Online Deception Detection Refueled by Real World Data Collection

The lack of large realistic datasets presents a bottleneck in online deception detection studies. In this paper, we apply a data collection method based on social network analysis to quickly identify high-quality deceptive and truthful online reviews from Amazon. The dataset contains more than 10,000 deceptive reviews and is diverse in product domains and reviewers. Using this dataset, we explore effective general features for online deception detection that perform well across domains. We demonstrate that with generalized features - advertising speak and writing complexity scores - deception detection performance can be further improved by adding additional deceptive reviews from assorted domains in training. Finally, reviewer level evaluation gives an interesting insight into different deceptive reviewers' writing styles.Comment: 10 pages, Accepted to Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP) 201

Detection of opinion spam with character n-grams

The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18117-2_21In this paper we consider the detection of opinion spam as a stylistic classi cation task because, given a particular domain, the deceptive and truthful opinions are similar in content but di ffer in the way opinions are written (style). Particularly, we propose using character ngrams as features since they have shown to capture lexical content as well as stylistic information. We evaluated our approach on a standard corpus composed of 1600 hotel reviews, considering positive and negative reviews. We compared the results obtained with character n-grams against the ones with word n-grams. Moreover, we evaluated the e ffectiveness of character n-grams decreasing the training set size in order to simulate real training conditions. The results obtained show that character n-grams are good features for the detection of opinion spam; they seem to be able to capture better than word n-grams the content of deceptive opinions and the writing style of the deceiver. In particular, results show an improvement of 2:3% and 2:1% over the word-based representations in the detection of positive and negative deceptive opinions respectively. Furthermore, character n-grams allow to obtain a good performance also with a very small training corpus. Using only 25% of the training set, a Na ve Bayes classi er showed F1 values up to 0.80 for both opinion polarities.This work is the result of the collaboration in the frame-work of the WIQEI IRSES project (Grant No. 269180) within the FP7 Marie Curie. The second author was partially supported by the LACCIR programme under project ID R1212LAC006. Accordingly, the work of the third author was in the framework the DIANA-APPLICATIONS-Finding Hidden Knowledge inTexts: Applications (TIN2012-38603-C02-01) project, and the VLC/CAMPUS Microcluster on Multimodal Interaction in Intelligent Systems.Hernández Fusilier, D.; Montes Gomez, M.; Rosso, P.; Guzmán Cabrera, R. (2015). Detection of opinion spam with character n-grams. En Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing: 16th International Conference, CICLing 2015, Cairo, Egypt, April 14-20, 2015, Proceedings, Part II. Springer International Publishing. 285-294. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18117-2_21S285294Blamey, B., Crick, T., Oatley, G.: RU:-) or:-(? character-vs. word-gram feature selection for sentiment classification of OSN corpora. Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXIX, 207–212 (2012)Drucker, H., Wu, D., Vapnik, V.N.: Support Vector Machines for Spam Categorization. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 10(5), 1048–1054 (2002)Feng, S., Banerjee, R., Choi, Y.: Syntactic Stylometry for Deception Detection. Association for Computational Linguistics, short paper. ACL (2012)Feng, S., Xing, L., Gogar, A., Choi, Y.: Distributional Footprints of Deceptive Product Reviews. In: Proceedings of the 2012 International AAAI Conference on WebBlogs and Social Media (June 2012)Gyongyi, Z., Garcia-Molina, H., Pedersen, J.: Combating Web Spam with Trust Rank. In: Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, vol. 30, pp. 576–587. VLDB Endowment (2004)Hall, M., Eibe, F., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., Witten, I.: The WEKA Data Mining Software: an Update. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 10–18 (2009)Hernández-Fusilier, D., Guzmán-Cabrera, R., Montes-y-Gómez, M., Rosso, P.: Using PU-learning to Detect Deceptive Opinion Spam. In: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment and Social Media Analysis for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, pp. 38–45 (2013)Hernández-Fusilier, D., Montes-y-Gómez, M., Rosso, P., Guzmán-Cabrera, R.: Detecting Positive and Negative Deceptive Opinions using PU-learning. Information Processing & Management (2014), doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2014.11.001Jindal, N., Liu, B.: Opinion Spam and Analysis. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Search and Web Data Mining, pp. 219–230 (2008)Jindal, N., Liu, B., Lim, E.: Finding Unusual Review Patterns Using Unexpected Rules. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM 2010, pp. 210–220(October 2010)Kanaris, I., Kanaris, K., Houvardas, I., Stamatatos, E.: Word versus character n-grams for anti-spam filtering. International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools 16(6), 1047–1067 (2007)Lim, E.P., Nguyen, V.A., Jindal, N., Liu, B., Lauw, H.W.: Detecting Product Review Spammers Using Rating Behaviours. In: CIKM, pp. 939–948 (2010)Liu, B.: Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining. Synthesis Lecture on Human Language Technologies. Morgan & Claypool Publishers (2012)Mukherjee, A., Liu, B., Wang, J., Glance, N., Jindal, N.: Detecting Group Review Spam. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, pp. 93–94 (2011)Ntoulas, A., Najork, M., Manasse, M., Fetterly, D.: Detecting Spam Web Pages through Content Analysis. Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS), 83–92 (2006)Ott, M., Choi, Y., Cardie, C., Hancock, J.T.: Finding Deceptive Opinion Spam by any Stretch of the Imagination. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Portland, Oregon, USA, pp. 309–319 (2011)Ott, M., Cardie, C., Hancock, J.T.: Negative Deceptive Opinion Spam. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, pp. 309–319 (2013)Raymond, Y.K., Lau, S.Y., Liao, R., Chi-Wai, K., Kaiquan, X., Yunqing, X., Yuefeng, L.: Text Mining and Probabilistic Modeling for Online Review Spam Detection. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems 2(4), Article: 25, 1–30 (2011)Stamatatos, E.: On the robustness of authorship attribution based on character n-gram features. Journal of Law & Policy 21(2) (2013)Wu, G., Greene, D., Cunningham, P.: Merging Multiple Criteria to Identify Suspicious Reviews. In: RecSys 2010, pp. 241–244 (2010)Xie, S., Wang, G., Lin, S., Yu, P.S.: Review Spam Detection via Time Series Pattern Discovery. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, pp. 635–636 (2012)Zhou, L., Sh, Y., Zhang, D.: A Statistical Language Modeling Approach to Online Deception Detection. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 20(8), 1077–1081 (2008

SURVEY ON REVIEW SPAM DETECTION

The proliferation of E-commerce sites has made web an excellent source of gathering customer reviews about products; as there is no quality control anyone one can write anything which leads to review spam. This paper previews and reviews the substantial research on Review Spam detection technique. Further it provides state of art depicting some previous attempt to study review spam detection

Detecting Singleton Review Spammers Using Semantic Similarity

Online reviews have increasingly become a very important resource for consumers when making purchases. Though it is becoming more and more difficult for people to make well-informed buying decisions without being deceived by fake reviews. Prior works on the opinion spam problem mostly considered classifying fake reviews using behavioral user patterns. They focused on prolific users who write more than a couple of reviews, discarding one-time reviewers. The number of singleton reviewers however is expected to be high for many review websites. While behavioral patterns are effective when dealing with elite users, for one-time reviewers, the review text needs to be exploited. In this paper we tackle the problem of detecting fake reviews written by the same person using multiple names, posting each review under a different name. We propose two methods to detect similar reviews and show the results generally outperform the vectorial similarity measures used in prior works. The first method extends the semantic similarity between words to the reviews level. The second method is based on topic modeling and exploits the similarity of the reviews topic distributions using two models: bag-of-words and bag-of-opinion-phrases. The experiments were conducted on reviews from three different datasets: Yelp (57K reviews), Trustpilot (9K reviews) and Ott dataset (800 reviews).Comment: 6 pages, WWW 201

Machine learning-based Naive Bayes approach for divulgence of Spam Comment in Youtube station

In the 21st Century, web-based media assumes an indispensable part in the interaction and communication of civilization. As an illustration of web-based media viz. YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, etc., can increase the social regard of a person just as a gathering. Yet, every innovation has its pros as well as cons. In some YouTube channels, a machine-made spam remark is produced on that recordings, moreover, a few phony clients additionally remark a spam comment which creates an adverse effect on that YouTube channel.  The spam remarks can be distinguished by using AI (artificial intelligence) which is based on different Algorithms namely Naive Bayes, SVM, Random Forest, ANN, etc. The present investigation is focussed on a machine learning-based Naive Bayes classifier ordered methodology for the identification of spam remarks on YouTub