Parsing Argumentation Structures in Persuasive Essays

In this article, we present a novel approach for parsing argumentation structures. We identify argument components using sequence labeling at the token level and apply a new joint model for detecting argumentation structures. The proposed model globally optimizes argument component types and argumentative relations using integer linear programming. We show that our model considerably improves the performance of base classifiers and significantly outperforms challenging heuristic baselines. Moreover, we introduce a novel corpus of persuasive essays annotated with argumentation structures. We show that our annotation scheme and annotation guidelines successfully guide human annotators to substantial agreement. This corpus and the annotation guidelines are freely available for ensuring reproducibility and to encourage future research in computational argumentation.Comment: Under review in Computational Linguistics. First submission: 26 October 2015. Revised submission: 15 July 201

A PDTB-Styled End-to-End Discourse Parser

We have developed a full discourse parser in the Penn Discourse Treebank (PDTB) style. Our trained parser first identifies all discourse and non-discourse relations, locates and labels their arguments, and then classifies their relation types. When appropriate, the attribution spans to these relations are also determined. We present a comprehensive evaluation from both component-wise and error-cascading perspectives.Comment: 15 pages, 5 figures, 7 table

Cross-lingual Argumentation Mining: Machine Translation (and a bit of Projection) is All You Need!

Argumentation mining (AM) requires the identification of complex discourse structures and has lately been applied with success monolingually. In this work, we show that the existing resources are, however, not adequate for assessing cross-lingual AM, due to their heterogeneity or lack of complexity. We therefore create suitable parallel corpora by (human and machine) translating a popular AM dataset consisting of persuasive student essays into German, French, Spanish, and Chinese. We then compare (i) annotation projection and (ii) bilingual word embeddings based direct transfer strategies for cross-lingual AM, finding that the former performs considerably better and almost eliminates the loss from cross-lingual transfer. Moreover, we find that annotation projection works equally well when using either costly human or cheap machine translations. Our code and data are available at \url{http://github.com/UKPLab/coling2018-xling_argument_mining}.Comment: Accepted at Coling 201

Supervision distante pour l'apprentissage de structures discursives dans les conversations multi-locuteurs

L'objectif principal de cette thèse est d'améliorer l'inférence automatique pour la modélisation et la compréhension des communications humaines. En particulier, le but est de faciliter considérablement l'analyse du discours afin d'implémenter, au niveau industriel, des outils d'aide à l'exploration des conversations. Il s'agit notamment de la production de résumés automatiques, de recommandations, de la détection des actes de dialogue, de l'identification des décisions, de la planification et des relations sémantiques entre les actes de dialogue afin de comprendre les dialogues. Dans les conversations à plusieurs locuteurs, il est important de comprendre non seulement le sens de l'énoncé d'un locuteur et à qui il s'adresse, mais aussi les relations sémantiques qui le lient aux autres énoncés de la conversation et qui donnent lieu à différents fils de discussion. Une réponse doit être reconnue comme une réponse à une question particulière ; un argument, comme un argument pour ou contre une proposition en cours de discussion ; un désaccord, comme l'expression d'un point de vue contrasté par rapport à une autre idée déjà exprimée. Malheureusement, les données de discours annotées à la main et de qualités sont coûteuses et prennent du temps, et nous sommes loin d'en avoir assez pour entraîner des modèles d'apprentissage automatique traditionnels, et encore moins des modèles d'apprentissage profond. Il est donc nécessaire de trouver un moyen plus efficace d'annoter en structures discursives de grands corpus de conversations multi-locuteurs, tels que les transcriptions de réunions ou les chats. Un autre problème est qu'aucune quantité de données ne sera suffisante pour permettre aux modèles d'apprentissage automatique d'apprendre les caractéristiques sémantiques des relations discursives sans l'aide d'un expert ; les données sont tout simplement trop rares. Les relations de longue distance, dans lesquelles un énoncé est sémantiquement connecté non pas à l'énoncé qui le précède immédiatement, mais à un autre énoncé plus antérieur/tôt dans la conversation, sont particulièrement difficiles et rares, bien que souvent centrales pour la compréhension. Notre objectif dans cette thèse a donc été non seulement de concevoir un modèle qui prédit la structure du discours pour une conversation multipartite sans nécessiter de grandes quantités de données annotées manuellement, mais aussi de développer une approche qui soit transparente et explicable afin qu'elle puisse être modifiée et améliorée par des experts.The main objective of this thesis is to improve the automatic capture of semantic information with the goal of modeling and understanding human communication. We have advanced the state of the art in discourse parsing, in particular in the retrieval of discourse structure from chat, in order to implement, at the industrial level, tools to help explore conversations. These include the production of automatic summaries, recommendations, dialogue acts detection, identification of decisions, planning and semantic relations between dialogue acts in order to understand dialogues. In multi-party conversations it is important to not only understand the meaning of a participant's utterance and to whom it is addressed, but also the semantic relations that tie it to other utterances in the conversation and give rise to different conversation threads. An answer must be recognized as an answer to a particular question; an argument, as an argument for or against a proposal under discussion; a disagreement, as the expression of a point of view contrasted with another idea already expressed. Unfortunately, capturing such information using traditional supervised machine learning methods from quality hand-annotated discourse data is costly and time-consuming, and we do not have nearly enough data to train these machine learning models, much less deep learning models. Another problem is that arguably, no amount of data will be sufficient for machine learning models to learn the semantic characteristics of discourse relations without some expert guidance; the data are simply too sparse. Long distance relations, in which an utterance is semantically connected not to the immediately preceding utterance, but to another utterance from further back in the conversation, are particularly difficult and rare, though often central to comprehension. It is therefore necessary to find a more efficient way to retrieve discourse structures from large corpora of multi-party conversations, such as meeting transcripts or chats. This is one goal this thesis achieves. In addition, we not only wanted to design a model that predicts discourse structure for multi-party conversation without requiring large amounts of hand-annotated data, but also to develop an approach that is transparent and explainable so that it can be modified and improved by experts. The method detailed in this thesis achieves this goal as well