7,805 research outputs found
Formal Probabilistic Analysis of a Wireless Sensor Network for Forest Fire Detection
Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) have been widely explored for forest fire
detection, which is considered a fatal threat throughout the world. Energy
conservation of sensor nodes is one of the biggest challenges in this context
and random scheduling is frequently applied to overcome that. The performance
analysis of these random scheduling approaches is traditionally done by
paper-and-pencil proof methods or simulation. These traditional techniques
cannot ascertain 100% accuracy, and thus are not suitable for analyzing a
safety-critical application like forest fire detection using WSNs. In this
paper, we propose to overcome this limitation by applying formal probabilistic
analysis using theorem proving to verify scheduling performance of a real-world
WSN for forest fire detection using a k-set randomized algorithm as an energy
saving mechanism. In particular, we formally verify the expected values of
coverage intensity, the upper bound on the total number of disjoint subsets,
for a given coverage intensity, and the lower bound on the total number of
nodes.Comment: In Proceedings SCSS 2012, arXiv:1307.802
Formal analysis techniques for gossiping protocols
We give a survey of formal verification techniques that can be used to corroborate existing experimental results for gossiping protocols in a rigorous manner. We present properties of interest for gossiping protocols and discuss how various formal evaluation techniques can be employed to predict them
Model checking medium access control for sensor networks
We describe verification of S-MAC, a medium access control protocol designed for wireless sensor networks, by means of the PRISM model checker. The S-MAC protocol is built on top of the IEEE 802.11 standard for wireless ad hoc networks and, as such, it uses the same randomised backoff procedure as a means to avoid collision. In order to minimise energy consumption, in S-MAC, nodes are periodically put into a sleep state. Synchronisation of the sleeping schedules is necessary for the nodes to be able to communicate. Intuitively, energy saving obtained through a periodic sleep mechanism will be at the expense of performance. In previous work on S-MAC verification, a combination of analytical techniques and simulation has been used to confirm the correctness of this intuition for a simplified (abstract) version of the protocol in which the initial schedules coordination phase is assumed correct. We show how we have used the PRISM model checker to verify the behaviour of S-MAC and compare it to that of IEEE 802.11
Resilient networking in wireless sensor networks
This report deals with security in wireless sensor networks (WSNs),
especially in network layer. Multiple secure routing protocols have been
proposed in the literature. However, they often use the cryptography to secure
routing functionalities. The cryptography alone is not enough to defend against
multiple attacks due to the node compromise. Therefore, we need more
algorithmic solutions. In this report, we focus on the behavior of routing
protocols to determine which properties make them more resilient to attacks.
Our aim is to find some answers to the following questions. Are there any
existing protocols, not designed initially for security, but which already
contain some inherently resilient properties against attacks under which some
portion of the network nodes is compromised? If yes, which specific behaviors
are making these protocols more resilient? We propose in this report an
overview of security strategies for WSNs in general, including existing attacks
and defensive measures. In this report we focus at the network layer in
particular, and an analysis of the behavior of four particular routing
protocols is provided to determine their inherent resiliency to insider
attacks. The protocols considered are: Dynamic Source Routing (DSR),
Gradient-Based Routing (GBR), Greedy Forwarding (GF) and Random Walk Routing
(RWR)
Extremal Properties of Three Dimensional Sensor Networks with Applications
In this paper, we analyze various critical transmitting/sensing ranges for
connectivity and coverage in three-dimensional sensor networks. As in other
large-scale complex systems, many global parameters of sensor networks undergo
phase transitions: For a given property of the network, there is a critical
threshold, corresponding to the minimum amount of the communication effort or
power expenditure by individual nodes, above (resp. below) which the property
exists with high (resp. a low) probability. For sensor networks, properties of
interest include simple and multiple degrees of connectivity/coverage. First,
we investigate the network topology according to the region of deployment, the
number of deployed sensors and their transmitting/sensing ranges. More
specifically, we consider the following problems: Assume that nodes, each
capable of sensing events within a radius of , are randomly and uniformly
distributed in a 3-dimensional region of volume , how large
must the sensing range be to ensure a given degree of coverage of the region to
monitor? For a given transmission range, what is the minimum (resp. maximum)
degree of the network? What is then the typical hop-diameter of the underlying
network? Next, we show how these results affect algorithmic aspects of the
network by designing specific distributed protocols for sensor networks
RTXP : A Localized Real-Time Mac-Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks
Protocols developed during the last years for Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs)
are mainly focused on energy efficiency and autonomous mechanisms (e.g.
self-organization, self-configuration, etc). Nevertheless, with new WSN
applications, appear new QoS requirements such as time constraints. Real-time
applications require the packets to be delivered before a known time bound
which depends on the application requirements. We particularly focus on
applications which consist in alarms sent to the sink node. We propose
Real-Time X-layer Protocol (RTXP), a real-time communication protocol. To the
best of our knowledge, RTXP is the first MAC and routing real-time
communication protocol that is not centralized, but instead relies only on
local information. The solution is cross-layer (X-layer) because it allows to
control the delays due to MAC and Routing layers interactions. RTXP uses a
suited hop-count-based Virtual Coordinate System which allows deterministic
medium access and forwarder selection. In this paper we describe the protocol
mechanisms. We give theoretical bound on the end-to-end delay and the capacity
of the protocol. Intensive simulation results confirm the theoretical
predictions and allow to compare with a real-time centralized solution. RTXP is
also simulated under harsh radio channel, in this case the radio link
introduces probabilistic behavior. Nevertheless, we show that RTXP it performs
better than a non-deterministic solution. It thus advocates for the usefulness
of designing real-time (deterministic) protocols even for highly unreliable
networks such as WSNs
- …