315 research outputs found
The Role of preferences in logic programming: nonmonotonic reasoning, user preferences, decision under uncertainty
Intelligent systems that assist users in fulfilling complex tasks need a concise and processable representation of incomplete and
uncertain information. In order to be able to choose among different options, these systems also need a compact and processable
representation of the concept of preference.
Preferences can provide an effective way to choose the best solutions to a given problem. These solutions can represent the most
plausible states of the world when we model incomplete information, the most satisfactory states of the world when we express
user preferences, or optimal decisions when we make decisions under uncertainty.
Several domains, such as, reasoning under incomplete and uncertain information, user preference modeling, and qualitative
decision making under uncertainty, have benefited from advances on preference representation. In the literature, several symbolic
approaches of nonclassical reasoning have been proposed. Among them, logic programming under answer set semantics offers a
good compromise between symbolic representation and computation of knowledge and several extensions for handling
preferences.
Nevertheless, there are still some open issues to be considered in logic programming. In nonmonotonic reasoning, first, most
approaches assume that exceptions to logic program rules are already specified. However, sometimes, it is possible to consider
implicit preferences based on the specificity of the rules to handle incomplete information. Secondly, the joint handling of
exceptions and uncertainty has received little attention: when information is uncertain, the selection of default rules can be a matter
of explicit preferences and uncertainty. In user preference modeling, although existing logic programming specifications allow to
express user preferences which depend both on incomplete and contextual information, in some applications, some preferences in
some context may be more important than others. Furthermore, more complex preference expressions need to be supported. In
qualitative decision making under uncertainty, existing logic programming-based methodologies for making decisions seem to lack
a satisfactory handling of preferences and uncertainty.
The aim of this dissertation is twofold: 1) to tackle the role played by preferences in logic programming from different perspectives,
and 2) to contribute to this novel field by proposing several frameworks and methods able to address the above issues. To this
end, we will first show how preferences can be used to select default rules in logic programs in an implicit and explicit way. In
particular, we propose (i) a method for selecting logic program rules based on specificity, and (ii) a framework for selecting
uncertain default rules based on explicit preferences and the certainty of the rules. Then, we will see how user preferences can be
modeled and processed in terms of a logic program (iii) in order to manage user profiles in a context-aware system and (iv) in order
to propose a framework for the specification of nested (non-flat) preference expressions. Finally, in the attempt to bridge the gap
between logic programming and qualitative decision under uncertainty, (v) we propose a classical- and a possibilistic-based logic
programming methodology to compute an optimal decision when uncertainty and preferences are matters of degrees.Els sistemes intel.ligents que assisteixen a usuaris en la realització de tasques complexes necessiten
una representació concisa i formal de la informació que permeti un raonament nomonòton
en condicions d’incertesa. Per a poder escollir entre les diferents opcions, aquests
sistemes solen necessitar una representació del concepte de preferència.
Les preferències poden proporcionar una manera efectiva de triar entre les millors solucions
a un problema. Aquestes solucions poden representar els estats del món més plausibles
quan es tracta de modelar informació incompleta, els estats del món més satisfactori
quan expressem preferències de l’usuari, o decisions òptimes quan estem parlant de presa
de decisió incorporant incertesa.
L’ús de les preferències ha beneficiat diferents dominis, com, el raonament en presència
d’informació incompleta i incerta, el modelat de preferències d’usuari, i la presa de decisió
sota incertesa. En la literatura, s’hi troben diferents aproximacions al raonament no clàssic
basades en una representació simbòlica de la informació. Entre elles, l’enfocament de programació
lògica, utilitzant la semàntica de answer set, ofereix una bona aproximació entre
representació i processament simbòlic del coneixement, i diferents extensions per gestionar
les preferències.
No obstant això, en programació lògica es poden identificar diferents problemes pel
que fa a la gestió de les preferències. Per exemple, en la majoria d’enfocaments de raonament
no-monòton s’assumeix que les excepcions a default rules d’un programa lògic ja
estan expressades. Però de vegades es poden considerar preferències implícites basades en
l’especificitat de les regles per gestionar la informació incompleta. A més, quan la informació
és també incerta, la selecció de default rules pot dependre de preferències explícites i de la
incertesa. En el modelatge de preferències del usuari, encara que els formalismes existents
basats en programació lògica permetin expressar preferències que depenen d’informació
contextual i incompleta, en algunes aplicacions, donat un context, algunes preferències
poden ser més importants que unes altres. Per tant, resulta d’interès un llenguatge que
permeti capturar preferències més complexes. En la presa de decisions sota incertesa, les
metodologies basades en programació lògica creades fins ara no ofereixen una solució del
tot satisfactòria pel que fa a la gestió de les preferències i la incertesa.
L’objectiu d’aquesta tesi és doble: 1) estudiar el paper de les preferències en la programació
lògica des de diferents perspectives, i 2) contribuir a aquesta jove àrea d’investigació
proposant diferents marcs teòrics i mètodes per abordar els problemes anteriorment citats.
Per a aquest propòsit veurem com les preferències es poden utilitzar de manera implícita i
explícita per a la selecció de default rules proposant: (i) un mètode basat en l’especificitat
de les regles, que permeti seleccionar regles en un programa lògic; (ii) un marc teòric per a
la selecció de default rules incertes basat en preferències explícites i la incertesa de les regles.
També veurem com les preferències de l’usuari poden ser modelades i processades usant
un enfocament de programació lògica (iii) que suporti la creació d’un mecanisme de gestió
dels perfils dels usuaris en un sistema amb reconeixement del context; (iv) que permeti
proposar un marc teòric capaç d’expressar preferències amb fòrmules imbricades. Per últim,
amb l’objectiu de disminuir la distància entre programació lògica i la presa de decisió
amb incertesa proposem (v) una metodologia basada en programació lògica clàssica i en
una extensió de la programació lògica que incorpora lògica possibilística per modelar un
problema de presa de decisions i per inferir una decisió òptima.Los sistemas inteligentes que asisten a usuarios en tareas complejas necesitan una representación
concisa y procesable de la información que permita un razonamiento nomonótono
e incierto. Para poder escoger entre las diferentes opciones, estos sistemas suelen
necesitar una representación del concepto de preferencia.
Las preferencias pueden proporcionar una manera efectiva para elegir entre las mejores
soluciones a un problema. Dichas soluciones pueden representar los estados del mundo
más plausibles cuando hablamos de representación de información incompleta, los estados
del mundo más satisfactorios cuando hablamos de preferencias del usuario, o decisiones
óptimas cuando estamos hablando de toma de decisión con incertidumbre.
El uso de las preferencias ha beneficiado diferentes dominios, como, razonamiento en
presencia de información incompleta e incierta, modelado de preferencias de usuario, y
toma de decisión con incertidumbre. En la literatura, distintos enfoques simbólicos de razonamiento
no clásico han sido creados. Entre ellos, la programación lógica con la semántica
de answer set ofrece un buen acercamiento entre representación y procesamiento simbólico
del conocimiento, y diferentes extensiones para manejar las preferencias.
Sin embargo, en programación lógica se pueden identificar diferentes problemas con
respecto al manejo de las preferencias. Por ejemplo, en la mayoría de enfoques de razonamiento
no-monótono se asume que las excepciones a default rules de un programa lógico
ya están expresadas. Pero, a veces se pueden considerar preferencias implícitas basadas en
la especificidad de las reglas para manejar la información incompleta. Además, cuando la
información es también incierta, la selección de default rules pueden depender de preferencias
explícitas y de la incertidumbre. En el modelado de preferencias, aunque los formalismos
existentes basados en programación lógica permitan expresar preferencias que
dependen de información contextual e incompleta, in algunas aplicaciones, algunas preferencias
en un contexto puede ser más importantes que otras. Por lo tanto, un lenguaje
que permita capturar preferencias más complejas es deseable. En la toma de decisiones con
incertidumbre, las metodologías basadas en programación lógica creadas hasta ahora no
ofrecen una solución del todo satisfactoria al manejo de las preferencias y la incertidumbre.
El objectivo de esta tesis es doble: 1) estudiar el rol de las preferencias en programación
lógica desde diferentes perspectivas, y 2) contribuir a esta joven área de investigación proponiendo
diferentes marcos teóricos y métodos para abordar los problemas anteriormente
citados. Para este propósito veremos como las preferencias pueden ser usadas de manera implícita y explícita para la selección de default rules proponiendo: (i) un método para
seleccionar reglas en un programa basado en la especificad de las reglas; (ii) un marco
teórico para la selección de default rules basado en preferencias explícitas y incertidumbre.
También veremos como las preferencias del usuario pueden ser modeladas y procesadas
usando un enfoque de programación lógica (iii) para crear un mecanismo de manejo de
los perfiles de los usuarios en un sistema con reconocimiento del contexto; (iv) para crear
un marco teórico capaz de expresar preferencias con formulas anidadas. Por último, con
el objetivo de disminuir la distancia entre programación lógica y la toma de decisión con
incertidumbre proponemos (v) una metodología para modelar un problema de toma de
decisiones y para inferir una decisión óptima usando un enfoque de programación lógica
clásica y uno de programación lógica extendida con lógica posibilística.Sistemi intelligenti, destinati a fornire supporto agli utenti in processi decisionali complessi,
richiedono una rappresentazione dell’informazione concisa, formale e che permetta
di ragionare in maniera non monotona e incerta. Per poter scegliere tra le diverse opzioni,
tali sistemi hanno bisogno di disporre di una rappresentazione del concetto di preferenza
altrettanto concisa e formale.
Le preferenze offrono una maniera efficace per scegliere le miglior soluzioni di un problema.
Tali soluzioni possono rappresentare gli stati del mondo più credibili quando si tratta
di ragionamento non monotono, gli stati del mondo più soddisfacenti quando si tratta delle
preferenze degli utenti, o le decisioni migliori quando prendiamo una decisione in condizioni
di incertezza.
Diversi domini come ad esempio il ragionamento non monotono e incerto, la strutturazione
del profilo utente, e i modelli di decisione in condizioni d’incertezza hanno tratto
beneficio dalla rappresentazione delle preferenze. Nella bibliografia disponibile si possono
incontrare diversi approcci simbolici al ragionamento non classico. Tra questi, la programmazione
logica con answer set semantics offre un buon compromesso tra rappresentazione
simbolica e processamento dell’informazione, e diversi estensioni per la gestione delle preferenze
sono state proposti in tal senso.
Nonostante ció, nella programmazione logica esistono ancora delle problematiche aperte.
Prima di tutto, nella maggior parte degli approcci al ragionamento non monotono, si suppone
che nel programma le eccezioni alle regole siano già specificate. Tuttavia, a volte per
trattare l’informazione incompleta è possibile prendere in considerazione preferenze implicite
basate sulla specificità delle regole. In secondo luogo, la gestione congiunta di eccezioni
e incertezza ha avuto scarsa attenzione: quando l’informazione è incerta, la scelta
di default rule può essere una questione di preferenze esplicite e d’incertezza allo stesso
tempo. Nella creazione di preferenze dell’utente, anche se le specifiche di programmazione
logica esistenti permettono di esprimere preferenze che dipendono sia da un’informazione
incompleta che da una contestuale, in alcune applicazioni talune preferenze possono essere
più importanti di altre, o espressioni più complesse devono essere supportate. In un processo
decisionale con incertezza, le metodologie basate sulla programmazione logica viste
sinora, non offrono una gestione soddisfacente delle preferenze e dell’incertezza.
Lo scopo di questa dissertazione è doppio: 1) chiarire il ruolo che le preferenze giocano
nella programmazione logica da diverse prospettive e 2) contribuire proponendo in questo nuovo settore di ricerca, diversi framework e metodi in grado di affrontare le citate
problematiche. Per prima cosa, dimostreremo come le preferenze possono essere usate per
selezionare default rule in un programma in maniera implicita ed esplicita. In particolare
proporremo: (i) un metodo per la selezione delle regole di un programma logico basato
sulla specificità dell’informazione; (ii) un framework per la selezione di default rule basato
sulle preferenze esplicite e sull’incertezza associata alle regole del programma. Poi, vedremo
come le preferenze degli utenti possono essere modellate attraverso un programma
logico, (iii) per creare il profilo dell’utente in un sistema context-aware, e (iv) per proporre
un framework che supporti la definizione di preferenze complesse. Infine, per colmare le
lacune in programmazione logica applicata a un processo di decisione con incertezza (v)
proporremo una metodologia basata sulla programmazione logica classica e una metodologia
basata su un’estensione della programmazione logica con logica possibilistica
Weighted logics for artificial intelligence : an introductory discussion
International audienceBefore presenting the contents of the special issue, we propose a structured introductory overview of a landscape of the weighted logics (in a general sense) that can be found in the Artificial Intelligence literature, highlighting their fundamental differences and their application areas
A Probabilistic Modelling Approach for Rational Belief in Meta-Epistemic Contexts
This work is part of the larger project INTEGRITY. Integrity develops a conceptual frame integrating beliefs with individual (and consensual group) decision making and action based on belief awareness. Comments and criticisms are most welcome via email.
The text introduces the conceptual (internalism, externalism), quantitative (probabilism) and logical perspectives (logics for reasoning about probabilities by Fagin, Halpern, Megiddo and MEL by Banerjee, Dubois) for the framework
A Probabilistic Modelling Approach for Rational Belief in Meta-Epistemic Contexts
This work is part of the larger project INTEGRITY. Integrity develops a conceptual frame integrating beliefs
with individual (and consensual group) decision making and action based on belief awareness. Comments and
criticisms are most welcome via email.
Starting with a thorough discussion of the conceptual embedding in existing schools of thought and liter-
ature we develop a framework that aims to be empirically adequate yet scalable to epistemic states where an
agent might testify to uncertainly believe a propositional formula based on the acceptance that a propositional
formula is possible, called accepted truth. The familiarity of human agents with probability assignments make
probabilism particularly appealing as quantitative modelling framework for defeasible reasoning that aspires
empirical adequacy for gradual belief expressed as credence functions. We employ the inner measure induced
by the probability measure, going back to Halmos, interpreted as estimate for uncertainty. Doing so omits
generally requiring direct probability assignments testi�ed as strength of belief and uncertainty by a human
agent. We provide a logical setting of the two concepts uncertain belief and accepted truth, completely relying
on the the formal frameworks of 'Reasoning about Probabilities' developed by Fagin, Halpern and Megiddo and
the 'Metaepistemic logic MEL' developed by Banerjee and Dubois. The purport of Probabilistic Uncertainty is
a framework allowing with a single quantitative concept (an inner measure induced by a probability measure)
expressing two epistemological concepts: possibilities as belief simpliciter called accepted truth, and the agents'
credence called uncertain belief for a criterion of evaluation, called rationality. The propositions accepted to be
possible form the meta-epistemic context(s) in which the agent can reason and testify uncertain belief or suspend
judgement
A Probabilistic Modelling Approach for Rational Belief in Meta-Epistemic Contexts
This work is part of the larger project INTEGRITY. Integrity develops a conceptual frame integrating beliefs with individual (and consensual group) decision making and action based on belief awareness. Comments and criticisms are most welcome via email.
The text introduces the conceptual (internalism, externalism), quantitative (probabilism) and logical perspectives (logics for reasoning about probabilities by Fagin, Halpern, Megiddo and MEL by Banerjee, Dubois) for the framework
A Probabilistic Modelling Approach for Rational Belief in Meta-Epistemic Contexts
This work is part of the larger project INTEGRITY. Integrity develops a conceptual frame integrating beliefs
with individual (and consensual group) decision making and action based on belief awareness. Comments and
criticisms are most welcome via email.
Starting with a thorough discussion of the conceptual embedding in existing schools of thought and liter-
ature we develop a framework that aims to be empirically adequate yet scalable to epistemic states where an
agent might testify to uncertainly believe a propositional formula based on the acceptance that a propositional
formula is possible, called accepted truth. The familiarity of human agents with probability assignments make
probabilism particularly appealing as quantitative modelling framework for defeasible reasoning that aspires
empirical adequacy for gradual belief expressed as credence functions. We employ the inner measure induced
by the probability measure, going back to Halmos, interpreted as estimate for uncertainty. Doing so omits
generally requiring direct probability assignments testi�ed as strength of belief and uncertainty by a human
agent. We provide a logical setting of the two concepts uncertain belief and accepted truth, completely relying
on the the formal frameworks of 'Reasoning about Probabilities' developed by Fagin, Halpern and Megiddo and
the 'Metaepistemic logic MEL' developed by Banerjee and Dubois. The purport of Probabilistic Uncertainty is
a framework allowing with a single quantitative concept (an inner measure induced by a probability measure)
expressing two epistemological concepts: possibilities as belief simpliciter called accepted truth, and the agents'
credence called uncertain belief for a criterion of evaluation, called rationality. The propositions accepted to be
possible form the meta-epistemic context(s) in which the agent can reason and testify uncertain belief or suspend
judgement
Approaches to uncertain or imprecise rules: a survey
With this paper we present a brief overview of selected prominent approaches to rule frameworks and formal rule languages for the representation of and reasoning with uncertain or imprecise knowledge. This work covers selected probabilistic and possibilistic logics, as well as implementations of uncertainty and possibilistic reasoning in rule engine software
Other uncertainty theories based on capacities
International audienceThe two main uncertainty representations in the literature that tolerate imprecision are possibility distributions and random disjunctive sets. This chapter devotes special attention to the theories that have emerged from them. The first part of the chapter discusses epistemic logic and derives the need for capturing imprecision in information representations. It bridges the gap between uncertainty theories and epistemic logic showing that imprecise probabilities subsume modalities of possibility and necessity as much as probability. The second part presents possibility and evidence theories, their origins, assumptions and semantics, discusses the connections between them and the general framework of imprecise probability. Finally, chapter points out the remaining discrepancies between the different theories regarding various basic notions, such as conditioning, independence or information fusion and the existing bridges between them
Representing archaeological uncertainty in cultural informatics
This thesis sets out to explore, describe, quantify, and visualise uncertainty in a
cultural informatics context, with a focus on archaeological reconstructions. For quite
some time, archaeologists and heritage experts have been criticising the often toorealistic
appearance of three-dimensional reconstructions. They have been highlighting
one of the unique features of archaeology: the information we have on our heritage
will always be incomplete. This incompleteness should be reflected in digitised
reconstructions of the past.
This criticism is the driving force behind this thesis. The research examines archaeological
theory and inferential process and provides insight into computer visualisation.
It describes how these two areas, of archaeology and computer graphics,
have formed a useful, but often tumultuous, relationship through the years.
By examining the uncertainty background of disciplines such as GIS, medicine,
and law, the thesis postulates that archaeological visualisation, in order to mature,
must move towards archaeological knowledge visualisation. Three sequential areas
are proposed through this thesis for the initial exploration of archaeological uncertainty:
identification, quantification and modelling. The main contributions of the
thesis lie in those three areas.
Firstly, through the innovative design, distribution, and analysis of a questionnaire,
the thesis identifies the importance of uncertainty in archaeological interpretation
and discovers potential preferences among different evidence types.
Secondly, the thesis uniquely analyses and evaluates, in relation to archaeological
uncertainty, three different belief quantification models. The varying ways that these
mathematical models work, are also evaluated through simulated experiments. Comparison
of results indicates significant convergence between the models.
Thirdly, a novel approach to archaeological uncertainty and evidence conflict visualisation
is presented, influenced by information visualisation schemes. Lastly, suggestions
for future semantic extensions to this research are presented through the
design and development of new plugins to a search engine
Viewpoints on emergent semantics
Authors include:Philippe Cudr´e-Mauroux, and Karl Aberer (editors),
Alia I. Abdelmoty, Tiziana Catarci, Ernesto Damiani,
Arantxa Illaramendi, Robert Meersman,
Erich J. Neuhold, Christine Parent, Kai-Uwe Sattler,
Monica Scannapieco, Stefano Spaccapietra,
Peter Spyns, and Guy De Tr´eWe introduce a novel view on how to deal with the problems of semantic interoperability in distributed systems. This view is based on the concept of emergent semantics, which sees both the representation of semantics and the discovery of the proper interpretation of symbols as the result of a self-organizing process performed by distributed agents exchanging symbols and having utilities dependent on the proper interpretation of the symbols. This is a complex systems perspective on the problem of dealing with semantics. We highlight some of the distinctive features of our vision and point out preliminary examples of its applicatio
- …