1,730 research outputs found

    From Fibonacci Numbers to Central Limit Type Theorems

    Get PDF
    A beautiful theorem of Zeckendorf states that every integer can be written uniquely as a sum of non-consecutive Fibonacci numbers {Fn}n=1∞\{F_n\}_{n=1}^{\infty}. Lekkerkerker proved that the average number of summands for integers in [Fn,Fn+1)[F_n, F_{n+1}) is n/(Ο•2+1)n/(\phi^2 + 1), with Ο•\phi the golden mean. This has been generalized to the following: given nonnegative integers c1,c2,...,cLc_1,c_2,...,c_L with c1,cL>0c_1,c_L>0 and recursive sequence {Hn}n=1∞\{H_n\}_{n=1}^{\infty} with H1=1H_1=1, Hn+1=c1Hn+c2Hnβˆ’1+...+cnH1+1H_{n+1} =c_1H_n+c_2H_{n-1}+...+c_nH_1+1 (1≀n<L)(1\le n< L) and Hn+1=c1Hn+c2Hnβˆ’1+...+cLHn+1βˆ’LH_{n+1}=c_1H_n+c_2H_{n-1}+...+c_LH_{n+1-L} (nβ‰₯L)(n\geq L), every positive integer can be written uniquely as βˆ‘aiHi\sum a_iH_i under natural constraints on the aia_i's, the mean and the variance of the numbers of summands for integers in [Hn,Hn+1)[H_{n}, H_{n+1}) are of size nn, and the distribution of the numbers of summands converges to a Gaussian as nn goes to the infinity. Previous approaches used number theory or ergodic theory. We convert the problem to a combinatorial one. In addition to re-deriving these results, our method generalizes to a multitude of other problems (in the sequel paper \cite{BM} we show how this perspective allows us to determine the distribution of gaps between summands in decompositions). For example, it is known that every integer can be written uniquely as a sum of the Β±Fn\pm F_n's, such that every two terms of the same (opposite) sign differ in index by at least 4 (3). The presence of negative summands introduces complications and features not seen in previous problems. We prove that the distribution of the numbers of positive and negative summands converges to a bivariate normal with computable, negative correlation, namely βˆ’(21βˆ’2Ο•)/(29+2Ο•)β‰ˆβˆ’0.551058-(21-2\phi)/(29+2\phi) \approx -0.551058.Comment: This is a companion paper to Kologlu, Kopp, Miller and Wang's On the number of summands in Zeckendorf decompositions. Version 2.0 (mostly correcting missing references to previous literature

    Gaussian Behavior of the Number of Summands in Zeckendorf Decompositions in Small Intervals

    Full text link
    Zeckendorf's theorem states that every positive integer can be written uniquely as a sum of non-consecutive Fibonacci numbers Fn{F_n}, with initial terms F1=1,F2=2F_1 = 1, F_2 = 2. We consider the distribution of the number of summands involved in such decompositions. Previous work proved that as nβ†’βˆžn \to \infty the distribution of the number of summands in the Zeckendorf decompositions of m∈[Fn,Fn+1)m \in [F_n, F_{n+1}), appropriately normalized, converges to the standard normal. The proofs crucially used the fact that all integers in [Fn,Fn+1)[F_n, F_{n+1}) share the same potential summands. We generalize these results to subintervals of [Fn,Fn+1)[F_n, F_{n+1}) as nβ†’βˆžn \to \infty; the analysis is significantly more involved here as different integers have different sets of potential summands. Explicitly, fix an integer sequence Ξ±(n)β†’βˆž\alpha(n) \to \infty. As nβ†’βˆžn \to \infty, for almost all m∈[Fn,Fn+1)m \in [F_n, F_{n+1}) the distribution of the number of summands in the Zeckendorf decompositions of integers in the subintervals [m,m+FΞ±(n))[m, m + F_{\alpha(n)}), appropriately normalized, converges to the standard normal. The proof follows by showing that, with probability tending to 11, mm has at least one appropriately located large gap between indices in its decomposition. We then use a correspondence between this interval and [0,FΞ±(n))[0, F_{\alpha(n)}) to obtain the result, since the summands are known to have Gaussian behavior in the latter interval. % We also prove the same result for more general linear recurrences.Comment: Version 1.0, 8 page

    A Probabilistic Approach to Generalized Zeckendorf Decompositions

    Full text link
    Generalized Zeckendorf decompositions are expansions of integers as sums of elements of solutions to recurrence relations. The simplest cases are base-bb expansions, and the standard Zeckendorf decomposition uses the Fibonacci sequence. The expansions are finite sequences of nonnegative integer coefficients (satisfying certain technical conditions to guarantee uniqueness of the decomposition) and which can be viewed as analogs of sequences of variable-length words made from some fixed alphabet. In this paper we present a new approach and construction for uniform measures on expansions, identifying them as the distribution of a Markov chain conditioned not to hit a set. This gives a unified approach that allows us to easily recover results on the expansions from analogous results for Markov chains, and in this paper we focus on laws of large numbers, central limit theorems for sums of digits, and statements on gaps (zeros) in expansions. We expect the approach to prove useful in other similar contexts.Comment: Version 1.0, 25 pages. Keywords: Zeckendorf decompositions, positive linear recurrence relations, distribution of gaps, longest gap, Markov processe

    Benford Behavior of Zeckendorf Decompositions

    Full text link
    A beautiful theorem of Zeckendorf states that every integer can be written uniquely as the sum of non-consecutive Fibonacci numbers {Fi}i=1∞\{ F_i \}_{i = 1}^{\infty}. A set SβŠ‚ZS \subset \mathbb{Z} is said to satisfy Benford's law if the density of the elements in SS with leading digit dd is log⁑10(1+1d)\log_{10}{(1+\frac{1}{d})}; in other words, smaller leading digits are more likely to occur. We prove that, as nβ†’βˆžn\to\infty, for a randomly selected integer mm in [0,Fn+1)[0, F_{n+1}) the distribution of the leading digits of the Fibonacci summands in its Zeckendorf decomposition converge to Benford's law almost surely. Our results hold more generally, and instead of looking at the distribution of leading digits one obtains similar theorems concerning how often values in sets with density are attained.Comment: Version 1.0, 12 pages, 1 figur
    • …
    corecore