416 research outputs found
Parameterized Complexity Dichotomy for Steiner Multicut
The Steiner Multicut problem asks, given an undirected graph G, terminals
sets T1,...,Tt V(G) of size at most p, and an integer k, whether
there is a set S of at most k edges or nodes s.t. of each set Ti at least one
pair of terminals is in different connected components of G \ S. This problem
generalizes several graph cut problems, in particular the Multicut problem (the
case p = 2), which is fixed-parameter tractable for the parameter k [Marx and
Razgon, Bousquet et al., STOC 2011].
We provide a dichotomy of the parameterized complexity of Steiner Multicut.
That is, for any combination of k, t, p, and the treewidth tw(G) as constant,
parameter, or unbounded, and for all versions of the problem (edge deletion and
node deletion with and without deletable terminals), we prove either that the
problem is fixed-parameter tractable or that the problem is hard (W[1]-hard or
even (para-)NP-complete). We highlight that:
- The edge deletion version of Steiner Multicut is fixed-parameter tractable
for the parameter k+t on general graphs (but has no polynomial kernel, even on
trees). We present two proofs: one using the randomized contractions technique
of Chitnis et al, and one relying on new structural lemmas that decompose the
Steiner cut into important separators and minimal s-t cuts.
- In contrast, both node deletion versions of Steiner Multicut are W[1]-hard
for the parameter k+t on general graphs.
- All versions of Steiner Multicut are W[1]-hard for the parameter k, even
when p=3 and the graph is a tree plus one node. Hence, the results of Marx and
Razgon, and Bousquet et al. do not generalize to Steiner Multicut.
Since we allow k, t, p, and tw(G) to be any constants, our characterization
includes a dichotomy for Steiner Multicut on trees (for tw(G) = 1), and a
polynomial time versus NP-hardness dichotomy (by restricting k,t,p,tw(G) to
constant or unbounded).Comment: As submitted to journal. This version also adds a proof of
fixed-parameter tractability for parameter k+t using the technique of
randomized contraction
Structural Rounding: Approximation Algorithms for Graphs Near an Algorithmically Tractable Class
We develop a framework for generalizing approximation algorithms from the structural graph algorithm literature so that they apply to graphs somewhat close to that class (a scenario we expect is common when working with real-world networks) while still guaranteeing approximation ratios. The idea is to edit a given graph via vertex- or edge-deletions to put the graph into an algorithmically tractable class, apply known approximation algorithms for that class, and then lift the solution to apply to the original graph. We give a general characterization of when an optimization problem is amenable to this approach, and show that it includes many well-studied graph problems, such as Independent Set, Vertex Cover, Feedback Vertex Set, Minimum Maximal Matching, Chromatic Number, (l-)Dominating Set, Edge (l-)Dominating Set, and Connected Dominating Set.
To enable this framework, we develop new editing algorithms that find the approximately-fewest edits required to bring a given graph into one of a few important graph classes (in some cases these are bicriteria algorithms which simultaneously approximate both the number of editing operations and the target parameter of the family). For bounded degeneracy, we obtain an O(r log{n})-approximation and a bicriteria (4,4)-approximation which also extends to a smoother bicriteria trade-off. For bounded treewidth, we obtain a bicriteria (O(log^{1.5} n), O(sqrt{log w}))-approximation, and for bounded pathwidth, we obtain a bicriteria (O(log^{1.5} n), O(sqrt{log w} * log n))-approximation. For treedepth 2 (related to bounded expansion), we obtain a 4-approximation. We also prove complementary hardness-of-approximation results assuming P != NP: in particular, these problems are all log-factor inapproximable, except the last which is not approximable below some constant factor 2 (assuming UGC)
The Parameterized Complexity of the Minimum Shared Edges Problem
We study the NP-complete Minimum Shared Edges (MSE) problem. Given an
undirected graph, a source and a sink vertex, and two integers p and k, the
question is whether there are p paths in the graph connecting the source with
the sink and sharing at most k edges. Herein, an edge is shared if it appears
in at least two paths. We show that MSE is W[1]-hard when parameterized by the
treewidth of the input graph and the number k of shared edges combined. We show
that MSE is fixed-parameter tractable with respect to p, but does not admit a
polynomial-size kernel (unless NP is contained in coNP/poly). In the proof of
the fixed-parameter tractability of MSE parameterized by p, we employ the
treewidth reduction technique due to Marx, O'Sullivan, and Razgon [ACM TALG
2013].Comment: 35 pages, 16 figure
Covering Small Independent Sets and Separators with Applications to Parameterized Algorithms
We present two new combinatorial tools for the design of parameterized
algorithms. The first is a simple linear time randomized algorithm that given
as input a -degenerate graph and an integer , outputs an independent
set , such that for every independent set in of size at most ,
the probability that is a subset of is at least .The second is a new (deterministic) polynomial
time graph sparsification procedure that given a graph , a set of terminal pairs and an
integer , returns an induced subgraph of that maintains all
the inclusion minimal multicuts of of size at most , and does not
contain any -vertex connected set of size . In
particular, excludes a clique of size as a
topological minor. Put together, our new tools yield new randomized fixed
parameter tractable (FPT) algorithms for Stable - Separator, Stable Odd
Cycle Transversal and Stable Multicut on general graphs, and for Stable
Directed Feedback Vertex Set on -degenerate graphs, resolving two problems
left open by Marx et al. [ACM Transactions on Algorithms, 2013]. All of our
algorithms can be derandomized at the cost of a small overhead in the running
time.Comment: 35 page
Fixed-parameter tractable canonization and isomorphism test for graphs of bounded treewidth
We give a fixed-parameter tractable algorithm that, given a parameter and
two graphs , either concludes that one of these graphs has treewidth
at least , or determines whether and are isomorphic. The running
time of the algorithm on an -vertex graph is ,
and this is the first fixed-parameter algorithm for Graph Isomorphism
parameterized by treewidth.
Our algorithm in fact solves the more general canonization problem. We namely
design a procedure working in time that, for a
given graph on vertices, either concludes that the treewidth of is
at least , or: * finds in an isomorphic-invariant way a graph
that is isomorphic to ; * finds an isomorphism-invariant
construction term --- an algebraic expression that encodes together with a
tree decomposition of of width .
Hence, the isomorphism test reduces to verifying whether the computed
isomorphic copies or the construction terms for and are equal.Comment: Full version of a paper presented at FOCS 201
- …