124 research outputs found

    Fixed-Parameter Algorithms for Rectilinear Steiner tree and Rectilinear Traveling Salesman Problem in the plane

    Full text link
    Given a set PP of nn points with their pairwise distances, the traveling salesman problem (TSP) asks for a shortest tour that visits each point exactly once. A TSP instance is rectilinear when the points lie in the plane and the distance considered between two points is the l1l_1 distance. In this paper, a fixed-parameter algorithm for the Rectilinear TSP is presented and relies on techniques for solving TSP on bounded-treewidth graphs. It proves that the problem can be solved in O(nh7h)O\left(nh7^h\right) where hnh \leq n denotes the number of horizontal lines containing the points of PP. The same technique can be directly applied to the problem of finding a shortest rectilinear Steiner tree that interconnects the points of PP providing a O(nh5h)O\left(nh5^h\right) time complexity. Both bounds improve over the best time bounds known for these problems.Comment: 24 pages, 13 figures, 6 table

    The Geometric Maximum Traveling Salesman Problem

    Full text link
    We consider the traveling salesman problem when the cities are points in R^d for some fixed d and distances are computed according to geometric distances, determined by some norm. We show that for any polyhedral norm, the problem of finding a tour of maximum length can be solved in polynomial time. If arithmetic operations are assumed to take unit time, our algorithms run in time O(n^{f-2} log n), where f is the number of facets of the polyhedron determining the polyhedral norm. Thus for example we have O(n^2 log n) algorithms for the cases of points in the plane under the Rectilinear and Sup norms. This is in contrast to the fact that finding a minimum length tour in each case is NP-hard. Our approach can be extended to the more general case of quasi-norms with not necessarily symmetric unit ball, where we get a complexity of O(n^{2f-2} log n). For the special case of two-dimensional metrics with f=4 (which includes the Rectilinear and Sup norms), we present a simple algorithm with O(n) running time. The algorithm does not use any indirect addressing, so its running time remains valid even in comparison based models in which sorting requires Omega(n \log n) time. The basic mechanism of the algorithm provides some intuition on why polyhedral norms allow fast algorithms. Complementing the results on simplicity for polyhedral norms, we prove that for the case of Euclidean distances in R^d for d>2, the Maximum TSP is NP-hard. This sheds new light on the well-studied difficulties of Euclidean distances.Comment: 24 pages, 6 figures; revised to appear in Journal of the ACM. (clarified some minor points, fixed typos

    Exact algorithms for the order picking problem

    Full text link
    Order picking is the problem of collecting a set of products in a warehouse in a minimum amount of time. It is currently a major bottleneck in supply-chain because of its cost in time and labor force. This article presents two exact and effective algorithms for this problem. Firstly, a sparse formulation in mixed-integer programming is strengthened by preprocessing and valid inequalities. Secondly, a dynamic programming approach generalizing known algorithms for two or three cross-aisles is proposed and evaluated experimentally. Performances of these algorithms are reported and compared with the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) solver Concorde

    A Gap-{ETH}-Tight Approximation Scheme for Euclidean {TSP}

    Get PDF
    We revisit the classic task of finding the shortest tour of nn points in dd-dimensional Euclidean space, for any fixed constant d2d \geq 2. We determine the optimal dependence on ε\varepsilon in the running time of an algorithm that computes a (1+ε)(1+\varepsilon)-approximate tour, under a plausible assumption. Specifically, we give an algorithm that runs in 2O(1/εd1)nlogn2^{\mathcal{O}(1/\varepsilon^{d-1})} n\log n time. This improves the previously smallest dependence on ε\varepsilon in the running time (1/ε)O(1/εd1)nlogn(1/\varepsilon)^{\mathcal{O}(1/\varepsilon^{d-1})}n \log n of the algorithm by Rao and Smith (STOC 1998). We also show that a 2o(1/εd1)poly(n)2^{o(1/\varepsilon^{d-1})}\text{poly}(n) algorithm would violate the Gap-Exponential Time Hypothesis (Gap-ETH). Our new algorithm builds upon the celebrated quadtree-based methods initially proposed by Arora (J. ACM 1998), but it adds a simple new idea that we call \emph{sparsity-sensitive patching}. On a high level this lets the granularity with which we simplify the tour depend on how sparse it is locally. Our approach is (arguably) simpler than the one by Rao and Smith since it can work without geometric spanners. We demonstrate the technique extends easily to other problems, by showing as an example that it also yields a Gap-ETH-tight approximation scheme for Rectilinear Steiner Tree

    Two-Level Rectilinear Steiner Trees

    Get PDF
    Given a set PP of terminals in the plane and a partition of PP into kk subsets P1,...,PkP_1, ..., P_k, a two-level rectilinear Steiner tree consists of a rectilinear Steiner tree TiT_i connecting the terminals in each set PiP_i (i=1,...,ki=1,...,k) and a top-level tree TtopT_{top} connecting the trees T1,...,TkT_1, ..., T_k. The goal is to minimize the total length of all trees. This problem arises naturally in the design of low-power physical implementations of parity functions on a computer chip. For bounded kk we present a polynomial time approximation scheme (PTAS) that is based on Arora's PTAS for rectilinear Steiner trees after lifting each partition into an extra dimension. For the general case we propose an algorithm that predetermines a connection point for each TiT_i and TtopT_{top} (i=1,...,ki=1,...,k). Then, we apply any approximation algorithm for minimum rectilinear Steiner trees in the plane to compute each TiT_i and TtopT_{top} independently. This gives us a 2.372.37-factor approximation with a running time of O(PlogP)\mathcal{O}(|P|\log|P|) suitable for fast practical computations. The approximation factor reduces to 1.631.63 by applying Arora's approximation scheme in the plane

    Using ant colony optimization for routing in microprocesors

    Get PDF
    Power consumption is an important constraint on VLSI systems. With the advancement in technology, it is now possible to pack a large range of functionalities into VLSI devices. Hence it is important to find out ways to utilize these functionalities with optimized power consumption. This work focuses on curbing power consumption at the design stage. This work emphasizes minimizing active power consumption by minimizing the load capacitance of the chip. Capacitance of wires and vias can be minimized using Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) algorithms. ACO provides a multi agent framework for combinatorial optimization problems and hence is used to handle multiple constraints of minimizing wire-length and vias to achieve the goal of minimizing capacitance and hence power consumption. The ACO developed here is able to achieve an 8% reduction of wire-length and 7% reduction in vias thereby providing a 7% reduction in total capacitance, compared to other state of the art routers

    Genetic Algorithm Based Automation Methods for Route Optimization Problems

    Get PDF

    Subadditive Euclidean Functionals and Nonlinear Growth in Geometric Probability

    Get PDF
    A limit theorem is established for a class of random processes (called here subadditive Euclidean functionals) which arise in problems of geometric probability. Particular examples include the length of shortest path through a random sample, the length of a rectilinear Steiner tree spanned by a sample, and the length of a minimal matching. Also, a uniform convergence theorem is proved which is needed in Karp\u27s probabilistic algorithm for the traveling salesman problem

    Approximation Algorithms for Network Design Problems

    Get PDF
    We consider different variants of network design problems. Given a set of points in the plane we search for a shortest interconnection of them. In this general formulation the problem is known as Steiner tree problem. We consider the special case of octilinear Steiner trees in the presence of hard and soft obstacles. In an octilinear Steiner tree the line segments connecting the points are allowed to run either in horizontal, vertical or diagonal direction. An obstacle is a connected region in the plane bounded by a simple polygon. No line segment of an octilinear Steiner tree is allowed to lie in the interior of a hard obstacle. If we intersect a Steiner tree with the interior of a soft obstacle, no connected component of the induced subtree is allowed to be longer than a given fixed length. We provide polynomial time approximation schemes for the octilinear Steiner tree problem in the presence of hard and soft obstacles. These were the first presented approximation schemes introduced for the problems. Additionally, we introduce a (2+epsilon)-approximation algorithm for soft obstacles. We then turn to Euclidean group Steiner trees. Instead of a set of fixed points we get for each point a set of potential locations (combined into groups) and we need to pick only one location of each group. The groups we consider lie inside disjoint regions fulfilling a special property so-called alpha-fatness. Roughly speaking, the term alpha-fat specifies the shape of the region in comparison to a disk. We give the first approximation algorithm for this problem and achieve an approximation ratio of (1+epsilon)(9.093alpha +1). Last, we consider Manhattan networks. They are allowed to contain edges only in horizontal and vertical direction. In contrast to Steiner trees they contain a shortest path between each pair of points. We introduce insights into the structure of Manhattan networks, particularly in the context of so-called staircases. We give three new approximation algorithms for the Manhattan network problem, the first with approximation ratio 3 and two algorithms with ratio 2. To this end we introduce two algorithms for the Manhattan network problem of staircases. The first algorithm solves the problem to optimality the second yields a 2-approximation. Variants of both algorithms are already known in the literature. Since we use a slightly different definition of staircases and we need special properties of them, we adopt the algorithms to our situation. The 2-approximation algorithms achieve the best known approximation ratio of an algorithm for the Manhattan network problem known so far. Last we give an idea how we could possibly find an algorithm with better approximation ratio
    corecore