An overview of the ciao multiparadigm language and program development environment and its design philosophy

We describe some of the novel aspects and motivations behind the design and implementation of the Ciao multiparadigm programming system. An important aspect of Ciao is that it provides the programmer with a large number of useful features from different programming paradigms and styles, and that the use of each of these features can be turned on and off at will for each program module. Thus, a given module may be using e.g. higher order functions and constraints, while another module may be using objects, predicates, and concurrency. Furthermore, the language is designed to be extensible in a simple and modular way. Another important aspect of Ciao is its programming environment, which provides a powerful preprocessor (with an associated assertion language) capable of statically finding non-trivial bugs, verifying that programs comply with specifications, and performing many types of program optimizations. Such optimizations produce code that is highly competitive with other dynamic languages or, when the highest levéis of optimization are used, even that of static languages, all while retaining the interactive development environment of a dynamic language. The environment also includes a powerful auto-documenter. The paper provides an informal overview of the language and program development environment. It aims at illustrating the design philosophy rather than at being exhaustive, which would be impossible in the format of a paper, pointing instead to the existing literature on the system

A Practical Type Analysis for Verification of Modular Prolog Programs

Regular types are a powerful tool for computing very precise descriptive types for logic programs. However, in the context of real life, modular Prolog programs, the accurate results obtained by regular types often come at the price of efficiency. In this paper we propose a combination of techniques aimed at improving analysis efficiency in this context. As a first technique we allow optionally reducing the accuracy of inferred types by using only the types defined by the user or present in the libraries. We claim that, for the purpose of verifying type signatures given in the form of assertions the precision obtained using this approach is sufficient, and show that analysis times can be reduced significantly. Our second technique is aimed at dealing with situations where we would like to limit the amount of reanalysis performed, especially for library modules. Borrowing some ideas from polymorphic type systems, we show how to solve the problem by admitting parameters in type specifications. This allows us to compose new call patterns with some pre computed analysis info without losing any information. We argue that together these two techniques contribute to the practical and scalable analysis and verification of types in Prolog programs

High-level languages for small devices: A case study

In this paper we study, through a concrete case, the feasibility of using a high-level, general-purpose logic language in the design and implementation of applications targeting wearable computers. The case study is a "sound spatializer" which, given real-time signáis for monaural audio and heading, generates stereo sound which appears to come from a position in space. The use of advanced compile-time transformations and optimizations made it possible to execute code written in a clear style without efñciency or architectural concerns on the target device, while meeting strict existing time and memory constraints. The final executable compares favorably with a similar implementation written in C. We believe that this case is representative of a wider class of common pervasive computing applications, and that the techniques we show here can be put to good use in a range of scenarios. This points to the possibility of applying high-level languages, with their associated flexibility, conciseness, ability to be automatically parallelized, sophisticated compile-time tools for analysis and verification, etc., to the embedded systems field without paying an unnecessary performance penalty

Description and Optimization of Abstract Machines in a Dialect of Prolog

In order to achieve competitive performance, abstract machines for Prolog and related languages end up being large and intricate, and incorporate sophisticated optimizations, both at the design and at the implementation levels. At the same time, efficiency considerations make it necessary to use low-level languages in their implementation. This makes them laborious to code, optimize, and, especially, maintain and extend. Writing the abstract machine (and ancillary code) in a higher-level language can help tame this inherent complexity. We show how the semantics of most basic components of an efficient virtual machine for Prolog can be described using (a variant of) Prolog. These descriptions are then compiled to C and assembled to build a complete bytecode emulator. Thanks to the high level of the language used and its closeness to Prolog, the abstract machine description can be manipulated using standard Prolog compilation and optimization techniques with relative ease. We also show how, by applying program transformations selectively, we obtain abstract machine implementations whose performance can match and even exceed that of state-of-the-art, highly-tuned, hand-crafted emulators.Comment: 56 pages, 46 figures, 5 tables, To appear in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP

Programming Language Techniques for Natural Language Applications

It is easy to imagine machines that can communicate in natural language. Constructing such machines is more difficult. The aim of this thesis is to demonstrate how declarative grammar formalisms that distinguish between abstract and concrete syntax make it easier to develop natural language applications. We describe how the type-theorectical grammar formalism Grammatical Framework (GF) can be used as a high-level language for natural language applications. By taking advantage of techniques from the field of programming language implementation, we can use GF grammars to perform portable and efficient parsing and linearization, generate speech recognition language models, implement multimodal fusion and fission, generate support code for abstract syntax transformations, generate dialogue managers, and implement speech translators and web-based syntax-aware editors. By generating application components from a declarative grammar, we can reduce duplicated work, ensure consistency, make it easier to build multilingual systems, improve linguistic quality, enable re-use across system domains, and make systems more portable

Abstraction for web programming

This thesis considers several instances of abstraction that arose in the design and implementation of the web programming language Links. The first concerns user interfaces, specified using HTML forms. We wish to construct forms from existing form fragments without introducing dependencies on the implementation details of those fragments. Surprisingly, many existing web systems do not support this simple scenario. We present a library which captures the essence of form abstraction, and extend it with more practical facilities, such as validation of the HTML a program produces and of the input a user submits. An important part of our library is a simple semantics, given as the composition of three primitive “idioms”, an interface to computation introduced by McBride and Paterson. In order to justify this approach we present a comparison of idioms with the related notions of monads and arrows, refining the informal claims in the literature. Our library forms part of the Links framework for stateless web interactions. We describe a related aspect of this system, a preprocessor that derives generic instances of functions, which we use to serialise server state between client requests. The abstraction in this case involves the shape of datatypes: the serialisation operation is specified independently of the particular types involved. Our final instance of abstraction involves abstract types. Functional programming languages typically offer one of two styles of abstract type: the abstraction boundary may be drawn using a private data constructor, or using a type signature. We show that there is a pair of semantics-preserving translations between these two styles. In the light of this, we revisit the decision of the Haskell designers to offer the constructor style, and define a library that supports signature-style definitions in Haskell by translation into the constructor style

Polarized substructural session types

Concurrent processes can be extremely difficult to reason about, both for programmers and formally. One approach to coping with this difficulty is to study new programming languages and type features such as Session Types. Session types take as their conceptual notion of concurrency as a collection of processes linked together via channels and provide type-level coordination between processes using these channels. Logically motivated programming languages exploit the idea that providing a proof of a theorem in a logic is similar to proving that a given term has a particular type in a programming language and vice versa. These connections can be interesting for a few different reasons. First, when language and logic are independently discovered and independently useful, the existence of a connection suggests that both are onto some fundamentally important idea. Additionally, a connection provides a basis both for sanity checking our ideas and also can be fruitful grounds for inspiration by seeing how variants of either the logic or the language are reflected through the connection. This thesis primarily describes an exploration of logically motivated session types, SILL. Polarization, classifying propositions as either positive or negative, provides a natural way to describe a logically based session typing language with asynchronous communication while retaining a semantics that is reasonably implementable. Additionally, polarization gives us a way to smoothly integrate synchronous channels into SILL without needing a semantic extension. When combined with Adjoint Logic, this gives us an ability to incorporate a variety of modalities with relatively little work. From a practical perspective, this gives SILL access to persistent processes and garbage collection. We additionally explore a trio of loosely related extensions to SILL, and their logical connections, inspired by the above results: bundled message passing to reduce the number of communications performed by processes; racy programs, enabled by a select/epoll-like mechanism; and asynchronous receiving, an almost generalization of the basic asynchronous semantics. We have three different implementations of SILL: a simple but relatively full featured interpreter written in OCaml; a fragment of SILL as an embedded domain specific language in Haskell; and a cleaner version of the same in Idris. Lastly, we show that Liquid Types and Session Types are compatible. This gives us one notion of a dependently session typed language

Zertifizierende verteilte Algorithmen

Eine Herausforderung der Softwareentwicklung ist, die Korrektheit einer Software sicherzustellen. Testen bietet es keine mathematische Korrektheit. Formale Verifikation ist jedoch oft zu aufwändig. Laufzeitverifikation steht zwischen den beiden Methoden. Laufzeitverifikation beantwortet die Frage, ob ein Eingabe-Ausgabe-Paar korrekt ist. Ein zertifizierender Algorithmus überzeugt seinen Nutzer durch ein Korrektheitsargument zur Laufzeit. Dafür berechnet ein zertifizierender Algorithmus für eine Eingabe zusätzlich zur Ausgabe noch einen Zeugen – ein Korrektheitsargument. Jeder zertifizierende Algorithmus besitzt ein Zeugenprädikat: Ist dieses erfüllt für eine Eingabe, eine Ausgabe und einen Zeugen, so ist das Eingabe-Ausgabe-Paar korrekt. Ein simpler Algorithmus, der das Zeugenprädikat für den Nutzer entscheidet, ist ein Checker. Die Korrektheit des Checkers ist folglich notwendig für den Ansatz und die formale Instanzverifikation, bei der wir Checker verifizieren und einen maschinen-geprüften Beweis für die Korrektheit eines Eingabe-Ausgabe-Paars zur Laufzeit gewinnen. Zertifizierende sequentielle Algorithmen sind gut untersucht. Verteilte Algorithmen, die auf verteilten Systemen laufen, unterscheiden sich grundlegend von sequentiellen Algorithmen: die Ausgabe ist über das System verteilt oder der Algorithmus läuft fortwährend. Wir untersuchen zertifizierende verteilte Algorithmen. Unsere Forschungsfrage ist: Wie können wir das Konzept zertifizierender sequentieller Algorithmen so auf verteilte Algorithmen übertragen, dass wir einerseits nah am ursprünglichen Konzept bleiben und andererseits die Gegebenheiten verteilter Systeme berücksichtigen? Wir stellen eine Methode der Übertragung vor. Die beiden Ziele abwägend entwickeln wir eine Klasse zertifizierender verteilter Algorithmen, die verteilte Zeugen berechnen und verteilte Checker besitzen. Wir präsentieren Fallstudien, Entwurfsmuster und ein Framework zur formalen Instanzverifikation.A major problem in software engineering is to ensure the correctness of software. Testing offers no mathematical correctness. Formal verification is often too costly. Runtime verification stands between the two methods. Runtime verification answers the question whether an input-output pair is correct. A certifying algorithm convinces its user at runtime by offering a correctness argument. For each input, a certifying algorithm computes an output and additionally a witness. Each certifying algorithm has a witness predicate – a predicate with the property: being satisfied for an input, output and witness implies the input-output pair is correct. A simple algorithm deciding the witness predicate for the user is a checker. Hence, the checker’s correctness is crucial to the approach and motivates formal instance verification where we verify checkers and obtain machine-checked proofs for the correctness of an input-output pair at runtime. Certifying sequential algorithms are well-established. Distributed algorithms, designed to run on distributed systems, behave fundamentally different from sequential algorithms: their output is distributed over the system or they even run continuously. We investigate certifying distributed algorithms. Our research question is: How can we transfer the concept of certifying sequential algorithms to distributed algorithms such that we are in line with the original concept but also adapt to the conditions of distributed systems? In this thesis, we present a method to transfer the concept: Weighing up both sometimes conflicting goals, we develop a class of certifying distributed algorithms that compute distributed witnesses and have distributed checkers. We offer case studies, design patterns and a framework for formal instance verification. Additionally, we investigate other methods to transfer the concept of certifying algorithms to distributed algorithms