Brain-Switches for Asynchronous Brain−Computer Interfaces: A Systematic Review

A brain–computer interface (BCI) has been extensively studied to develop a novel communication system for disabled people using their brain activities. An asynchronous BCI system is more realistic and practical than a synchronous BCI system, in that, BCI commands can be generated whenever the user wants. However, the relatively low performance of an asynchronous BCI system is problematic because redundant BCI commands are required to correct false-positive operations. To significantly reduce the number of false-positive operations of an asynchronous BCI system, a two-step approach has been proposed using a brain-switch that first determines whether the user wants to use an asynchronous BCI system before the operation of the asynchronous BCI system. This study presents a systematic review of the state-of-the-art brain-switch techniques and future research directions. To this end, we reviewed brain-switch research articles published from 2000 to 2019 in terms of their (a) neuroimaging modality, (b) paradigm, (c) operation algorithm, and (d) performance

Integrating EEG and MEG signals to improve motor imagery classification in brain-computer interfaces

We propose a fusion approach that combines features from simultaneously recorded electroencephalographic (EEG) and magnetoencephalographic (MEG) signals to improve classification performances in motor imagery-based brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). We applied our approach to a group of 15 healthy subjects and found a significant classification performance enhancement as compared to standard single-modality approaches in the alpha and beta bands. Taken together, our findings demonstrate the advantage of considering multimodal approaches as complementary tools for improving the impact of non-invasive BCIs

Brain-Computer Interface: comparison of two control modes to drive a virtual robot

A Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) is a system that enables communication and control that is not based on muscular movements, but on brain activity. Some of these systems are based on discrimination of different mental tasks; usually they match the number of mental tasks to the number of control commands. Previous research at the University of Málaga (UMA-BCI) have proposed a BCI system to freely control an external device, letting the subjects choose among several navigation commands using only one active mental task (versus any other mental activity). Although the navigation paradigm proposed in this system has been proved useful for continuous movements, if the user wants to move medium or large distances, he/she needs to keep the effort of the MI task in order to keep the command. In this way, the aim of this work was to test a navigation paradigm based on the brain-switch mode for ‘forward’ command. In this mode, the subjects used the mental task to switch their state on /off: they stopped if they were moving forward and vice versa. Initially, twelve healthy and untrained subjects participated in this study, but due to a lack of control in previous session, only four subjects participated in the experiment, in which they had to control a virtual robot using two paradigms: one based on continuous mode and another based on switch mode. Preliminary results show that both paradigms can be used to navigate through virtual environments, although with the first one the times needed to complete a path were notably lower.Universidad de Málaga. Campus de Excelencia Internacional Andalucía Tech

Assessing the quality of steady-state visual-evoked potentials for moving humans using a mobile electroencephalogram headset.

Recent advances in mobile electroencephalogram (EEG) systems, featuring non-prep dry electrodes and wireless telemetry, have enabled and promoted the applications of mobile brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) in our daily life. Since the brain may behave differently while people are actively situated in ecologically-valid environments versus highly-controlled laboratory environments, it remains unclear how well the current laboratory-oriented BCI demonstrations can be translated into operational BCIs for users with naturalistic movements. Understanding inherent links between natural human behaviors and brain activities is the key to ensuring the applicability and stability of mobile BCIs. This study aims to assess the quality of steady-state visual-evoked potentials (SSVEPs), which is one of promising channels for functioning BCI systems, recorded using a mobile EEG system under challenging recording conditions, e.g., walking. To systematically explore the effects of walking locomotion on the SSVEPs, this study instructed subjects to stand or walk on a treadmill running at speeds of 1, 2, and 3 mile (s) per hour (MPH) while concurrently perceiving visual flickers (11 and 12 Hz). Empirical results of this study showed that the SSVEP amplitude tended to deteriorate when subjects switched from standing to walking. Such SSVEP suppression could be attributed to the walking locomotion, leading to distinctly deteriorated SSVEP detectability from standing (84.87 ± 13.55%) to walking (1 MPH: 83.03 ± 13.24%, 2 MPH: 79.47 ± 13.53%, and 3 MPH: 75.26 ± 17.89%). These findings not only demonstrated the applicability and limitations of SSVEPs recorded from freely behaving humans in realistic environments, but also provide useful methods and techniques for boosting the translation of the BCI technology from laboratory demonstrations to practical applications

A review on brain computer interfaces: contemporary achievements and future goals towards movement restoration

Restoration of motor functions of patients with loss of mobility constitutes a yet unsolved medical problem, but also one of the most prominent research areas of neurosciences. Among suggested solutions, Brain Computer Interfaces have received much attention. BCI systems use electric, magnetic or metabolic brain signals to allow for control of external devices, such as wheelchairs, computers or neuroprosthetics, by disabled patients. Clinical applications includespinal cord injury, cerebrovascular accident rehabilitation, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis patients. Various BCI systems are under re­search, facilitated by numerous measurement techniques including EEG, fMRI, MEG, nIRS and ECoG, each with its own advantages and disadvantages.Current research effort focuses on brain signal identification and extraction. Virtual Reality environments are also deployed for patient training. Wheelchair or robotic arm control has showed up as the first step towards actual mobility restoration. The next era of BCI research is envisaged to lie along the transmission of brain signals to systems that will control and restore movement of disabled patients via mechanical appendixes or directly to the muscle system by neurosurgical means

Challenges and opportunities for the future of Brain-Computer Interface in neurorehabilitation

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) provide a unique technological solution to circumvent the damaged motor system. For neurorehabilitation, the BCI can be used to translate neural signals associated with movement intentions into tangible feedback for the patient, when they are unable to generate functional movement themselves. Clinical interest in BCI is growing rapidly, as it would facilitate rehabilitation to commence earlier following brain damage and provides options for patients who are unable to partake in traditional physical therapy. However, substantial challenges with existing BCI implementations have prevented its widespread adoption. Recent advances in knowledge and technology provide opportunities to facilitate a change, provided that researchers and clinicians using BCI agree on standardisation of guidelines for protocols and shared efforts to uncover mechanisms. We propose that addressing the speed and effectiveness of learning BCI control are priorities for the field, which may be improved by multimodal or multi-stage approaches harnessing more sensitive neuroimaging technologies in the early learning stages, before transitioning to more practical, mobile implementations. Clarification of the neural mechanisms that give rise to improvement in motor function is an essential next step towards justifying clinical use of BCI. In particular, quantifying the unknown contribution of non-motor mechanisms to motor recovery calls for more stringent control conditions in experimental work. Here we provide a contemporary viewpoint on the factors impeding the scalability of BCI. Further, we provide a future outlook for optimal design of the technology to best exploit its unique potential, and best practices for research and reporting of findings

BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACE: COMPARISON OF TWO CONTROL MODES TO DRIVE A VIRTUAL ROBOT

A Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) is a system that enables communication and control that is not based on muscular movements, but on brain activity. Some of these systems are based on discrimination of different mental tasks; usually they match the number of mental tasks to the number of control commands. Previous research at the University of Málaga (UMABCI) have proposed a BCI system to freely control an external device, letting the subjects choose among several navigation commands using only one active mental task (versus any other mental activity). Although the navigation paradigm proposed in this system has been proved useful for continuous movements, if the user wants to move medium or large distances, he/she needs to keep the effort of the MI task in order to keep the command. In this way, the aim of this work was to test a navigation paradigm based on the brain-switch mode for ‘forward’ command. In this mode, the subjects used the mental task to switch their state on /off: they stopped if they were moving forward and vice versa. Initially, twelve healthy and untrained subjects participated in this study, but due to a lack of control in previous session, only four subjects participated in the experiment, in which they had to control a virtual robot using two paradigms: one based on continuous mode and another based on switch mode. Preliminary results show that both paradigms can be used to navigate through virtual environments, although with the first one the times needed to complete a path were notably lower

Analysis of sensorimotor rhythms based on lower-limbs motor imagery for brain-computer interface

Over recent years significant advancements in the field of assistive technologies have been observed. One of the paramount needs for the development and advancement that urged researchers to contribute in the field other than congenital or diagnosed chronic disorders, is the rising number of affectees from accidents, natural calamity (due to climate change), or warfare, worldwide resulting in spinal cord injuries (SCI), neural disorder, or amputation (interception) of limbs, that impede a human to live a normal life. In addition to this, more than ten million people in the world are living with some form of handicap due to the central nervous system (CNS) disorder, which is precarious. Biomedical devices for rehabilitation are the center of research focus for many years. For people with lost motor control, or amputation, but unscathed sensory control, instigation of control signals from the source, i.e. electrophysiological signals, is vital for seamless control of assistive biomedical devices. Control signals, i.e. motion intentions, arouse    in the sensorimotor cortex of the brain that can be detected using invasive or non-invasive modality. With non-invasive modality, the electroencephalography (EEG) is used to record these motion intentions encoded in electrical activity of the cortex, and are deciphered to recognize user intent for locomotion. They are further transferred to the actuator, or end effector of the assistive device for control purposes. This can be executed via the brain-computer interface (BCI) technology. BCI is an emerging research field that establishes a real-time bidirectional connection between the human brain and a computer/output device. Amongst its diverse applications, neurorehabilitation to deliver sensory feedback and brain controlled biomedical devices for rehabilitation are most popular. While substantial literature on control of upper-limb assistive technologies controlled via BCI is there, less is known about the lower-limb (LL) control of biomedical devices for navigation or gait assistance via BCI. The types  of EEG signals compatible with an independent BCI are the oscillatory/sensorimotor rhythms (SMR) and event-related potential (ERP). These signals have successfully been used in BCIs for navigation control of assistive devices. However, ERP paradigm accounts for a voluminous setup for stimulus presentation to the user during operation of BCI assistive device. Contrary to this, the SMR does not require large setup for activation of cortical activity; it instead depends on the motor imagery (MI) that is produced synchronously or asynchronously by the user. MI is a covert cognitive process also termed kinaesthetic motor imagery (KMI) and elicits clearly after rigorous training trials, in form of event-related desynchronization (ERD) or synchronization (ERS), depending on imagery activity or resting period. It usually comprises of limb movement tasks, but is not limited to it in a BCI paradigm. In order to produce detectable features that correlate to the user¿s intent, selection of cognitive task is an important aspect to improve the performance of a BCI. MI used in BCI predominantly remains associated with the upper- limbs, particularly hands, due to the somatotopic organization of the motor cortex. The hand representation area is substantially large, in contrast to the anatomical location of the LL representation areas in the human sensorimotor cortex. The LL area is located within the interhemispheric fissure, i.e. between the mesial walls of both hemispheres of the cortex. This makes it arduous to detect EEG features prompted upon imagination of LL. Detailed investigation of the ERD/ERS in the mu and beta oscillatory rhythms during left and right LL KMI tasks is required, as the user¿s intent to walk is of paramount importance associated to everyday activity. This is an important area of research, followed by the improvisation of the already existing rehabilitation system that serves the LL affectees. Though challenging, solution to these issues is also imperative for the development of robust controllers that follow the asynchronous BCI paradigms to operate LL assistive devices seamlessly. This thesis focusses on the investigation of cortical lateralization of ERD/ERS in the SMR, based on foot dorsiflexion KMI and knee extension KMI separately. This research infers the possibility to deploy these features in real-time BCI by finding maximum possible classification accuracy from the machine learning (ML) models. EEG signal is non-stationary, as it is characterized by individual-to-individual and trial-to-trial variability, and a low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), which is challenging. They are high in dimension with relatively low number of samples available for fitting ML models to the data. These factors account for ML methods that were developed into the tool of choice  to analyse single-trial EEG data. Hence, the selection of appropriate ML model for true detection of class label with no tradeoff of overfitting is crucial. The feature extraction part of the thesis constituted of testing the band-power (BP) and the common spatial pattern (CSP) methods individually. The study focused on the synchronous BCI paradigm. This was to ensure the exhibition of SMR for the possibility of a practically viable control system in a BCI. For the left vs. right foot KMI, the objective was to distinguish the bilateral tasks, in order to use them as unilateral commands in a 2-class BCI for controlling/navigating a robotic/prosthetic LL for rehabilitation. Similar was the approach for left-right knee KMI. The research was based on four main experimental studies. In addition to the four studies, the research is also inclusive of the comparison of intra-cognitive tasks within the same limb, i.e. left foot vs. left knee and right foot vs. right knee tasks, respectively (Chapter 4). This added to another novel contribution towards the findings based on comparison of different tasks within the same LL. It provides basis to increase the dimensionality of control signals within one BCI paradigm, such as a BCI-controlled LL assistive device with multiple degrees of freedom (DOF) for restoration of locomotion function. This study was based on analysis of statistically significant mu ERD feature using BP feature extraction method. The first stage of this research comprised of the left vs. right foot KMI tasks, wherein the ERD/ERS that elicited in the mu-beta rhythms were analysed using BP feature extraction method (Chapter 5). Three individual features, i.e. mu ERD, beta ERD, and beta ERS were investigated on EEG topography and time-frequency (TF) maps, and average time course of power percentage, using the common average reference and bipolar reference methods. A comparative study was drawn for both references to infer the optimal method. This was followed by ML, i.e. classification of the three feature vectors (mu ERD, beta ERD, and beta ERS), using linear discriminant analysis (LDA), support vector machine (SVM), and k-nearest neighbour (KNN) algorithms, separately. Finally, the multiple correction statistical tests were done, in order to predict maximum possible classification accuracy amongst all paradigms for the most significant feature. All classifier models were supported with the statistical techniques of k-fold cross validation and evaluation of area under receiver-operator characteristic curves (AUC-ROC) for prediction of the true class label. The highest classification accuracy of 83.4% ± 6.72 was obtained with KNN model for beta ERS feature. The next study was based on enhancing the classification accuracy obtained from previous study. It was based on using similar cognitive tasks as study in Chapter 5, however deploying different methodology for feature extraction and classification procedure. In the second study, ERD/ERS from mu and beta rhythms were extracted using CSP and filter bank common spatial pattern (FBCSP) algorithms, to optimize the individual spatial patterns (Chapter 6). This was followed by ML process, for which the supervised logistic regression (Logreg) and LDA were deployed separately. Maximum classification accuracy resulted in 77.5% ± 4.23 with FBCSP feature vector and LDA model, with a maximum kappa coefficient of 0.55 that is in the moderate range of agreement between the two classes. The left vs. right foot discrimination results were nearly same, however the BP feature vector performed better than CSP. The third stage was based on the deployment of novel cognitive task of left vs. right knee extension KMI. Analysis of the ERD/ERS in the mu-beta rhythms was done for verification of cortical lateralization via BP feature vector (Chapter 7). Similar to Chapter 5, in this study the analysis of ERD/ERS features was done on the EEG topography and TF maps, followed by the determination of average time course and peak latency of feature occurrence. However, for this study, only mu ERD and beta ERS features were taken into consideration and the EEG recording method only comprised of common average reference. This was due to the established results from the foot study earlier, in Chapter 5, where beta ERD features showed less average amplitude. The LDA and KNN classification algorithms were employed. Unexpectedly, the left vs. right knee KMI reflected the highest accuracy of 81.04% ± 7.5 and an AUC-ROC = 0.84, strong enough to be used in a real-time BCI as two independent control features. This was using KNN model for beta ERS feature. The final study of this research followed the same paradigm as used in Chapter 6, but for left vs. right knee KMI cognitive task (Chapter 8). Primarily this study aimed at enhancing the resulting accuracy from Chapter 7, using CSP and FBCSP methods with Logreg and LDA models respectively. Results were in accordance with those of the already established foot KMI study, i.e. BP feature vector performed better than the CSP. Highest classification accuracy of 70.00% ± 2.85 with kappa score of 0.40 was obtained with Logreg using FBCSP feature vector. Results stipulated the utilization of ERD/ERS in mu and beta bands, as independent control features for discrimination of bilateral foot or the novel bilateral knee KMI tasks. Resulting classification accuracies implicate that any 2-class BCI, employing unilateral foot, or knee KMI, is suitable for real-time implementation. In conclusion, this thesis demonstrates the possible EEG pre-processing, feature extraction and classification methods to instigate a real-time BCI from the conducted studies. Following this, the critical aspects of latency in information transfer rate, SNR, and tradeoff between dimensionality and overfitting needs to be taken care of, during design of real-time BCI controller. It also highlights that there is a need for consensus over the development of standardized methods of cognitive tasks for MI based BCI. Finally, the application of wireless EEG for portable assistance is essential as it will contribute to lay the foundations of the development of independent asynchronous BCI based on SMR

BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACE: COMPARISON OF TWO CONTROL MODES TO DRIVE A VIRTUAL ROBOT

A Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) is a system that enables communication and control that is not based on muscular movements, but on brain activity. Some of these systems are based on discrimination of different mental tasks; usually they match the number of mental tasks to the number of control commands. Previous research at the University of Málaga (UMABCI) have proposed a BCI system to freely control an external device, letting the subjects choose among several navigation commands using only one active mental task (versus any other mental activity). Although the navigation paradigm proposed in this system has been proved useful for continuous movements, if the user wants to move medium or large distances, he/she needs to keep the effort of the MI task in order to keep the command. In this way, the aim of this work was to test a navigation paradigm based on the brain-switch mode for ‘forward’ command. In this mode, the subjects used the mental task to switch their state on /off: they stopped if they were moving forward and vice versa. Initially, twelve healthy and untrained subjects participated in this study, but due to a lack of control in previous session, only four subjects participated in the experiment, in which they had to control a virtual robot using two paradigms: one based on continuous mode and another based on switch mode. Preliminary results show that both paradigms can be used to navigate through virtual environments, although with the first one the times needed to complete a path were notably lower