Using Description Logics for RDF Constraint Checking and Closed-World Recognition

RDF and Description Logics work in an open-world setting where absence of information is not information about absence. Nevertheless, Description Logic axioms can be interpreted in a closed-world setting and in this setting they can be used for both constraint checking and closed-world recognition against information sources. When the information sources are expressed in well-behaved RDF or RDFS (i.e., RDF graphs interpreted in the RDF or RDFS semantics) this constraint checking and closed-world recognition is simple to describe. Further this constraint checking can be implemented as SPARQL querying and thus effectively performed.Comment: Extended version of a paper of the same name that will appear in AAAI-201

Local Type Checking for Linked Data Consumers

The Web of Linked Data is the cumulation of over a decade of work by the Web standards community in their effort to make data more Web-like. We provide an introduction to the Web of Linked Data from the perspective of a Web developer that would like to build an application using Linked Data. We identify a weakness in the development stack as being a lack of domain specific scripting languages for designing background processes that consume Linked Data. To address this weakness, we design a scripting language with a simple but appropriate type system. In our proposed architecture some data is consumed from sources outside of the control of the system and some data is held locally. Stronger type assumptions can be made about the local data than external data, hence our type system mixes static and dynamic typing. Throughout, we relate our work to the W3C recommendations that drive Linked Data, so our syntax is accessible to Web developers.Comment: In Proceedings WWV 2013, arXiv:1308.026

Semantics and Validation of Shapes Schemas for RDF

We present a formal semantics and proof of soundness for shapes schemas, an expressive schema language for RDF graphs that is the foundation of Shape Expressions Language 2.0. It can be used to describe the vocabulary and the structure of an RDF graph, and to constrain the admissible properties and values for nodes in that graph. The language defines a typing mechanism called shapes against which nodes of the graph can be checked. It includes an algebraic grouping operator, a choice operator and cardinality constraints for the number of allowed occurrences of a property. Shapes can be combined using Boolean operators, and can use possibly recursive references to other shapes. We describe the syntax of the language and define its semantics. The semantics is proven to be well-defined for schemas that satisfy a reasonable syntactic restriction, namely stratified use of negation and recursion. We present two algorithms for the validation of an RDF graph against a shapes schema. The first algorithm is a direct implementation of the semantics, whereas the second is a non-trivial improvement. We also briefly give implementation guidelines

Semantic Web Datatype Inference: Towards Better RDF Matching

International audienceIn the context of RDF document matching/integration, the datatype information, which is related to literal objects, is an important aspect to be analyzed in order to better determine similar RDF documents. In this paper, we propose a datatype inference process based on four steps: (i) predicate information analysis (i.e., deduce the datatype from existing range property); (ii) analysis of the object value itself by a pattern-matching process (i.e., recognize the object lexical-space); (iii) semantic analysis of the predicate name and its context; and (iv) generalization of numeric and binary datatypes to ensure the integration. We evaluated the performance and the accuracy of our approach with datasets from DBpedia. Results show that the execution time of the inference process is linear and its accuracy can increase up to 97.10%. \textcopyright 2017, Springer International Publishing AG

Construction of RDF(S) from UML Class Diagrams

RDF (Resource Description Framework) and RDF Schema (collectively called RDF(S)) are the normative language to describe the Web resource information. How to construct RDF(S) from the existing data sources is becoming an important research issue. In particular, UML (Unified Modeling Language) is being widely applied to data modeling in many application domains, and how to construct RDF(S) from the existing UML models becomes an important issue to be solved in the context of Semantic Web. By comparing and analyzing the characteristics of UML and RDF(S), this paper proposes an approach for constructing RDF(S) from UML and implements a prototype construction tool. First, we give the formal definitions of UML and RDF(S). After that, a construction approach from UML to RDF(S) is proposed, a construction example is provided, and the analyses and discussions about the approach are done. Further, based on the proposed approach, a prototype construction tool is implemented, and the experiment shows that the approach and the tool are feasible

A Typed Model for Linked Data

The term Linked Data is used to describe ubiquitous and emerging semi-structured data formats on the Web. URIs in Linked Data allow diverse data sources to link to each other, forming a Web of Data. A calculus which models concurrent queries and updates over Linked Data is presented. The calculus exhibits operations essential for declaring rich atomic actions. The operations recover emergent structure in the loosely structured Web of Data. The calculus is executable due to its operational semantics. A light type system ensures that URIs with a distinguished role are used consistently. The main theorem verifies that the light type system and operational semantics work at the same level of granularity, so are compatible. Examples show that a range of existing and emerging standards are captured. Data formats include RDF, named graphs and feeds. The primitives of the calculus model SPARQL Query and the Atom Publishing Protocol. The subtype system is based on RDFS, which improves interoperability. Examples focuss on the SPARQL Update proposal for which a fine grained operational semantics is developed. Further potential high level languages are outlined for exploiting Linked Data

Functorial Data Migration

In this paper we present a simple database definition language: that of categories and functors. A database schema is a small category and an instance is a set-valued functor on it. We show that morphisms of schemas induce three "data migration functors", which translate instances from one schema to the other in canonical ways. These functors parameterize projections, unions, and joins over all tables simultaneously and can be used in place of conjunctive and disjunctive queries. We also show how to connect a database and a functional programming language by introducing a functorial connection between the schema and the category of types for that language. We begin the paper with a multitude of examples to motivate the definitions, and near the end we provide a dictionary whereby one can translate database concepts into category-theoretic concepts and vice-versa.Comment: 30 page