1,092 research outputs found

    Heavy subgraphs, stability and hamiltonicity

    Full text link
    Let GG be a graph. Adopting the terminology of Broersma et al. and \v{C}ada, respectively, we say that GG is 2-heavy if every induced claw (K1,3K_{1,3}) of GG contains two end-vertices each one has degree at least ∣V(G)∣/2|V(G)|/2; and GG is o-heavy if every induced claw of GG contains two end-vertices with degree sum at least ∣V(G)∣|V(G)| in GG. In this paper, we introduce a new concept, and say that GG is \emph{SS-c-heavy} if for a given graph SS and every induced subgraph G′G' of GG isomorphic to SS and every maximal clique CC of G′G', every non-trivial component of G′−CG'-C contains a vertex of degree at least ∣V(G)∣/2|V(G)|/2 in GG. In terms of this concept, our original motivation that a theorem of Hu in 1999 can be stated as every 2-connected 2-heavy and NN-c-heavy graph is hamiltonian, where NN is the graph obtained from a triangle by adding three disjoint pendant edges. In this paper, we will characterize all connected graphs SS such that every 2-connected o-heavy and SS-c-heavy graph is hamiltonian. Our work results in a different proof of a stronger version of Hu's theorem. Furthermore, our main result improves or extends several previous results.Comment: 21 pages, 6 figures, finial version for publication in Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theor

    Assessing the Computational Complexity of Multi-Layer Subgraph Detection

    Get PDF
    Multi-layer graphs consist of several graphs (layers) over the same vertex set. They are motivated by real-world problems where entities (vertices) are associated via multiple types of relationships (edges in different layers). We chart the border of computational (in)tractability for the class of subgraph detection problems on multi-layer graphs, including fundamental problems such as maximum matching, finding certain clique relaxations (motivated by community detection), or path problems. Mostly encountering hardness results, sometimes even for two or three layers, we can also spot some islands of tractability

    Hamiltonian chordal graphs are not cycle extendible

    Full text link
    In 1990, Hendry conjectured that every Hamiltonian chordal graph is cycle extendible; that is, the vertices of any non-Hamiltonian cycle are contained in a cycle of length one greater. We disprove this conjecture by constructing counterexamples on nn vertices for any n≥15n \geq 15. Furthermore, we show that there exist counterexamples where the ratio of the length of a non-extendible cycle to the total number of vertices can be made arbitrarily small. We then consider cycle extendibility in Hamiltonian chordal graphs where certain induced subgraphs are forbidden, notably PnP_n and the bull.Comment: Some results from Section 3 were incorrect and have been removed. To appear in SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematic

    Forbidden subgraphs that imply Hamiltonian-connectedness

    Get PDF
    It is proven that if GG is a 33-connected claw-free graph which is also Z3Z_3-free (where Z3Z_3 is a triangle with a path of length 33 attached), P6P_6-free (where P6P_6 is a path with 66 vertices) or H1H_1-free (where H1H_1 consists of two disjoint triangles connected by an edge), then GG is Hamiltonian-connected. Also, examples will be described that determine a finite family of graphs L\cal{L} such that if a 3-connected graph being claw-free and LL-free implies GG is Hamiltonian-connected, then L∈LL\in\cal{L}. \u
    • …
    corecore