The Measurement Calculus

Measurement-based quantum computation has emerged from the physics community as a new approach to quantum computation where the notion of measurement is the main driving force of computation. This is in contrast with the more traditional circuit model which is based on unitary operations. Among measurement-based quantum computation methods, the recently introduced one-way quantum computer stands out as fundamental. We develop a rigorous mathematical model underlying the one-way quantum computer and present a concrete syntax and operational semantics for programs, which we call patterns, and an algebra of these patterns derived from a denotational semantics. More importantly, we present a calculus for reasoning locally and compositionally about these patterns. We present a rewrite theory and prove a general standardization theorem which allows all patterns to be put in a semantically equivalent standard form. Standardization has far-reaching consequences: a new physical architecture based on performing all the entanglement in the beginning, parallelization by exposing the dependency structure of measurements and expressiveness theorems. Furthermore we formalize several other measurement-based models: Teleportation, Phase and Pauli models and present compositional embeddings of them into and from the one-way model. This allows us to transfer all the theory we develop for the one-way model to these models. This shows that the framework we have developed has a general impact on measurement-based computation and is not just particular to the one-way quantum computer.Comment: 46 pages, 2 figures, Replacement of quant-ph/0412135v1, the new version also include formalization of several other measurement-based models: Teleportation, Phase and Pauli models and present compositional embeddings of them into and from the one-way model. To appear in Journal of AC

Inferring descriptive generalisations of formal languages

In the present paper, we introduce a variant of Gold-style learners that is not required to infer precise descriptions of the languages in a class, but that must nd descriptive patterns, i. e., optimal generalisations within a class of pattern languages. Our rst main result characterises those indexed families of recursive languages that can be inferred by such learners, and we demonstrate that this characterisation shows enlightening connections to Angluin's corresponding result for exact inference. Furthermore, this result reveals that our model can be interpreted as an instance of a natural extension of Gold's model of language identi cation in the limit. Using a notion of descriptiveness that is restricted to the natural subclass of terminal-free E-pattern languages, we introduce a generic inference strategy, and our second main result characterises those classes of languages that can be generalised by this strategy. This characterisation demonstrates that there are major classes of languages that can be generalised in our model, but not be inferred by a normal Gold-style learner. Our corresponding technical considerations lead to insights of intrinsic interest into combinatorial and algorithmic properties of pattern languages

Bisimulations on data graphs

Bisimulation provides structural conditions to characterize indistinguishability from an external observer between nodes on labeled graphs. It is a fundamental notion used in many areas, such as verification, graph-structured databases, and constraint satisfaction. However, several current applications use graphs where nodes also contain data (the so called “data graphs”), and where observers can test for equality or inequality of data values (e.g., asking the attribute ‘name’ of a node to be different from that of all its neighbors). The present work constitutes a first investigation of “data aware” bisimulations on data graphs. We study the problem of computing such bisimulations, based on the observational indistinguishability for XPath —a language that extends modal logics like PDL with tests for data equality— with and without transitive closure operators. We show that in general the problem is PSPACE-complete, but identify several restrictions that yield better complexity bounds (CO- NP, PTIME) by controlling suitable parameters of the problem, namely the amount of non-locality allowed, and the class of models considered (graphs, DAGs, trees). In particular, this analysis yields a hierarchy of tractable fragments.Fil: Abriola, Sergio Alejandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Investigación En Ciencias de la Computación. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigación En Ciencias de la Computacion; ArgentinaFil: Barceló, Pablo. Universidad de Chile; ChileFil: Figueira, Diego. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; FranciaFil: Figueira, Santiago. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Investigación En Ciencias de la Computación. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigación En Ciencias de la Computacion; Argentin

Search for Program Structure

The community of programming language research loves the Curry-Howard correspondence between proofs and programs. Cut-elimination as computation, theorems for free, \u27call/cc\u27 as excluded middle, dependently typed languages as proof assistants, etc. Yet we have, for all these years, missed an obvious observation: "the structure of programs corresponds to the structure of proof search". For pure programs and intuitionistic logic, more is known about the latter than the former. We think we know what programs are, but logicians know better! To motivate the study of proof search for program structure, we retrace recent research on applying focusing to study the canonical structure of simply-typed lambda-terms. We then motivate the open problem of extending canonical forms to support richer type systems, such as polymorphism, by discussing a few enticing applications of more canonical program representations

On the k-Abelian Equivalence Relation of Finite Words

This thesis is devoted to the so-called k-abelian equivalence relation of sequences of symbols, that is, words. This equivalence relation is a generalization of the abelian equivalence of words. Two words are abelian equivalent if one is a permutation of the other. For any positive integer k, two words are called k-abelian equivalent if each word of length at most k occurs equally many times as a factor in the two words. The k-abelian equivalence defines an equivalence relation, even a congruence, of finite words. A hierarchy of equivalence classes in between the equality relation and the abelian equivalence of words is thus obtained. Most of the literature on the k-abelian equivalence deals with infinite words. In this thesis we consider several aspects of the equivalence relations, the main objective being to build a fairly comprehensive picture on the structure of the k-abelian equivalence classes themselves. The main part of the thesis deals with the structural aspects of k-abelian equivalence classes. We also consider aspects of k-abelian equivalence in infinite words. We survey known characterizations of the k-abelian equivalence of finite words from the literature and also introduce novel characterizations. For the analysis of structural properties of the equivalence relation, the main tool is the characterization by the rewriting rule called the k-switching. Using this rule it is straightforward to show that the language comprised of the lexicographically least elements of the k-abelian equivalence classes is regular. Further word-combinatorial analysis of the lexicographically least elements leads us to describe the deterministic finite automata recognizing this language. Using tools from formal language theory combined with our analysis, we give an optimal expression for the asymptotic growth rate of the number of k-abelian equivalence classes of length n over an m-letter alphabet. Explicit formulae are computed for small values of k and m, and these sequences appear in Sloane’s Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences. Due to the fact that the k-abelian equivalence relation is a congruence of the free monoid, we study equations over the k-abelian equivalence classes. The main result in this setting is that any system of equations of k-abelian equivalence classes is equivalent to one of its finite subsystems, i.e., the monoid defined by the k-abelian equivalence relation possesses the compactness property. Concerning infinite words, we mainly consider the (k-)abelian complexity function. We complete a classification of the asymptotic abelian complexities of pure morphic binary words. In other words, given a morphism which has an infinite binary fixed point, the limit superior asymptotic abelian complexity of the fixed point can be computed (in principle). We also give a new proof of the fact that the k-abelian complexity of a Sturmian word is n + 1 for length n 2k. In fact, we consider several aspects of the k-abelian equivalence relation in Sturmian words using a dynamical interpretation of these words. We reprove the fact that any Sturmian word contains arbitrarily large k-abelian repetitions. The methods used allow to analyze the situation in more detail, and this leads us to define the so-called k-abelian critical exponent which measures the ratio of the exponent and the length of the root of a k-abelian repetition. This notion is connected to a deep number theoretic object called the Lagrange spectrum

On Commutation and Conjugacy of Rational Languages and the Fixed Point Method

The research on language equations has been active during last decades. Compared to the equations on words the equations on languages are much more difficult to solve. Even very simple equations that are easy to solve for words can be very hard for languages. In this thesis we study two of such equations, namely commutation and conjugacy equations. We study these equations on some limited special cases and compare some of these results to the solutions of corresponding equations on words. For both equations we study the maximal solutions, the centralizer and the conjugator. We present a fixed point method that we can use to search these maximal solutions and analyze the reasons why this method is not successful for all languages. We give also several examples to illustrate the behaviour of this method.Siirretty Doriast

Boundary Algebra: A Simple Notation for Boolean Algebra and the Truth Functors

Boundary algebra [BA] is a simpler notation for Spencer-Brown’s (1969) primary algebra [pa], the Boolean algebra 2, and the truth functors. The primary arithmetic [PA] consists of the atoms ‘()’ and the blank page, concatenation, and enclosure between ‘(‘ and ‘)’, denoting the primitive notion of distinction. Inserting letters denoting the presence or absence of () into a PA formula yields a BA formula. The BA axioms are "()()=()" (A1), and "(()) [=?] may be written or erased at will” (A2). Repeated application of these axioms to a PA formula yields a member of B= {(),?} called its simplification. (a) has two intended interpretations: (a) ? a? (Boolean algebra 2), and (a) ? ~a (sentential logic). BA is self-dual: () ? 1 [dually 0] so that B is the carrier for 2, ab ? a?b [a?b], and (a)b [(a(b))] ? a=b, so that ?=() [()=?] follows trivially and B is a poset. The BA basis abc= bca (Dilworth 1938), a(ab)= a(b), and a()=() (Bricken 2002) facilitates clausal reasoning and proof by calculation. BA also simplifies normal forms and Quine’s (1982) truth value analysis. () ? true [false] yields boundary logic.G. Spencer Brown; boundary algebra; boundary logic; primary algebra; primary arithmetic; Boolean algebra; calculation proof; C.S. Peirce; existential graphs.