47,592 research outputs found
Inquisitive bisimulation
Inquisitive modal logic InqML is a generalisation of standard Kripke-style
modal logic. In its epistemic incarnation, it extends standard epistemic logic
to capture not just the information that agents have, but also the questions
that they are interested in. Technically, InqML fits within the family of
logics based on team semantics. From a model-theoretic perspective, it takes us
a step in the direction of monadic second-order logic, as inquisitive modal
operators involve quantification over sets of worlds. We introduce and
investigate the natural notion of bisimulation equivalence in the setting of
InqML. We compare the expressiveness of InqML and first-order logic in the
context of relational structures with two sorts, one for worlds and one for
information states. We characterise inquisitive modal logic, as well as its
multi-agent epistemic S5-like variant, as the bisimulation invariant fragment
of first-order logic over various natural classes of two-sorted structures.
These results crucially require non-classical methods in studying bisimulation
and first-order expressiveness over non-elementary classes of structures,
irrespective of whether we aim for characterisations in the sense of classical
or of finite model theory
Bisimulation in Inquisitive Modal Logic
Inquisitive modal logic, InqML, is a generalisation of standard Kripke-style
modal logic. In its epistemic incarnation, it extends standard epistemic logic
to capture not just the information that agents have, but also the questions
that they are interested in. Technically, InqML fits within the family of
logics based on team semantics. From a model-theoretic perspective, it takes us
a step in the direction of monadic second-order logic, as inquisitive modal
operators involve quantification over sets of worlds. We introduce and
investigate the natural notion of bisimulation equivalence in the setting of
InqML. We compare the expressiveness of InqML and first-order logic, and
characterise inquisitive modal logic as the bisimulation invariant fragments of
first-order logic over various classes of two-sorted relational structures.
These results crucially require non-classical methods in studying bisimulations
and first-order expressiveness over non-elementary classes.Comment: In Proceedings TARK 2017, arXiv:1707.0825
Systematic Verification of the Modal Logic Cube in Isabelle/HOL
We present an automated verification of the well-known modal logic cube in
Isabelle/HOL, in which we prove the inclusion relations between the cube's
logics using automated reasoning tools. Prior work addresses this problem but
without restriction to the modal logic cube, and using encodings in first-order
logic in combination with first-order automated theorem provers. In contrast,
our solution is more elegant, transparent and effective. It employs an
embedding of quantified modal logic in classical higher-order logic. Automated
reasoning tools, such as Sledgehammer with LEO-II, Satallax and CVC4, Metis and
Nitpick, are employed to achieve full automation. Though successful, the
experiments also motivate some technical improvements in the Isabelle/HOL tool.Comment: In Proceedings PxTP 2015, arXiv:1507.0837
On the Concept of a Notational Variant
In the study of modal and nonclassical logics, translations have frequently been employed as a way of measuring the inferential capabilities of a logic. It is sometimes claimed that two logics are “notational variants” if they are translationally equivalent. However, we will show that this cannot be quite right, since first-order logic and propositional logic are translationally equivalent. Others have claimed that for two logics to be notational variants, they must at least be compositionally intertranslatable. The definition of compositionality these accounts use, however, is too strong, as the standard translation from modal logic to first-order logic is not compositional in this sense. In light of this, we will explore a weaker version of this notion that we will call schematicity and show that there is no schematic translation either from first-order logic to propositional logic or from intuitionistic logic to classical logic
Complete Additivity and Modal Incompleteness
In this paper, we tell a story about incompleteness in modal logic. The story
weaves together a paper of van Benthem, `Syntactic aspects of modal
incompleteness theorems,' and a longstanding open question: whether every
normal modal logic can be characterized by a class of completely additive modal
algebras, or as we call them, V-BAOs. Using a first-order reformulation of the
property of complete additivity, we prove that the modal logic that starred in
van Benthem's paper resolves the open question in the negative. In addition,
for the case of bimodal logic, we show that there is a naturally occurring
logic that is incomplete with respect to V-BAOs, namely the provability logic
GLB. We also show that even logics that are unsound with respect to such
algebras do not have to be more complex than the classical propositional
calculus. On the other hand, we observe that it is undecidable whether a
syntactically defined logic is V-complete. After these results, we generalize
the Blok Dichotomy to degrees of V-incompleteness. In the end, we return to van
Benthem's theme of syntactic aspects of modal incompleteness
Logical operators for ontological modeling
We show that logic has more to offer to ontologists than standard first order
and modal operators. We first describe some operators of linear logic which we
believe are particularly suitable for ontological modeling, and suggest how to interpret
them within an ontological framework. After showing how they can coexist
with those of classical logic, we analyze three notions of artifact from the literature
to conclude that these linear operators allow for reducing the ontological commitment
needed for their formalization, and even simplify their logical formulation
- …