1,021 research outputs found
Addiction in context
The dissertation provides a comprehensive exploration of the interplay between social and cultural factors in substance use, specifically focusing on alcohol use disorder (AUD) and cannabis use disorder (CUD). It begins by introducing the concept of social plasticity, which posits that adolescents' susceptibility to AUD is influenced by their heightened sensitivity to their social environment, but this sensitivity increases the potential for recovery in the transition to adulthood.A series of studies delves into how social cues impact alcohol craving and consumption. One study using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) investigated social alcohol cue reactivity and its relationship to social drinking behavior, revealing increased craving but no significant change in brain activity in response to alcohol cues. Another fMRI study compared social processes in alcohol cue reactivity between adults and adolescents, showing age-related differences in how social attunement affects drinking behavior. Shifting focus to cannabis, this dissertation discusses how cultural factors, including norms, legal policies, and attitudes, influence cannabis use and processes underlying CUD. The research presented examined various facets of cannabis use, including how cannabinoid concentrations in hair correlate with self-reported use, the effects of cannabis and cigarette co-use on brain reactivity, and cross-cultural differences in CUD between Amsterdam and Texas. Furthermore, the evidence for the relationship between cannabis use, CUD, and mood disorders is reviewed, suggesting a bidirectional relationship, with cannabis use potentially preceding the onset of bipolar disorder and contributing to the development and worse prognosis of mood disorders and mood disorders leading to more cannabis use
Der Visual Sensory Memory Task: Integration von neuem Wissen und Untersuchung zur Mustertrennung anhand einer neuen Gedächtnisaufgabe mit abstrakten und ähnlichkeits-anpassbaren Stimuli
In classical memory tasks, it is often necessary to distinguish between old and new stimuli. Recent studies also use tasks in which stimuli appear that are similar to, but not identical with, familiar stimuli, so-called lures. These tasks were designed to study two postulated sub-functions of memory: Pattern separation and pattern completion. The stimuli are usually pictures of everyday objects, but for which different prior knowledge may influence memory performance and the degree of similarity between two pictures cannot be determined objectively. The Visual Sensory Memory Task (VSMT) developed by Kaernbach and colleagues is a visual pink noise-based task that can be used to construct lure stimuli with precisely quantifiable degrees of similarity. In this dissertation, existing test procedures and the newly developed test are first compared to investigate the validity of the VSMT. Then, the performance of the VSMT is transferred to different age groups to study the reliability of the VSMT, and finally, the neural processes in the hippocampus during memory retrieval are examined. The results of the first experiment demonstrate the validity of the VSMT as a neuropsychological measurement tool to study declarative memory. The second experiment showed that it is possible to perform the VSMT with different age groups and that the performance thereby shows the same profile in all age groups. In addition, it showed the expected better performance of young adults compared to four- to five-year-old children as well as adults over 65 years of age. The results of the third experiment confirm existing findings about the dentate gyrus as the central region of pattern separation and about the CA3 region as the core for the dynamic balance between pattern separation and pattern completion. Furthermore, they point to an involvement of the subiculum in pattern separation
Discovering Causal Relations and Equations from Data
Physics is a field of science that has traditionally used the scientific
method to answer questions about why natural phenomena occur and to make
testable models that explain the phenomena. Discovering equations, laws and
principles that are invariant, robust and causal explanations of the world has
been fundamental in physical sciences throughout the centuries. Discoveries
emerge from observing the world and, when possible, performing interventional
studies in the system under study. With the advent of big data and the use of
data-driven methods, causal and equation discovery fields have grown and made
progress in computer science, physics, statistics, philosophy, and many applied
fields. All these domains are intertwined and can be used to discover causal
relations, physical laws, and equations from observational data. This paper
reviews the concepts, methods, and relevant works on causal and equation
discovery in the broad field of Physics and outlines the most important
challenges and promising future lines of research. We also provide a taxonomy
for observational causal and equation discovery, point out connections, and
showcase a complete set of case studies in Earth and climate sciences, fluid
dynamics and mechanics, and the neurosciences. This review demonstrates that
discovering fundamental laws and causal relations by observing natural
phenomena is being revolutionised with the efficient exploitation of
observational data, modern machine learning algorithms and the interaction with
domain knowledge. Exciting times are ahead with many challenges and
opportunities to improve our understanding of complex systems.Comment: 137 page
Decisions, decisions, decisions: the development and plasticity of reinforcement learning, social and temporal decision making in children
Human decision-making is the flexible way people respond to their environment, take actions, and plan toward long-term goals. It is commonly thought that humans rely on distinct decision-making systems, which are either more habitual and reflexive or deliberate and calculated. How we make decisions can provide insight into our social functioning, mental health and underlying psychopathology, and ability to consider the consequences of our actions. Notably, the ability to make appropriate, habitual or deliberate decisions depending on the context, here referred to as metacontrol, remains underexplored in developmental samples. This thesis aims to investigate the development of different decision-making mechanisms in middle childhood (ages 5-13) and to illuminate the potential neurocognitive mechanisms underlying value-based decision-making. Using a novel sequential decision-making task, the first experimental chapter presents robust markers of model-based decision-making in childhood (N = 85), which reflects the ability to plan through a sequential task structure, contrary to previous developmental studies. Using the same paradigm, in a new sample via both behavioral (N = 69) and MRI-based measures (N = 44), the second experimental chapter explores the neurocognitive mechanisms that may underlie model-based decision-making and its metacontrol in childhood and links individual differences in inhibition and cortical thickness to metacontrol. The third experimental chapter explores the potential plasticity of social and intertemporal decision-making in a longitudinal executive function training paradigm (N = 205) and initial relationships with executive functions. Finally, I critically discuss the results presented in this thesis and their implications and outline directions for future research in the neurocognitive underpinnings of decision-making during development
Deep generative modelling of the imaged human brain
Human-machine symbiosis is a very promising opportunity for the field of neurology given that the interpretation of the imaged human brain is a trivial feat
for neither entity. However, before machine learning systems can be used in
real world clinical situations, many issues with automated analysis must first be
solved. In this thesis I aim to address what I consider the three biggest hurdles
to the adoption of automated machine learning interpretative systems. For each
issue, I will first elucidate the reader on its importance given the overarching
narratives of both neurology and machine learning, and then showcase my proposed solutions to these issues through the use of deep generative models of the
imaged human brain.
First, I start by addressing what is an uncontroversial and universal sign of intelligence: the ability to extrapolate knowledge to unseen cases. Human neuroradiologists have studied the anatomy of the healthy brain and can therefore,
with some success, identify most pathologies present on an imaged brain, even
without having ever been previously exposed to them. Current discriminative
machine learning systems require vast amounts of labelled data in order to accurately identify diseases. In this first part I provide a generative framework that
permits machine learning models to more efficiently leverage unlabelled data for
better diagnoses with either none or small amounts of labels.
Secondly, I address a major ethical concern in medicine: equitable evaluation
of all patients, regardless of demographics or other identifying characteristics.
This is, unfortunately, something that even human practitioners fail at, making
the matter ever more pressing: unaddressed biases in data will become biases
in the models. To address this concern I suggest a framework through which
a generative model synthesises demographically counterfactual brain imaging
to successfully reduce the proliferation of demographic biases in discriminative
models.
Finally, I tackle the challenge of spatial anatomical inference, a task at the centre
of the field of lesion-deficit mapping, which given brain lesions and associated
cognitive deficits attempts to discover the true functional anatomy of the brain.
I provide a new Bayesian generative framework and implementation that allows
for greatly improved results on this challenge, hopefully, paving part of the road
towards a greater and more complete understanding of the human brain
- …