Quasicrystals, model sets, and automatic sequences

We survey mathematical properties of quasicrystals, first from the point of view of harmonic analysis, then from the point of view of morphic and automatic sequences. Nous proposons un tour d'horizon de propri\'et\'es math\'ematiques des quasicristaux, d'abord du point de vue de l'analyse harmonique, ensuite du point de vue des suites morphiques et automatiques

Occurrences of palindromes in characteristic Sturmian words

This paper is concerned with palindromes occurring in characteristic Sturmian words $c_\alpha$ of slope $\alpha$, where $\alpha \in (0,1)$ is an irrational. As $c_\alpha$ is a uniformly recurrent infinite word, any (palindromic) factor of $c_\alpha$ occurs infinitely many times in $c_\alpha$ with bounded gaps. Our aim is to completely describe where palindromes occur in $c_\alpha$. In particular, given any palindromic factor $u$ of $c_\alpha$, we shall establish a decomposition of $c_\alpha$ with respect to the occurrences of $u$. Such a decomposition shows precisely where $u$ occurs in $c_\alpha$, and this is directly related to the continued fraction expansion of $\alpha$.Comment: 17 page

A characterization of fine words over a finite alphabet

To any infinite word w over a finite alphabet A we can associate two infinite words min(w) and max(w) such that any prefix of min(w) (resp. max(w)) is the lexicographically smallest (resp. greatest) amongst the factors of w of the same length. We say that an infinite word w over A is "fine" if there exists an infinite word u such that, for any lexicographic order, min(w) = au where a = min(A). In this paper, we characterize fine words; specifically, we prove that an infinite word w is fine if and only if w is either a "strict episturmian word" or a strict "skew episturmian word''. This characterization generalizes a recent result of G. Pirillo, who proved that a fine word over a 2-letter alphabet is either an (aperiodic) Sturmian word, or an ultimately periodic (but not periodic) infinite word, all of whose factors are (finite) Sturmian.Comment: 16 pages; presented at the conference on "Combinatorics, Automata and Number Theory", Liege, Belgium, May 8-19, 2006 (to appear in a special issue of Theoretical Computer Science

Canonical Representatives of Morphic Permutations

An infinite permutation can be defined as a linear ordering of the set of natural numbers. In particular, an infinite permutation can be constructed with an aperiodic infinite word over $\{0,\ldots,q-1\}$ as the lexicographic order of the shifts of the word. In this paper, we discuss the question if an infinite permutation defined this way admits a canonical representative, that is, can be defined by a sequence of numbers from [0, 1], such that the frequency of its elements in any interval is equal to the length of that interval. We show that a canonical representative exists if and only if the word is uniquely ergodic, and that is why we use the term ergodic permutations. We also discuss ways to construct the canonical representative of a permutation defined by a morphic word and generalize the construction of Makarov, 2009, for the Thue-Morse permutation to a wider class of infinite words.Comment: Springer. WORDS 2015, Sep 2015, Kiel, Germany. Combinatorics on Words: 10th International Conference. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1503.0618

Extremal properties of (epi)Sturmian sequences and distribution modulo 1

Starting from a study of Y. Bugeaud and A. Dubickas (2005) on a question in distribution of real numbers modulo 1 via combinatorics on words, we survey some combinatorial properties of (epi)Sturmian sequences and distribution modulo 1 in connection to their work. In particular we focus on extremal properties of (epi)Sturmian sequences, some of which have been rediscovered several times

Characterization of infinite LSP words and endomorphisms preserving the LSP property

Answering a question of G. Fici, we give an $S$-adic characterization of thefamily of infinite LSP words, that is, the family of infinite words having all their left special factors as prefixes.More precisely we provide a finite set of morphisms $S$ and an automaton ${\cal A}$ such that an infinite word is LSP if and only if it is $S$-adic and one of its directive words is recognizable by ${\cal A}$.Then we characterize the endomorphisms that preserve the property of being LSP for infinite words.This allows us to prove that there exists no set $S'$ of endomorphisms for which the set of infinite LSP words corresponds to the set of $S'$-adic words. This implies that an automaton is required no matter which set of morphisms is used.Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1705.0578