66,524 research outputs found
Siamese Instance Search for Tracking
In this paper we present a tracker, which is radically different from
state-of-the-art trackers: we apply no model updating, no occlusion detection,
no combination of trackers, no geometric matching, and still deliver
state-of-the-art tracking performance, as demonstrated on the popular online
tracking benchmark (OTB) and six very challenging YouTube videos. The presented
tracker simply matches the initial patch of the target in the first frame with
candidates in a new frame and returns the most similar patch by a learned
matching function. The strength of the matching function comes from being
extensively trained generically, i.e., without any data of the target, using a
Siamese deep neural network, which we design for tracking. Once learned, the
matching function is used as is, without any adapting, to track previously
unseen targets. It turns out that the learned matching function is so powerful
that a simple tracker built upon it, coined Siamese INstance search Tracker,
SINT, which only uses the original observation of the target from the first
frame, suffices to reach state-of-the-art performance. Further, we show the
proposed tracker even allows for target re-identification after the target was
absent for a complete video shot.Comment: This paper is accepted to the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and
Pattern Recognition, 201
A Survey on Metric Learning for Feature Vectors and Structured Data
The need for appropriate ways to measure the distance or similarity between
data is ubiquitous in machine learning, pattern recognition and data mining,
but handcrafting such good metrics for specific problems is generally
difficult. This has led to the emergence of metric learning, which aims at
automatically learning a metric from data and has attracted a lot of interest
in machine learning and related fields for the past ten years. This survey
paper proposes a systematic review of the metric learning literature,
highlighting the pros and cons of each approach. We pay particular attention to
Mahalanobis distance metric learning, a well-studied and successful framework,
but additionally present a wide range of methods that have recently emerged as
powerful alternatives, including nonlinear metric learning, similarity learning
and local metric learning. Recent trends and extensions, such as
semi-supervised metric learning, metric learning for histogram data and the
derivation of generalization guarantees, are also covered. Finally, this survey
addresses metric learning for structured data, in particular edit distance
learning, and attempts to give an overview of the remaining challenges in
metric learning for the years to come.Comment: Technical report, 59 pages. Changes in v2: fixed typos and improved
presentation. Changes in v3: fixed typos. Changes in v4: fixed typos and new
method
What makes for effective detection proposals?
Current top performing object detectors employ detection proposals to guide
the search for objects, thereby avoiding exhaustive sliding window search
across images. Despite the popularity and widespread use of detection
proposals, it is unclear which trade-offs are made when using them during
object detection. We provide an in-depth analysis of twelve proposal methods
along with four baselines regarding proposal repeatability, ground truth
annotation recall on PASCAL, ImageNet, and MS COCO, and their impact on DPM,
R-CNN, and Fast R-CNN detection performance. Our analysis shows that for object
detection improving proposal localisation accuracy is as important as improving
recall. We introduce a novel metric, the average recall (AR), which rewards
both high recall and good localisation and correlates surprisingly well with
detection performance. Our findings show common strengths and weaknesses of
existing methods, and provide insights and metrics for selecting and tuning
proposal methods.Comment: TPAMI final version, duplicate proposals removed in experiment
Why do These Match? Explaining the Behavior of Image Similarity Models
Explaining a deep learning model can help users understand its behavior and
allow researchers to discern its shortcomings. Recent work has primarily
focused on explaining models for tasks like image classification or visual
question answering. In this paper, we introduce Salient Attributes for Network
Explanation (SANE) to explain image similarity models, where a model's output
is a score measuring the similarity of two inputs rather than a classification
score. In this task, an explanation depends on both of the input images, so
standard methods do not apply. Our SANE explanations pairs a saliency map
identifying important image regions with an attribute that best explains the
match. We find that our explanations provide additional information not
typically captured by saliency maps alone, and can also improve performance on
the classic task of attribute recognition. Our approach's ability to generalize
is demonstrated on two datasets from diverse domains, Polyvore Outfits and
Animals with Attributes 2. Code available at:
https://github.com/VisionLearningGroup/SANEComment: Accepted at ECCV 202
- …