67 research outputs found
Advances in Mechanical Systems Dynamics 2020
The fundamentals of mechanical system dynamics were established before the beginning of the industrial era. The 18th century was a very important time for science and was characterized by the development of classical mechanics. This development progressed in the 19th century, and new, important applications related to industrialization were found and studied. The development of computers in the 20th century revolutionized mechanical system dynamics owing to the development of numerical simulation. We are now in the presence of the fourth industrial revolution. Mechanical systems are increasingly integrated with electrical, fluidic, and electronic systems, and the industrial environment has become characterized by the cyber-physical systems of industry 4.0. Within this framework, the status-of-the-art has become represented by integrated mechanical systems and supported by accurate dynamic models able to predict their dynamic behavior. Therefore, mechanical systems dynamics will play a central role in forthcoming years. This Special Issue aims to disseminate the latest research findings and ideas in the field of mechanical systems dynamics, with particular emphasis on novel trends and applications
ΠΡΠΈΠΌΠΈΡΠΈΠ²Ρ Π΄Π²ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠ° Π² Π·Π°Π΄Π°ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ°Π΅ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ Ρ ΠΊΠΈΠ½Π΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ
Automatic trajectory planning is an urgent scientific and technical problem, whose solutions are in demand in many fields: unmanned transportation, robotic logistics, social robotics, etc. Often, when planning a trajectory, it is necessary to consider the fact that the agent (robot, unmanned car, etc.) cannot arbitrarily change its orientation while moving, in other words, it is necessary to consider kinematic constraints when planning. One widespread approach to solving this problem is the approach that relies on the construction of a trajectory from prepared parts, motion primitives, each of which satisfies kinematic constraints. Often, the emphasis in the development of methods implementing this approach is on reducing the combinations of choices in planning (heuristic search), with the set of available primitives itself being regarded as externally defined. In this paper, on the contrary, we aim to investigate and analyze the effect of different available motion primitives on the quality of solving the planning problem with a fixed search algorithm. Specifically, we consider 3 different sets of motion primitives for a wheeled robot with differential drive. As a search algorithm, the A* algorithm well known in artificial intelligence and robotics is used. The solution quality is evaluated by 6 metrics, including planning time, length and curvature of the resulting trajectory. Based on the study, conclusions are made about the factors that have the strongest influence on the planning result, and recommendations are given on the construction of motion primitives, the use of which allows to achieve a balance between the speed of the planning algorithm and the quality of the trajectories found.ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅ ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΠ°Π΅ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ β Π°ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ Π·Π°Π΄Π°ΡΠ°, ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΉ Π²ΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅Π±ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ Π²ΠΎ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΡΡ
: Π±Π΅ΡΠΏΠΈΠ»ΠΎΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΏΠΎΡΡ, ΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½Π°Ρ Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ°, ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠΎΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΈ Ρ.Π΄. ΠΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΠ°Π΅ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎ ΡΡΠΈΡΡΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΡΠΎΡ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡ, ΡΡΠΎ Π°Π³Π΅Π½Ρ (ΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡ, Π±Π΅ΡΠΏΠΈΠ»ΠΎΡΠ½ΡΠΉ Π°Π²ΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠ»Ρ ΠΈ Π΄Ρ.) Π½Π΅ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡΡ ΠΎΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΈ Π΄Π²ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ, Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π°ΠΌΠΈ β Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎ ΡΡΠΈΡΡΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΠΊΠΈΠ½Π΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ. ΠΠ΄Π½ΠΈΠΌ ΠΈΠ· ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠΊΠΎ-ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΠΊ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠΎΠΉ Π·Π°Π΄Π°ΡΠΈ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄, ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠΉΡΡ Π½Π° ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΠ°Π΅ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΠ· Π·Π°ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ°Π³ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ², ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠΈΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ² Π΄Π²ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ, ΠΊΠ°ΠΆΠ΄ΡΠΉ ΠΈΠ· ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΡ
Π² ΡΠ²ΠΎΡ ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π΄Ρ ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅ΡΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΊΠΈΠ½Π΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΌ. ΠΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ, Π°ΠΊΡΠ΅Π½Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ², ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΡΠΈΡ
ΡΡΠΎΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄, Π΄Π΅Π»Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π½Π° ΡΠΎΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π±ΠΎΡΠ° Π²Π°ΡΠΈΠ°Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ (ΡΠ²ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΈΡΠΊ), ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ°ΠΌ Π½Π°Π±ΠΎΡ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΡΠΏΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠΈΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ² ΡΡΠΈΡΠ°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π·Π°Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌ ΠΈΠ·Π²Π½Π΅. Π ΡΡΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ΅, ΠΌΡ Π½Π°ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠΎΡ ΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠΌ ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠΈ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π΄ΠΎΡΡΡΠΏΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠΈΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ² Π΄Π²ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π½Π° ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π·Π°Π΄Π°ΡΠΈ ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΠΈΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΌ Π°Π»Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΌΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΈΡΠΊΠ°. Π ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡ 3 ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π½Π°Π±ΠΎΡΠ° ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠΈΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ² Π΄Π²ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠ° Ρ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ. Π ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅ Π°Π»Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΌΠ° ΠΏΠΎΠΈΡΠΊΠ° ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΈΠ·Π²Π΅ΡΡΠ½ΡΠΉ Π² ΠΈΡΠΊΡΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π»Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ΅ ΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠΎΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ΅ Π°Π»Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΌ A*. ΠΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎ 6 ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΠΌ, Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ°Ρ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ, Π΄Π»ΠΈΠ½Ρ ΠΈ ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²ΠΈΠ·Π½Ρ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΡΠ°Π΅ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ. ΠΠ° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄Π΅Π»Π°ΡΡΡΡ Π²ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΎ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠ°Ρ
, ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΠ²Π°ΡΡΠΈΡ
Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π΅ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π° ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°Ρ ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ, ΠΈ Π΄Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΄Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΡΠΎΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠΈΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ² Π΄Π²ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ, ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ΅Ρ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΡ Π±Π°Π»Π°Π½ΡΠ° ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ ΡΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΡΡ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΡ Π°Π»Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΌΠ° ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠΌ ΠΎΡΡΡΠΊΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΠΌΡΡ
ΡΡΠ°Π΅ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΉ
System Design, Motion Modelling and Planning for a Recon figurable Wheeled Mobile Robot
Over the past ve decades the use of mobile robotic rovers to perform in-situ scienti c investigations on the surfaces of the Moon and Mars has been tremendously in uential in shaping our understanding of these extraterrestrial environments. As robotic missions have evolved there has been a greater desire to explore more unstructured terrain. This has exposed mobility limitations with conventional rover designs such as getting stuck in soft soil or simply not being able to access rugged terrain. Increased mobility and terrain traversability are key requirements when considering designs for next generation planetary rovers. Coupled with these requirements is the need to autonomously navigate unstructured terrain by taking full advantage of increased mobility. To address these issues, a high degree-of-freedom recon gurable platform that is capable of energy intensive legged locomotion in obstacle-rich terrain as well as wheeled locomotion in benign terrain is proposed. The complexities of the planning task that considers the high degree-of-freedom state space of this platform are considerable. A variant of asymptotically optimal sampling-based planners that exploits the presence of dominant sub-spaces within a recon gurable mobile robot's kinematic structure is proposed to increase path quality and ensure platform safety. The contributions of this thesis include: the design and implementation of a highly mobile planetary analogue rover; motion modelling of the platform to enable novel locomotion modes, along with experimental validation of each of these capabilities; the sampling-based HBFMT* planner that hierarchically considers sub-spaces to better guide search of the complete state space; and experimental validation of the planner with the physical platform that demonstrates how the planner exploits the robot's capabilities to uidly transition between various physical geometric con gurations and wheeled/legged locomotion modes
Proceedings of the ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Multibody Dynamics 2015
This volume contains the full papers accepted for presentation at the ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Multibody Dynamics 2015 held in the Barcelona School of Industrial Engineering, Universitat PolitΓ¨cnica de Catalunya, on June 29 - July 2, 2015. The ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Multibody Dynamics is an international meeting held once every two years in a European country. Continuing the very successful series of past conferences that have been organized in Lisbon (2003), Madrid (2005), Milan (2007), Warsaw (2009), Brussels (2011) and Zagreb (2013); this edition will once again serve as a meeting point for the international researchers, scientists and experts from academia, research laboratories and industry working in the area of multibody dynamics. Applications are related to many fields of contemporary engineering, such as vehicle and railway systems, aeronautical and space vehicles, robotic manipulators, mechatronic and autonomous systems, smart structures, biomechanical systems and nanotechnologies. The topics of the conference include, but are not restricted to: β Formulations and Numerical Methods β Efficient Methods and Real-Time Applications β Flexible Multibody Dynamics β Contact Dynamics and Constraints β Multiphysics and Coupled Problems β Control and Optimization β Software Development and Computer Technology β Aerospace and Maritime Applications β Biomechanics β Railroad Vehicle Dynamics β Road Vehicle Dynamics β Robotics β Benchmark ProblemsPostprint (published version
- β¦