4,210 research outputs found

    Bounding sequence extremal functions with formations

    Get PDF
    An (r,s)(r, s)-formation is a concatenation of ss permutations of rr letters. If uu is a sequence with rr distinct letters, then let Ex(u,n)\mathit{Ex}(u, n) be the maximum length of any rr-sparse sequence with nn distinct letters which has no subsequence isomorphic to uu. For every sequence uu define fw(u)\mathit{fw}(u), the formation width of uu, to be the minimum ss for which there exists rr such that there is a subsequence isomorphic to uu in every (r,s)(r, s)-formation. We use fw(u)\mathit{fw}(u) to prove upper bounds on Ex(u,n)\mathit{Ex}(u, n) for sequences uu such that uu contains an alternation with the same formation width as uu. We generalize Nivasch's bounds on Ex((ab)t,n)\mathit{Ex}((ab)^{t}, n) by showing that fw((12…l)t)=2t−1\mathit{fw}((12 \ldots l)^{t})=2t-1 and Ex((12…l)t,n)=n21(t−2)!α(n)t−2±O(α(n)t−3)\mathit{Ex}((12\ldots l)^{t}, n) =n2^{\frac{1}{(t-2)!}\alpha(n)^{t-2}\pm O(\alpha(n)^{t-3})} for every l≥2l \geq 2 and t≥3t\geq 3, such that α(n)\alpha(n) denotes the inverse Ackermann function. Upper bounds on Ex((12…l)t,n)\mathit{Ex}((12 \ldots l)^{t} , n) have been used in other papers to bound the maximum number of edges in kk-quasiplanar graphs on nn vertices with no pair of edges intersecting in more than O(1)O(1) points. If uu is any sequence of the form avav′aa v a v' a such that aa is a letter, vv is a nonempty sequence excluding aa with no repeated letters and v′v' is obtained from vv by only moving the first letter of vv to another place in vv, then we show that fw(u)=4\mathit{fw}(u)=4 and Ex(u,n)=Θ(nα(n))\mathit{Ex}(u, n) =\Theta(n\alpha(n)). Furthermore we prove that fw(abc(acb)t)=2t+1\mathit{fw}(abc(acb)^{t})=2t+1 and Ex(abc(acb)t,n)=n21(t−1)!α(n)t−1±O(α(n)t−2)\mathit{Ex}(abc(acb)^{t}, n) = n2^{\frac{1}{(t-1)!}\alpha(n)^{t-1}\pm O(\alpha(n)^{t-2})} for every t≥2t\geq 2.Comment: 25 page

    Time Minimal Trajectories for a Spin 1/2 Particle in a Magnetic Field

    Full text link
    In this paper we consider the minimum time population transfer problem for the zz-component of the spin of a (spin 1/2) particle driven by a magnetic field, controlled along the x axis, with bounded amplitude. On the Bloch sphere (i.e. after a suitable Hopf projection), this problem can be attacked with techniques of optimal syntheses on 2-D manifolds. Let (−E,E)(-E,E) be the two energy levels, and ∣Ω(t)∣≤M|\Omega(t)|\leq M the bound on the field amplitude. For each couple of values EE and MM, we determine the time optimal synthesis starting from the level −E-E and we provide the explicit expression of the time optimal trajectories steering the state one to the state two, in terms of a parameter that can be computed solving numerically a suitable equation. For M/E<<1M/E<<1, every time optimal trajectory is bang-bang and in particular the corresponding control is periodic with frequency of the order of the resonance frequency ωR=2E\omega_R=2E. On the other side, for M/E>1M/E>1, the time optimal trajectory steering the state one to the state two is bang-bang with exactly one switching. Fixed EE we also prove that for M→∞M\to\infty the time needed to reach the state two tends to zero. In the case M/E>1M/E>1 there are time optimal trajectories containing a singular arc. Finally we compare these results with some known results of Khaneja, Brockett and Glaser and with those obtained by controlling the magnetic field both on the xx and yy directions (or with one external field, but in the rotating wave approximation). As byproduct we prove that the qualitative shape of the time optimal synthesis presents different patterns, that cyclically alternate as M/E→0M/E\to0, giving a partial proof of a conjecture formulated in a previous paper.Comment: 31 pages, 10 figures, typos correcte

    Forbidden subposet problems for traces of set families

    Get PDF
    In this paper we introduce a problem that bridges forbidden subposet and forbidden subconfiguration problems. The sets F1,F2,…,F∣P∣F_1,F_2, \dots,F_{|P|} form a copy of a poset PP, if there exists a bijection i:P→{F1,F2,…,F∣P∣}i:P\rightarrow \{F_1,F_2, \dots,F_{|P|}\} such that for any p,p′∈Pp,p'\in P the relation p<Pp′p<_P p' implies i(p)⊊i(p′)i(p)\subsetneq i(p'). A family F\mathcal{F} of sets is \textit{PP-free} if it does not contain any copy of PP. The trace of a family F\mathcal{F} on a set XX is F∣X:={F∩X:F∈F}\mathcal{F}|_X:=\{F\cap X: F\in \mathcal{F}\}. We introduce the following notions: F⊆2[n]\mathcal{F}\subseteq 2^{[n]} is ll-trace PP-free if for any ll-subset L⊆[n]L\subseteq [n], the family F∣L\mathcal{F}|_L is PP-free and F\mathcal{F} is trace PP-free if it is ll-trace PP-free for all l≤nl\le n. As the first instances of these problems we determine the maximum size of trace BB-free families, where BB is the butterfly poset on four elements a,b,c,da,b,c,d with a,b<c,da,b<c,d and determine the asymptotics of the maximum size of (n−i)(n-i)-trace Kr,sK_{r,s}-free families for i=1,2i=1,2. We also propose a generalization of the main conjecture of the area of forbidden subposet problems
    • …
    corecore