Proximal point algorithms on Hadamard manifolds: linear convergence and finite termination

In the present paper, we consider inexact proximal point algorithms for finding singular points of multivalued vector fields on Hadamard manifolds. The rate of convergence is shown to be linear under the mild assumption of metric subregularity. Furthermore, if the sequence of parameters associated with the iterative scheme converges to 0, then the convergence rate is superlinear. At the same time, the finite termination of the inexact proximal point algorithm is also provided under a weak sharp minima-like condition. Applications to optimization problems are provided. Some of our results are new even in Euclidean spaces, while others improve and/or extend some known results in Euclidean spaces. As a matter of fact, in the case of exact proximal point algorithm, our results improve the corresponding results in [G. C. Bento and J. X. Cruz Neto, Optim., 63 (2014), pp. 1281–1288]. Finally, several examples are provided to illustrate that our results are applicable while the corresponding results in the Hilbert space setting are not.National Natural Science Foundation of ChinaZhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of ChinaDirección General de Enseñanza SuperiorJunta de AndalucíaNational Science Council of Taiwa

Splitting methods with variable metric for KL functions

We study the convergence of general abstract descent methods applied to a lower semicontinuous nonconvex function f that satisfies the Kurdyka-Lojasiewicz inequality in a Hilbert space. We prove that any precompact sequence converges to a critical point of f and obtain new convergence rates both for the values and the iterates. The analysis covers alternating versions of the forward-backward method with variable metric and relative errors. As an example, a nonsmooth and nonconvex version of the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm is detailled

Activity Identification and Local Linear Convergence of Forward--Backward-type methods

In this paper, we consider a class of Forward--Backward (FB) splitting methods that includes several variants (e.g. inertial schemes, FISTA) for minimizing the sum of two proper convex and lower semi-continuous functions, one of which has a Lipschitz continuous gradient, and the other is partly smooth relatively to a smooth active manifold $\mathcal{M}$. We propose a unified framework, under which we show that, this class of FB-type algorithms (i) correctly identifies the active manifolds in a finite number of iterations (finite activity identification), and (ii) then enters a local linear convergence regime, which we characterize precisely in terms of the structure of the underlying active manifolds. For simpler problems involving polyhedral functions, we show finite termination. We also establish and explain why FISTA (with convergent sequences) locally oscillates and can be slower than FB. These results may have numerous applications including in signal/image processing, sparse recovery and machine learning. Indeed, the obtained results explain the typical behaviour that has been observed numerically for many problems in these fields such as the Lasso, the group Lasso, the fused Lasso and the nuclear norm regularization to name only a few.Comment: Full length version of the previous short on

An asymptotically superlinearly convergent semismooth Newton augmented Lagrangian method for Linear Programming

Powerful interior-point methods (IPM) based commercial solvers, such as Gurobi and Mosek, have been hugely successful in solving large-scale linear programming (LP) problems. The high efficiency of these solvers depends critically on the sparsity of the problem data and advanced matrix factorization techniques. For a large scale LP problem with data matrix $A$ that is dense (possibly structured) or whose corresponding normal matrix $AA^T$ has a dense Cholesky factor (even with re-ordering), these solvers may require excessive computational cost and/or extremely heavy memory usage in each interior-point iteration. Unfortunately, the natural remedy, i.e., the use of iterative methods based IPM solvers, although can avoid the explicit computation of the coefficient matrix and its factorization, is not practically viable due to the inherent extreme ill-conditioning of the large scale normal equation arising in each interior-point iteration. To provide a better alternative choice for solving large scale LPs with dense data or requiring expensive factorization of its normal equation, we propose a semismooth Newton based inexact proximal augmented Lagrangian ({\sc Snipal}) method. Different from classical IPMs, in each iteration of {\sc Snipal}, iterative methods can efficiently be used to solve simpler yet better conditioned semismooth Newton linear systems. Moreover, {\sc Snipal} not only enjoys a fast asymptotic superlinear convergence but is also proven to enjoy a finite termination property. Numerical comparisons with Gurobi have demonstrated encouraging potential of {\sc Snipal} for handling large-scale LP problems where the constraint matrix $A$ has a dense representation or $AA^T$ has a dense factorization even with an appropriate re-ordering.Comment: Due to the limitation "The abstract field cannot be longer than 1,920 characters", the abstract appearing here is slightly shorter than that in the PDF fil

On starting and stopping criteria for nested primal-dual iterations

The importance of an adequate inner loop starting point (as opposed to a sufficient inner loop stopping rule) is discussed in the context of a numerical optimization algorithm consisting of nested primal-dual proximal-gradient iterations. While the number of inner iterations is fixed in advance, convergence of the whole algorithm is still guaranteed by virtue of a warm-start strategy for the inner loop, showing that inner loop "starting rules" can be just as effective as "stopping rules" for guaranteeing convergence. The algorithm itself is applicable to the numerical solution of convex optimization problems defined by the sum of a differentiable term and two possibly non-differentiable terms. One of the latter terms should take the form of the composition of a linear map and a proximable function, while the differentiable term needs an accessible gradient. The algorithm reduces to the classical proximal gradient algorithm in certain special cases and it also generalizes other existing algorithms. In addition, under some conditions of strong convexity, we show a linear rate of convergence.Comment: 18 pages, no figure