Fingerprints in Compressed Strings

The Karp-Rabin fingerprint of a string is a type of hash value that due to its strong properties has been used in many string algorithms. In this paper we show how to construct a data structure for a string S of size N compressed by a context-free grammar of size n that answers fingerprint queries. That is, given indices i and j, the answer to a query is the fingerprint of the substring S[i,j]. We present the first O(n) space data structures that answer fingerprint queries without decompressing any characters. For Straight Line Programs (SLP) we get O(logN) query time, and for Linear SLPs (an SLP derivative that captures LZ78 compression and its variations) we get O(log log N) query time. Hence, our data structures has the same time and space complexity as for random access in SLPs. We utilize the fingerprint data structures to solve the longest common extension problem in query time O(log N log l) and O(log l log log l + log log N) for SLPs and Linear SLPs, respectively. Here, l denotes the length of the LCE

Fingerprints in compressed strings

Abstract. The Karp-Rabin fingerprint of a string is a type of hash value that due to its strong properties has been used in many string algorithms. In this paper we show how to construct a data structure for a string S of size N compressed by a context-free grammar of size n that answers fingerprint queries. That is, given indices i and j, the answer to a query is the fingerprint of the substring S[i, j]. We present the first O(n) space data structures that answer fingerprint queries without decompressing any characters. For Straight Line Programs (SLP) we get O(logN) query time, and for Linear SLPs (an SLP derivative that captures LZ78 compression and its variations) we get O(log logN) query time. Hence, our data structures has the same time and space complexity as for random access in SLPs. We utilize the fingerprint data structures to solve the longest common extension problem in query time O(logN log `) and O(log ` log log `+ log logN) for SLPs and Linear SLPs, respectively. Here, ` denotes the length of the LCE.

Universal Compressed Text Indexing

The rise of repetitive datasets has lately generated a lot of interest in compressed self-indexes based on dictionary compression, a rich and heterogeneous family that exploits text repetitions in different ways. For each such compression scheme, several different indexing solutions have been proposed in the last two decades. To date, the fastest indexes for repetitive texts are based on the run-length compressed Burrows-Wheeler transform and on the Compact Directed Acyclic Word Graph. The most space-efficient indexes, on the other hand, are based on the Lempel-Ziv parsing and on grammar compression. Indexes for more universal schemes such as collage systems and macro schemes have not yet been proposed. Very recently, Kempa and Prezza [STOC 2018] showed that all dictionary compressors can be interpreted as approximation algorithms for the smallest string attractor, that is, a set of text positions capturing all distinct substrings. Starting from this observation, in this paper we develop the first universal compressed self-index, that is, the first indexing data structure based on string attractors, which can therefore be built on top of any dictionary-compressed text representation. Let $\gamma$ be the size of a string attractor for a text of length $n$. Our index takes $O(\gamma\log(n/\gamma))$ words of space and supports locating the $occ$ occurrences of any pattern of length $m$ in $O(m\log n + occ\log^{\epsilon}n)$ time, for any constant $\epsilon>0$. This is, in particular, the first index for general macro schemes and collage systems. Our result shows that the relation between indexing and compression is much deeper than what was previously thought: the simple property standing at the core of all dictionary compressors is sufficient to support fast indexed queries.Comment: Fixed with reviewer's comment

Pattern matching in Lempel-Ziv compressed strings: fast, simple, and deterministic

Countless variants of the Lempel-Ziv compression are widely used in many real-life applications. This paper is concerned with a natural modification of the classical pattern matching problem inspired by the popularity of such compression methods: given an uncompressed pattern s[1..m] and a Lempel-Ziv representation of a string t[1..N], does s occur in t? Farach and Thorup gave a randomized O(nlog^2(N/n)+m) time solution for this problem, where n is the size of the compressed representation of t. We improve their result by developing a faster and fully deterministic O(nlog(N/n)+m) time algorithm with the same space complexity. Note that for highly compressible texts, log(N/n) might be of order n, so for such inputs the improvement is very significant. A (tiny) fragment of our method can be used to give an asymptotically optimal solution for the substring hashing problem considered by Farach and Muthukrishnan.Comment: submitte