78,065 research outputs found

    Multicolumn Networks for Face Recognition

    Full text link
    The objective of this work is set-based face recognition, i.e. to decide if two sets of images of a face are of the same person or not. Conventionally, the set-wise feature descriptor is computed as an average of the descriptors from individual face images within the set. In this paper, we design a neural network architecture that learns to aggregate based on both "visual" quality (resolution, illumination), and "content" quality (relative importance for discriminative classification). To this end, we propose a Multicolumn Network (MN) that takes a set of images (the number in the set can vary) as input, and learns to compute a fix-sized feature descriptor for the entire set. To encourage high-quality representations, each individual input image is first weighted by its "visual" quality, determined by a self-quality assessment module, and followed by a dynamic recalibration based on "content" qualities relative to the other images within the set. Both of these qualities are learnt implicitly during training for set-wise classification. Comparing with the previous state-of-the-art architectures trained with the same dataset (VGGFace2), our Multicolumn Networks show an improvement of between 2-6% on the IARPA IJB face recognition benchmarks, and exceed the state of the art for all methods on these benchmarks.Comment: To appear in BMVC201

    SER-FIQ: Unsupervised Estimation of Face Image Quality Based on Stochastic Embedding Robustness

    Full text link
    Face image quality is an important factor to enable high performance face recognition systems. Face quality assessment aims at estimating the suitability of a face image for recognition. Previous work proposed supervised solutions that require artificially or human labelled quality values. However, both labelling mechanisms are error-prone as they do not rely on a clear definition of quality and may not know the best characteristics for the utilized face recognition system. Avoiding the use of inaccurate quality labels, we proposed a novel concept to measure face quality based on an arbitrary face recognition model. By determining the embedding variations generated from random subnetworks of a face model, the robustness of a sample representation and thus, its quality is estimated. The experiments are conducted in a cross-database evaluation setting on three publicly available databases. We compare our proposed solution on two face embeddings against six state-of-the-art approaches from academia and industry. The results show that our unsupervised solution outperforms all other approaches in the majority of the investigated scenarios. In contrast to previous works, the proposed solution shows a stable performance over all scenarios. Utilizing the deployed face recognition model for our face quality assessment methodology avoids the training phase completely and further outperforms all baseline approaches by a large margin. Our solution can be easily integrated into current face recognition systems and can be modified to other tasks beyond face recognition.Comment: Accepted at CVPR202

    Face Quality Estimation and Its Correlation to Demographic and Non-Demographic Bias in Face Recognition

    Full text link
    Face quality assessment aims at estimating the utility of a face image for the purpose of recognition. It is a key factor to achieve high face recognition performances. Currently, the high performance of these face recognition systems come with the cost of a strong bias against demographic and non-demographic sub-groups. Recent work has shown that face quality assessment algorithms should adapt to the deployed face recognition system, in order to achieve highly accurate and robust quality estimations. However, this could lead to a bias transfer towards the face quality assessment leading to discriminatory effects e.g. during enrolment. In this work, we present an in-depth analysis of the correlation between bias in face recognition and face quality assessment. Experiments were conducted on two publicly available datasets captured under controlled and uncontrolled circumstances with two popular face embeddings. We evaluated four state-of-the-art solutions for face quality assessment towards biases to pose, ethnicity, and age. The experiments showed that the face quality assessment solutions assign significantly lower quality values towards subgroups affected by the recognition bias demonstrating that these approaches are biased as well. This raises ethical questions towards fairness and discrimination which future works have to address.Comment: Accepted at IJCB202

    Evaluation and Understandability of Face Image Quality Assessment

    Get PDF
    Face image quality assessment (FIQA) has been an area of interest to researchers as a way to improve the face recognition accuracy. By filtering out the low quality images we can reduce various difficulties faced in unconstrained face recognition, such as, failure in face or facial landmark detection or low presence of useful facial information. In last decade or so, researchers have proposed different methods to assess the face image quality, spanning from fusion of quality measures to using learning based methods. Different approaches have their own strength and weaknesses. But, it is hard to perform a comparative assessment of these methods without a database containing wide variety of face quality, a suitable training protocol that can efficiently utilize this large-scale dataset. In this thesis we focus on developing an evaluation platfrom using a large scale face database containing wide ranging face image quality and try to deconstruct the reason behind the predicted scores of learning based face image quality assessment methods. Contributions of this thesis is two-fold. Firstly, (i) a carefully crafted large scale database dedicated entirely to face image quality assessment has been proposed; (ii) a learning to rank based large-scale training protocol is devel- oped. Finally, (iii) a comprehensive study of 15 face image quality assessment methods using 12 different feature types, and relative ranking based label generation schemes, is performed. Evalua- tion results show various insights about the assessment methods which indicate the significance of the proposed database and the training protocol. Secondly, we have seen that in last few years, researchers have tried various learning based approaches to assess the face image quality. Most of these methods offer either a quality bin or a score summary as a measure of the biometric quality of the face image. But, to the best of our knowledge, so far there has not been any investigation on what are the explainable reasons behind the predicted scores. In this thesis, we propose a method to provide a clear and concise understanding of the predicted quality score of a learning based face image quality assessment. It is believed that this approach can be integrated into the FBI’s understandable template and can help in improving the image acquisition process by providing information on what quality factors need to be addressed

    Training methods for facial image comparison: a literature review

    Get PDF
    This literature review was commissioned to explore the psychological literature relating to facial image comparison with a particular emphasis on whether individuals can be trained to improve performance on this task. Surprisingly few studies have addressed this question directly. As a consequence, this review has been extended to cover training of face recognition and training of different kinds of perceptual comparisons where we are of the opinion that the methodologies or findings of such studies are informative. The majority of studies of face processing have examined face recognition, which relies heavily on memory. This may be memory for a face that was learned recently (e.g. minutes or hours previously) or for a face learned longer ago, perhaps after many exposures (e.g. friends, family members, celebrities). Successful face recognition, irrespective of the type of face, relies on the ability to retrieve the to-berecognised face from long-term memory. This memory is then compared to the physically present image to reach a recognition decision. In contrast, in face matching task two physical representations of a face (live, photographs, movies) are compared and so long-term memory is not involved. Because the comparison is between two present stimuli rather than between a present stimulus and a memory, one might expect that face matching, even if not an easy task, would be easier to do and easier to learn than face recognition. In support of this, there is evidence that judgment tasks where a presented stimulus must be judged by a remembered standard are generally more cognitively demanding than judgments that require comparing two presented stimuli Davies & Parasuraman, 1982; Parasuraman & Davies, 1977; Warm and Dember, 1998). Is there enough overlap between face recognition and matching that it is useful to look at the literature recognition? No study has directly compared face recognition and face matching, so we turn to research in which people decided whether two non-face stimuli were the same or different. In these studies, accuracy of comparison is not always better when the comparator is present than when it is remembered. Further, all perceptual factors that were found to affect comparisons of simultaneously presented objects also affected comparisons of successively presented objects in qualitatively the same way. Those studies involved judgments about colour (Newhall, Burnham & Clark, 1957; Romero, Hita & Del Barco, 1986), and shape (Larsen, McIlhagga & Bundesen, 1999; Lawson, Bülthoff & Dumbell, 2003; Quinlan, 1995). Although one must be cautious in generalising from studies of object processing to studies of face processing (see, e.g., section comparing face processing to object processing), from these kinds of studies there is no evidence to suggest that there are qualitative differences in the perceptual aspects of how recognition and matching are done. As a result, this review will include studies of face recognition skill as well as face matching skill. The distinction between face recognition involving memory and face matching not involving memory is clouded in many recognition studies which require observers to decide which of many presented faces matches a remembered face (e.g., eyewitness studies). And of course there are other forensic face-matching tasks that will require comparison to both presented and remembered comparators (e.g., deciding whether any person in a video showing a crowd is the target person). For this reason, too, we choose to include studies of face recognition as well as face matching in our revie
    corecore