Evidence-Based Detection of Pancreatic Canc

This study is an effort to develop a tool for early detection of pancreatic cancer using evidential reasoning. An evidential reasoning model predicts the likelihood of an individual developing pancreatic cancer by processing the outputs of a Support Vector Classifier, and other input factors such as smoking history, drinking history, sequencing reads, biopsy location, family and personal health history. Certain features of the genomic data along with the mutated gene sequence of pancreatic cancer patients was obtained from the National Cancer Institute (NIH) Genomic Data Commons (GDC). This data was used to train the SVC. A prediction accuracy of ~85% with a ROC AUC of 83.4% was achieved. Synthetic data was assembled in different combinations to evaluate the working of evidential reasoning model. Using this, variations in the belief interval of developing pancreatic cancer are observed. When the model is provided with an input of high smoking history and family history of cancer, an increase in the evidential reasoning interval in belief of pancreatic cancer and support in the machine learning model prediction is observed. Likewise, decrease in the quantity of genetic material and an irregularity in the cellular structure near the pancreas increases support in the machine learning classifier’s prediction of having pancreatic cancer. This evidence-based approach is an attempt to diagnose the pancreatic cancer at a premalignant stage. Future work includes using the real sequencing reads as well as accurate habits and real medical and family history of individuals to increase the efficiency of the evidential reasoning model. Next steps also involve trying out different machine learning models to observe their performance on the dataset considered in this study

IJCAI-ECAI Workshop “Interactions between Analogical Reasoning and Machine Learning” (IARML 2022)

International audienceAnalogical reasoning is a remarkable capability of human reasoning, used to solve hard reasoning tasks. It consists in transferring knowledge from a source domain to a different, but somewhat similar, target domain by relying simultaneously on similarities and dissimilarities. In particular, analogical proportions, i.e., statements of the form “A is to B as C is to D", are the basis of analogical inference. Analogical reasoning is pertaining to case-based reasoning and it has contributed to multiple machine learning tasks such as classification, decision making, and automatic translation with competitive results. Moreover, analogical extrapolation can support dataset augmentation (analogical extension) for model learning,especially in environments with few labeled examples. Conversely, advanced neural techniques, such as representation learning, enabled efficient approaches to detecting and solving analogies in domains where symbolic approaches had shown their limits. However, recent approaches using deep learning architectures remain task and domain specific, and strongly rely on ad-hoc representations of objects, i.e., tailor made embeddings.The first workshop Interactions between Analogical Reasoning and Machine Learning (IARML) was hosted by the 31st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence and the 25th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-ECAI 2022). It brought together AI researchers at the cross roads of machine learning, cognitive sciences and knowledge representation and reasoning, who are interested by the various applications of analogical reasoning in machine learning or, conversely, of machine learning techniques to improve analogical reasoning. The IARML workshop aims to bridge gaps between different AI communities, including case-based reasoning, deep learning and neuro-symbolic machine learning. The workshop welcomed submissions of research papers on all topics at the intersection of analogical reasoning and machine learning. The submissions were subjected to a strict double-blind reviewing process that resulted in the selection of six original contributions and two invited talks, in addition to the two plenary keynote talks

MACHINE LEARNING - TECHNIQUES

This article provides a comprehensive overview of software development expertise using machine learning techniques (MLT). Machine learning in this new era demonstrates the commitment to consistently make accurate estimates. The machine learning system effectively “learns” how to evaluate from the training package of completed projects. The main goal and contribution of the review is to support research on expert assessment, i.e. to facilitate other researchers to make relevant expert assessment studies using machine learning techniques. This article presents commonly used machine learning techniques such as neural networks for expert evaluation in the field of software development, case-based reasoning, classification and regression trees, induction, genetic algorithm and genetic programming. In each of our studies, we found that the results of different machine learning techniques depend on the areas in which they are used. The review of our study not only indicates that these techniques compete with traditional evaluators in a data set, but also illustrate that these methods are sensitive to the data on which they are trained