672 research outputs found
Parameterized Algorithmics for Computational Social Choice: Nine Research Challenges
Computational Social Choice is an interdisciplinary research area involving
Economics, Political Science, and Social Science on the one side, and
Mathematics and Computer Science (including Artificial Intelligence and
Multiagent Systems) on the other side. Typical computational problems studied
in this field include the vulnerability of voting procedures against attacks,
or preference aggregation in multi-agent systems. Parameterized Algorithmics is
a subfield of Theoretical Computer Science seeking to exploit meaningful
problem-specific parameters in order to identify tractable special cases of in
general computationally hard problems. In this paper, we propose nine of our
favorite research challenges concerning the parameterized complexity of
problems appearing in this context
Multiwinner Analogues of Plurality Rule: Axiomatic and Algorithmic Perspectives
We characterize the class of committee scoring rules that satisfy the
fixed-majority criterion. In some sense, the committee scoring rules in this
class are multiwinner analogues of the single-winner Plurality rule, which is
uniquely characterized as the only single-winner scoring rule that satisfies
the simple majority criterion. We define top--counting committee scoring
rules and show that the fixed majority consistent rules are a subclass of the
top--counting rules. We give necessary and sufficient conditions for a
top--counting rule to satisfy the fixed-majority criterion. We find that,
for most of the rules in our new class, the complexity of winner determination
is high (that is, the problem of computing the winners is NP-hard), but we also
show examples of rules with polynomial-time winner determination procedures.
For some of the computationally hard rules, we provide either exact FPT
algorithms or approximate polynomial-time algorithms
Fixed-Parameter Algorithms for Computing Kemeny Scores - Theory and Practice
The central problem in this work is to compute a ranking of a set of elements
which is "closest to" a given set of input rankings of the elements. We define
"closest to" in an established way as having the minimum sum of Kendall-Tau
distances to each input ranking. Unfortunately, the resulting problem Kemeny
consensus is NP-hard for instances with n input rankings, n being an even
integer greater than three. Nevertheless this problem plays a central role in
many rank aggregation problems. It was shown that one can compute the
corresponding Kemeny consensus list in f(k) + poly(n) time, being f(k) a
computable function in one of the parameters "score of the consensus", "maximum
distance between two input rankings", "number of candidates" and "average
pairwise Kendall-Tau distance" and poly(n) a polynomial in the input size. This
work will demonstrate the practical usefulness of the corresponding algorithms
by applying them to randomly generated and several real-world data. Thus, we
show that these fixed-parameter algorithms are not only of theoretical
interest. In a more theoretical part of this work we will develop an improved
fixed-parameter algorithm for the parameter "score of the consensus" having a
better upper bound for the running time than previous algorithms.Comment: Studienarbei
Multivariate Analyis of Swap Bribery
We consider the computational complexity of a problem modeling bribery in the
context of voting systems. In the scenario of Swap Bribery, each voter assigns
a certain price for swapping the positions of two consecutive candidates in his
preference ranking. The question is whether it is possible, without exceeding a
given budget, to bribe the voters in a way that the preferred candidate wins in
the election. We initiate a parameterized and multivariate complexity analysis
of Swap Bribery, focusing on the case of k-approval. We investigate how
different cost functions affect the computational complexity of the problem. We
identify a special case of k-approval for which the problem can be solved in
polynomial time, whereas we prove NP-hardness for a slightly more general
scenario. We obtain fixed-parameter tractability as well as W[1]-hardness
results for certain natural parameters.Comment: 20 pages. Conference version published at IPEC 201
- …