4,964 research outputs found

    Spiking Dynamics during Perceptual Grouping in the Laminar Circuits of Visual Cortex

    Full text link
    Grouping of collinear boundary contours is a fundamental process during visual perception. Illusory contour completion vividly illustrates how stable perceptual boundaries interpolate between pairs of contour inducers, but do not extrapolate from a single inducer. Neural models have simulated how perceptual grouping occurs in laminar visual cortical circuits. These models predicted the existence of grouping cells that obey a bipole property whereby grouping can occur inwardly between pairs or greater numbers of similarly oriented and co-axial inducers, but not outwardly from individual inducers. These models have not, however, incorporated spiking dynamics. Perceptual grouping is a challenge for spiking cells because its properties of collinear facilitation and analog sensitivity to inducer configurations occur despite irregularities in spike timing across all the interacting cells. Other models have demonstrated spiking dynamics in laminar neocortical circuits, but not how perceptual grouping occurs. The current model begins to unify these two modeling streams by implementing a laminar cortical network of spiking cells whose intracellular temporal dynamics interact with recurrent intercellular spiking interactions to quantitatively simulate data from neurophysiological experiments about perceptual grouping, the structure of non-classical visual receptive fields, and gamma oscillations.CELEST, an NSF Science of Learning Center (SBE-0354378); SyNAPSE program of the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency (HR001109-03-0001); Defense Advanced Research Project Agency (HR001-09-C-0011

    The emotional gatekeeper: a computational model of attentional selection and suppression through the pathway from the amygdala to the inhibitory thalamic reticular nucleus

    Get PDF
    In a complex environment that contains both opportunities and threats, it is important for an organism to flexibly direct attention based on current events and prior plans. The amygdala, the hub of the brain's emotional system, is involved in forming and signaling affective associations between stimuli and their consequences. The inhibitory thalamic reticular nucleus (TRN) is a hub of the attentional system that gates thalamo-cortical signaling. In the primate brain, a recently discovered pathway from the amygdala sends robust projections to TRN. Here we used computational modeling to demonstrate how the amygdala-TRN pathway, embedded in a wider neural circuit, can mediate selective attention guided by emotions. Our Emotional Gatekeeper model demonstrates how this circuit enables focused top-down, and flexible bottom-up, allocation of attention. The model suggests that the amygdala-TRN projection can serve as a unique mechanism for emotion-guided selection of signals sent to cortex for further processing. This inhibitory selection mechanism can mediate a powerful affective 'framing' effect that may lead to biased decision-making in highly charged emotional situations. The model also supports the idea that the amygdala can serve as a relevance detection system. Further, the model demonstrates how abnormal top-down drive and dysregulated local inhibition in the amygdala and in the cortex can contribute to the attentional symptoms that accompany several neuropsychiatric disorders.R01MH057414 - NIMH NIH HHS; R01 MH057414 - NIMH NIH HHS; R01 MH101209 - NIMH NIH HHS; R01NS024760 - NINDS NIH HHS; R01MH101209 - NIMH NIH HHS; R01 NS024760 - NINDS NIH HH

    Cortical patterns and gamma genesis are modulated by reversal potentials and gap-junction diffusion

    Get PDF
    In this chapter we describe a continuum model for the cortex that includes both axon-to-dendrite chemical synapses and direct neuron-to-neuron gap-junction diffusive synapses. The effectiveness of chemical synapses is determined by the voltage of the receiving dendrite V relative to its Nernst reversal potential Vrev. Here we explore two alternative strategies for incorporating dendritic reversal potentials, and uncover surprising differences in their stability properties and model dynamics. In the “slow-soma” variant, the (Vrev - V) weighting is applied after the input flux has been integrated at the dendrite, while for “fast-soma”, the weighting is applied directly to the input flux, prior to dendritic integration. For the slow-soma case, we find that–-provided the inhibitory diffusion (via gap-junctions) is sufficiently strong–-the cortex generates stationary Turing patterns of cortical activity. In contrast, the fast-soma destabilizes in favor of standing-wave spatial structures that oscillate at low-gamma frequency ( 30-Hz); these spatial patterns broaden and weaken as diffusive coupling increases, and disappear altogether at moderate levels of diffusion. We speculate that the slow- and fast-soma models might correspond respectively to the idling and active modes of the cortex, with slow-soma patterns providing the default background state, and emergence of gamma oscillations in the fast-soma case signaling the transition into the cognitive state

    Prediction and memory: A predictive coding account

    Get PDF
    The hippocampus is crucial for episodic memory, but it is also involved in online prediction. Evidence suggests that a unitary hippocampal code underlies both episodic memory and predictive processing, yet within a predictive coding framework the hippocampal-neocortical interactions that accompany these two phenomena are distinct and opposing. Namely, during episodic recall, the hippocampus is thought to exert an excitatory influence on the neocortex, to reinstate activity patterns across cortical circuits. This contrasts with empirical and theoretical work on predictive processing, where descending predictions suppress prediction errors to ‘explain away’ ascending inputs via cortical inhibition. In this hypothesis piece, we attempt to dissolve this previously overlooked dialectic. We consider how the hippocampus may facilitate both prediction and memory, respectively, by inhibiting neocortical prediction errors or increasing their gain. We propose that these distinct processing modes depend upon the neuromodulatory gain (or precision) ascribed to prediction error units. Within this framework, memory recall is cast as arising from fictive prediction errors that furnish training signals to optimise generative models of the world, in the absence of sensory data
    corecore