224 research outputs found

    Three-Dimensional Dose Prediction for Lung IMRT Patients with Deep Neural Networks: Robust Learning from Heterogeneous Beam Configurations

    Full text link
    The use of neural networks to directly predict three-dimensional dose distributions for automatic planning is becoming popular. However, the existing methods only use patient anatomy as input and assume consistent beam configuration for all patients in the training database. The purpose of this work is to develop a more general model that, in addition to patient anatomy, also considers variable beam configurations, to achieve a more comprehensive automatic planning with a potentially easier clinical implementation, without the need of training specific models for different beam settings

    Sub-second photon dose prediction via transformer neural networks

    Full text link
    Fast dose calculation is critical for online and real time adaptive therapy workflows. While modern physics-based dose algorithms must compromise accuracy to achieve low computation times, deep learning models can potentially perform dose prediction tasks with both high fidelity and speed. We present a deep learning algorithm that, exploiting synergies between Transformer and convolutional layers, accurately predicts broad photon beam dose distributions in few milliseconds. The proposed improved Dose Transformer Algorithm (iDoTA) maps arbitrary patient geometries and beam information (in the form of a 3D projected shape resulting from a simple ray tracing calculation) to their corresponding 3D dose distribution. Treating the 3D CT input and dose output volumes as a sequence of 2D slices along the direction of the photon beam, iDoTA solves the dose prediction task as sequence modeling. The proposed model combines a Transformer backbone routing long-range information between all elements in the sequence, with a series of 3D convolutions extracting local features of the data. We train iDoTA on a dataset of 1700 beam dose distributions, using 11 clinical volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans (from prostate, lung and head and neck cancer patients with 194-354 beams per plan) to assess its accuracy and speed. iDoTA predicts individual photon beams in ~50 milliseconds with a high gamma pass rate of 97.72% (2 mm, 2%). Furthermore, estimating full VMAT dose distributions in 6-12 seconds, iDoTA achieves state-of-the-art performance with a 99.51% (2 mm, 2%) pass rate. Offering the sub-second speed needed in online and real-time adaptive treatments, iDoTA represents a new state of the art in data-driven photon dose calculation. The proposed model can massively speed-up current photon workflows, reducing calculation times from few minutes to just a few seconds

    Deep-Learning-Based Dose Predictor for Glioblastoma-Assessing the Sensitivity and Robustness for Dose Awareness in Contouring

    Full text link
    External beam radiation therapy requires a sophisticated and laborious planning procedure. To improve the efficiency and quality of this procedure, machine-learning models that predict these dose distributions were introduced. The most recent dose prediction models are based on deep-learning architectures called 3D U-Nets that give good approximations of the dose in 3D almost instantly. Our purpose was to train such a 3D dose prediction model for glioblastoma VMAT treatment and test its robustness and sensitivity for the purpose of quality assurance of automatic contouring. From a cohort of 125 glioblastoma (GBM) patients, VMAT plans were created according to a clinical protocol. The initial model was trained on a cascaded 3D U-Net. A total of 60 cases were used for training, 15 for validation and 20 for testing. The prediction model was tested for sensitivity to dose changes when subject to realistic contour variations. Additionally, the model was tested for robustness by exposing it to a worst-case test set containing out-of-distribution cases. The initially trained prediction model had a dose score of 0.94 Gy and a mean DVH (dose volume histograms) score for all structures of 1.95 Gy. In terms of sensitivity, the model was able to predict the dose changes that occurred due to the contour variations with a mean error of 1.38 Gy. We obtained a 3D VMAT dose prediction model for GBM with limited data, providing good sensitivity to realistic contour variations. We tested and improved the model's robustness by targeted updates to the training set, making it a useful technique for introducing dose awareness in the contouring evaluation and quality assurance process

    Dose Prediction with Deep Learning for Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy: Model Adaptation to Different Treatment Planning Practices

    Full text link
    This work aims to study the generalizability of a pre-developed deep learning (DL) dose prediction model for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for prostate cancer and to adapt the model to three different internal treatment planning styles and one external institution planning style. We built the source model with planning data from 108 patients previously treated with VMAT for prostate cancer. For the transfer learning, we selected patient cases planned with three different styles from the same institution and one style from a different institution to adapt the source model to four target models. We compared the dose distributions predicted by the source model and the target models with the clinical dose predictions and quantified the improvement in the prediction quality for the target models over the source model using the Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) of 10% to 100% isodose volumes and the dose-volume-histogram (DVH) parameters of the planning target volume and the organs-at-risk. The source model accurately predicts dose distributions for plans generated in the same source style but performs sub-optimally for the three internal and one external target styles, with the mean DSC ranging between 0.81-0.94 and 0.82-0.91 for the internal and the external styles, respectively. With transfer learning, the target model predictions improved the mean DSC to 0.88-0.95 and 0.92-0.96 for the internal and the external styles, respectively. Target model predictions significantly improved the accuracy of the DVH parameter predictions to within 1.6%. We demonstrated model generalizability for DL-based dose prediction and the feasibility of using transfer learning to solve this problem. With 14-29 cases per style, we successfully adapted the source model into several different practice styles. This indicates a realistic way to widespread clinical implementation of DL-based dose prediction

    3D Dose-Driven, Automatic VMAT Machine Parameter Generation with Deep Learning

    Get PDF
    Purpose/Objective(s): Recent research efforts utilizing knowledge-based treatment planning for the prediction of 3D radiation dose distributions from planning structure sets have achieved positive results. Most ongoing efforts to generate deliverable plans from the predicted doses rely on full inverse optimizations using dose-volume histogram (DVH) objectives derived from these doses. In this study, we aim to leverage deep learning (DL) to rapidly generate machine delivery parameters for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) from predicted desired doses. Materials/Methods: Data of 50 previously treated patients at our institution with prostate adenocarcinoma who received definitive radiotherapy were retrospectively obtained. All plans were generated with a one-arc VMAT technique, with conventional fractionation (78 Gy in 39 fx or 79.2 Gy in 44 fx to the prostate gland +/- seminal vesicles). A multi-task U-Net was constructed: it takes the 2D projections of the 3D dose and planning structures as inputs, and it predicts the numerical multi-leaf collimator (MLC) sequence and weights for the 178 control points. Five cases were randomly selected for testing only, and the remaining 45 formed the training set. The algorithm was implemented in Python 3.8 with PyTorch 1.7 as the DL framework. Model training was performed on a GPU. The DL-predicted plans underwent further inverse optimization with the 3D-dose-derived DVH objectives, utilizing only the last step of the Photon Optimizer (PO) in a treatment planning system. The optimization time and plan quality were compared to plans generated with one full PO optimization with the same objectives and clinical plans (all normalized to D95%=100% Rx dose). Results: The DL model was trained for 200 epochs. On average, DL-predicted plans could be optimized in 22% (range, 18-26%) of the time required for full optimization plans. Dosimetric comparison (Table 1) demonstrated that the quality of the DL-predicted plans was comparable with clinical plans and full optimization plans, but the DL-predicted plans tended to have increased dose inhomogeneity within the PTVs. Conclusion: We demonstrated the feasibility of rapidly generating deliverable VMAT plans from desired 3D doses with deep learning. Further work is needed to improve PTV dose homogeneity and generalize the method to multi-arc VMAT delivery

    Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy

    Get PDF
    Artificial intelligence (AI) has great potential to transform the clinical workflow of radiotherapy. Since the introduction of deep neural networks, many AI-based methods have been proposed to address challenges in different aspects of radiotherapy. Commercial vendors have started to release AI-based tools that can be readily integrated to the established clinical workflow. To show the recent progress in AI-aided radiotherapy, we have reviewed AI-based studies in five major aspects of radiotherapy including image reconstruction, image registration, image segmentation, image synthesis, and automatic treatment planning. In each section, we summarized and categorized the recently published methods, followed by a discussion of the challenges, concerns, and future development. Given the rapid development of AI-aided radiotherapy, the efficiency and effectiveness of radiotherapy in the future could be substantially improved through intelligent automation of various aspects of radiotherapy

    An atlas-based method to predict three-dimensional dose distributions for cancer patients who receive radiotherapy

    Get PDF
    Due to the complexity of advanced radiotherapy techniques, treatment planning process is usually time consuming and plan quality can vary considerably among planners and institutions. It is also impractical to generate all possible treatment plans based on available radiotherapy techniques and select the best option for a specific patient. Automatic dose prediction will be very helpful in these situations, while there were a few studies of three-dimensional (3D) dose prediction for patients who received radiotherapy. The purpose of this work was to develop a novel atlas-based method to predict 3D dose prediction and to evaluate its performance. Previously treated nineteen left-sided post-mastectomy breast cancer patients and sixteen prostate cancer patients were included in this study. One patient was arbitrarily chosen as the reference for each type of cancer and all the remaining patients\u27 computed tomography (CT) images and contours were aligned to it using deformable image registration (DIR). Deformable vector field (DVF) for each patient i (DVFi-ref) was used to deform the original 3D dose matrix of that patient. CT scan of a test patient was also registered with the same reference patient using DIR and both direct DVF (DVFtest-ref) and inverse DVF () were derived. Similarity of atlas patients to the test patient was determined based on the similarity of DVFtest-ref to atlas DVFs (DVFi-ref) and appropriate weighting factors were calculated. Patients\u27 doses in the atlas were deformed again using to transform them from the reference patient\u27s coordinates to the test patient\u27s coordinates and the final 3D dose distribution for the test patient was predicted by summing the weighted individual 3D dose distributions. Performance of our method was evaluated and the results revealed that the proposed method was able to predict the 3D dose distributions accurately. The mean dose difference between clinical and predicted 3D dose distributions were 0.9 ± 1.1 Gy and 1.9 ± 1.2 Gy for breast and prostate plans. The proposed dose prediction method can be used to improve planning quality and facilitate plan comparisons
    corecore