
only opportunity for the design of algorithms that decide expressibility in
some logical fragment.
We survey the existing results relating the expressibility of regular
languages in logical fragments of MSO[S] with algebraic properties of their
minimal automata. In particular, we show that many of the best known results in
this area share the same underlying mechanics and rely on a very strong
relation between logical substitutions and block-products of pseudovarieties of
monoid. We also explain the impact of these connections on circuit complexity
theory.Comment: 37 page
Regular Combinators for String Transformations
We focus on (partial) functions that map input strings to a monoid such as
the set of integers with addition and the set of output strings with
concatenation. The notion of regularity for such functions has been defined
using two-way finite-state transducers, (one-way) cost register automata, and
MSO-definable graph transformations. In this paper, we give an algebraic and
machine-independent characterization of this class analogous to the definition
of regular languages by regular expressions. When the monoid is commutative, we
prove that every regular function can be constructed from constant functions
using the combinators of choice, split sum, and iterated sum, that are analogs
of union, concatenation, and Kleene-*, respectively, but enforce unique (or
unambiguous) parsing. Our main result is for the general case of
non-commutative monoids, which is of particular interest for capturing regular
string-to-string transformations for document processing. We prove that the
following additional combinators suffice for constructing all regular
functions: (1) the left-additive versions of split sum and iterated sum, which
allow transformations such as string reversal; (2) sum of functions, which
allows transformations such as copying of strings; and (3) function
composition, or alternatively, a new concept of chained sum, which allows
output values from adjacent blocks to mix.Comment: This is the full version, with omitted proofs and constructions, of
the conference paper currently in submissio
A Formalization of Polytime Functions
We present a deep embedding of Bellantoni and Cook's syntactic
characterization of polytime functions. We prove formally that it is correct
and complete with respect to the original characterization by Cobham that
required a bound to be proved manually. Compared to the paper proof by
Bellantoni and Cook, we have been careful in making our proof fully contructive
so that we obtain more precise bounding polynomials and more efficient
translations between the two characterizations. Another difference is that we
consider functions on bitstrings instead of functions on positive integers.
This latter change is motivated by the application of our formalization in the
context of formal security proofs in cryptography. Based on our core
formalization, we have started developing a library of polytime functions that
can be reused to build more complex ones.Comment: 13 page
Euler-Bessel and Euler-Fourier Transforms
We consider a topological integral transform of Bessel (concentric
isospectral sets) type and Fourier (hyperplane isospectral sets) type, using
the Euler characteristic as a measure. These transforms convert constructible
\zed-valued functions to continuous -valued functions over a vector
space. Core contributions include: the definition of the topological Bessel
transform; a relationship in terms of the logarithmic blowup of the topological
Fourier transform; and a novel Morse index formula for the transforms. We then
apply the theory to problems of target reconstruction from enumerative sensor
data, including localization and shape discrimination. This last application
utilizes an extension of spatially variant apodization (SVA) to mitigate
sidelobe phenomena
Logic in the Tractatus
I present a reconstruction of the logical system of the Tractatus, which differs from classical logic in two ways. It includes an account of Wittgenstein’s “form-series” device, which suffices to express some effectively generated countably infinite disjunctions. And its attendant notion of structure is relativized to the fixed underlying universe of what is named.
There follow three results. First, the class of concepts definable in the system is closed under finitary induction. Second, if the universe of objects is countably infinite, then the property of being a tautology is \Pi^1_1-complete. But third, it is only granted the assumption of countability that the class of tautologies is \Sigma_1-definable in set theory.
Wittgenstein famously urges that logical relationships must show themselves in the structure of signs. He also urges that the size of the universe cannot be prejudged. The results of this paper indicate that there is no single way in which logical relationships could be held to make themselves manifest in signs, which does not prejudge the number of objects
- …