347 research outputs found

    Linear bounds on matrix extremal functions using visibility hypergraphs

    Full text link
    The 0-1 matrix A contains a 0-1 matrix M if some submatrix of A can be transformed into M by changing some ones to zeroes. If A does not contain M, then A avoids M. Let ex(n,M) be the maximum number of ones in an n x n 0-1 matrix that avoids M, and let ex_k(m,M) be the maximum number of columns in a 0-1 matrix with m rows that avoids M and has at least k ones in every column. A method for bounding ex(n,M) by using bounds on the maximum number of edges in bar visibility graphs was introduced in (R. Fulek, Discrete Mathematics 309, 2009). By using a similar method with bar visibility hypergraphs, we obtain linear bounds on the extremal functions of other forbidden 0-1 matrices.Comment: 11 pages, 4 figure

    Extremal problems in ordered graphs

    Full text link
    In this thesis we consider ordered graphs (that is, graphs with a fixed linear ordering on their vertices). We summarize and further investigations on the number of edges an ordered graph may have while avoiding a fixed forbidden ordered graph as a subgraph. In particular, we take a step toward confirming a conjecture of Pach and Tardos regarding the number of edges allowed when the forbidden pattern is a tree by establishing an upper bound for a particular ordered graph for which existing techniques have failed. We also generalize a theorem of Geneson by establishing an upper bound on the number of edges allowed if the forbidden graphs fit a generalized notion of a matching.Comment: Thesis for Master Degree, Simon Fraser Universit

    Ordered and convex geometric trees with linear extremal function

    Full text link
    The extremal functions ex(n,F)ex_{\rightarrow}(n,F) and ex_{\cir}(n,F) for ordered and convex geometric acyclic graphs FF have been extensively investigated by a number of researchers. Basic questions are to determine when ex(n,F)ex_{\rightarrow}(n,F) and ex_{\cir}(n,F) are linear in nn, the latter posed by Bra\ss-K\'arolyi-Valtr in 2003. In this paper, we answer both these questions for every tree FF. We give a forbidden subgraph characterization for a family T\cal T of ordered trees with kk edges, and show that ex(n,T)=(k1)n(k2)ex_{\rightarrow}(n,T) = (k - 1)n - {k \choose 2} for all nk+1n \geq k + 1 when TTT \in {\cal T} and ex(n,T)=Ω(nlogn)ex_{\rightarrow}(n,T) = \Omega(n\log n) for T∉TT \not\in {\cal T}. We also describe the family of the convex geometric trees with linear Tur\' an number and show that for every convex geometric tree FF not in this family, ex_{\cir}(n,F)= \Omega(n\log \log n).Comment: 14 pages, 9 figures. Same as the first version. Only metadata has been change

    Sharp Bounds on Davenport-Schinzel Sequences of Every Order

    Full text link
    One of the longest-standing open problems in computational geometry is to bound the lower envelope of nn univariate functions, each pair of which crosses at most ss times, for some fixed ss. This problem is known to be equivalent to bounding the length of an order-ss Davenport-Schinzel sequence, namely a sequence over an nn-letter alphabet that avoids alternating subsequences of the form ababa \cdots b \cdots a \cdots b \cdots with length s+2s+2. These sequences were introduced by Davenport and Schinzel in 1965 to model a certain problem in differential equations and have since been applied to bounding the running times of geometric algorithms, data structures, and the combinatorial complexity of geometric arrangements. Let λs(n)\lambda_s(n) be the maximum length of an order-ss DS sequence over nn letters. What is λs\lambda_s asymptotically? This question has been answered satisfactorily (by Hart and Sharir, Agarwal, Sharir, and Shor, Klazar, and Nivasch) when ss is even or s3s\le 3. However, since the work of Agarwal, Sharir, and Shor in the mid-1980s there has been a persistent gap in our understanding of the odd orders. In this work we effectively close the problem by establishing sharp bounds on Davenport-Schinzel sequences of every order ss. Our results reveal that, contrary to one's intuition, λs(n)\lambda_s(n) behaves essentially like λs1(n)\lambda_{s-1}(n) when ss is odd. This refutes conjectures due to Alon et al. (2008) and Nivasch (2010).Comment: A 10-page extended abstract will appear in the Proceedings of the Symposium on Computational Geometry, 201

    Forbidden induced subposets of given height

    Full text link
    Let PP be a partially ordered set. The function \mbox{La}^{\#}(n,P) denotes the size of the largest family F2[n]\mathcal{F}\subset 2^{[n]} that does not contain an induced copy of PP. It was proved by Methuku and P\'alv\"olgyi that there exists a constant CPC_{P} (depending only on PP) such that \mbox{La}^{\#}(n,P). However, the order of the constant CPC_{P} following from their proof is typically exponential in P|P|. Here, we show that if the height of the poset is constant, this can be improved. We show that for every positive integer hh there exists a constant chc_{h} such that if PP has height at most hh, then \mbox{La}^{\#}(n,P)\leq |P|^{c_{h}}\binom{n}{\lfloor n/2\rfloor}. Our methods also immediately imply that similar bounds hold in grids as well. That is, we show that if F[k]n\mathcal{F}\subset [k]^{n} such that F\mathcal{F} does not contain an induced copy of PP and n2Pn\geq 2|P|, then FPchw,|\mathcal{F}|\leq |P|^{c_{h}}w, where ww is the width of [k]n[k]^{n}. A small part of our proof is to partition 2[n]2^{[n]} (or [k]n[k]^{n}) into certain fixed dimensional grids of large sides. We show that this special partition can be used to derive bounds in a number of other extremal set theoretical problems and their generalizations in grids, such as the size of families avoiding weak posets, Boolean algebras, or two distinct sets and their union. This might be of independent interest.Comment: 17 pages, 2 figure

    Almost all permutation matrices have bounded saturation functions

    Get PDF
    Saturation problems for forbidden graphs have been a popular area of research for many decades, and recently Brualdi and Cao initiated the study of a saturation problem for 0-1 matrices. We say that 0-1 matrix AA is saturating for the forbidden 0-1 matrix PP if AA avoids PP but changing any zero to a one in AA creates a copy of PP. Define sat(n,P)sat(n, P) to be the minimum possible number of ones in an n×nn \times n 0-1 matrix that is saturating for PP. Fulek and Keszegh proved that for every 0-1 matrix PP, either sat(n,P)=O(1)sat(n, P) = O(1) or sat(n,P)=Θ(n)sat(n, P) = \Theta(n). They found two 0-1 matrices PP for which sat(n,P)=O(1)sat(n, P) = O(1), as well as infinite families of 0-1 matrices PP for which sat(n,P)=Θ(n)sat(n, P) = \Theta(n). Their results imply that sat(n,P)=Θ(n)sat(n, P) = \Theta(n) for almost all k×kk \times k 0-1 matrices PP. Fulek and Keszegh conjectured that there are many more 0-1 matrices PP such that sat(n,P)=O(1)sat(n, P) = O(1) besides the ones they found, and they asked for a characterization of all permutation matrices PP such that sat(n,P)=O(1)sat(n, P) = O(1). We affirm their conjecture by proving that almost all k×kk \times k permutation matrices PP have sat(n,P)=O(1)sat(n, P) = O(1). We also make progress on the characterization problem, since our proof of the main result exhibits a family of permutation matrices with bounded saturation functions

    On the Extremal Functions of Acyclic Forbidden 0--1 Matrices

    Full text link
    The extremal theory of forbidden 0--1 matrices studies the asymptotic growth of the function Ex(P,n)\mathrm{Ex}(P,n), which is the maximum weight of a matrix A{0,1}n×nA\in\{0,1\}^{n\times n} whose submatrices avoid a fixed pattern P{0,1}k×lP\in\{0,1\}^{k\times l}. This theory has been wildly successful at resolving problems in combinatorics, discrete and computational geometry, structural graph theory, and the analysis of data structures, particularly corollaries of the dynamic optimality conjecture. All these applications use acyclic patterns, meaning that when PP is regarded as the adjacency matrix of a bipartite graph, the graph is acyclic. The biggest open problem in this area is to bound Ex(P,n)\mathrm{Ex}(P,n) for acyclic PP. Prior results have only ruled out the strict O(nlogn)O(n\log n) bound conjectured by Furedi and Hajnal. It is consistent with prior results that P.Ex(P,n)nlog1+o(1)n\forall P. \mathrm{Ex}(P,n)\leq n\log^{1+o(1)} n, and also consistent that ϵ>0.P.Ex(P,n)n2ϵ\forall \epsilon>0.\exists P. \mathrm{Ex}(P,n) \geq n^{2-\epsilon}. In this paper we establish a stronger lower bound on the extremal functions of acyclic PP. Specifically, we give a new construction of relatively dense 0--1 matrices with Θ(n(logn/loglogn)t)\Theta(n(\log n/\log\log n)^t) 1s that avoid an acyclic XtX_t. Pach and Tardos have conjectured that this type of result is the best possible, i.e., no acyclic PP exists for which Ex(P,n)n(logn)ω(1)\mathrm{Ex}(P,n)\geq n(\log n)^{\omega(1)}

    Formations and generalized Davenport-Schinzel sequences

    Full text link
    An (r,s)(r, s)-formation is a concatenation of ss permutations of rr distinct letters. We define the function Fr,s(n)F_{r, s}(n) to be the maximum possible length of a sequence with nn distinct letters that avoids all (r,s)(r, s)-formations and has every rr consecutive letters distinct, and we define the function Fr,s(n,m)F_{r, s}(n, m) to be the maximum possible length of a sequence with nn distinct letters that avoids all (r,s)(r, s)-formations and can be partitioned into mm blocks of distinct letters. (Nivasch, 2010) and (Pettie, 2015) found bounds on Fr,s(n)F_{r, s}(n) for all fixed r,s>0r, s > 0, but no exact values were known, even for s=2s = 2. We prove that Fr,2(n,m)=n+(r1)(m1)F_{r,2}(n, m) = n+(r-1)(m-1), Fr,3(n,m)=2n+(r1)(m2)F_{r,3}(n, m) = 2n+(r-1)(m-2), Fr,2(n)=(nr)r+2r1F_{r,2}(n) = (n-r)r+2r-1, and Fr,3(n)=2(nr)r+3r1F_{r,3}(n) = 2(n-r)r+3r-1, improving on bounds of (Klazar, 1992), (Nivasch, 2010), and (Pettie, 2015). In addition, we improve an upper bound of (Klazar, 2002). For any sequence uu, define Ex(u,n)Ex(u, n) to be the maximum possible length of a sequence with nn distinct letters that avoids uu and has every rr consecutive letters distinct, where rr is the number of distinct letters in uu. Klazar proved that Ex((a1ar)2,n)<(2n+1)LEx((a_1 \dots a_r)^2, n) < (2n+1)L, where L=Ex((a1ar)2,K1)+1L = Ex((a_1 \dots a_r)^2,K-1)+1 and K=(r1)4+1K = (r-1)^4 + 1. Here we prove that K=(r1)4+1K = (r-1)^4 + 1 in Klazar's bound can be replaced with K=(r1)3+1K = (r-1)^3+1. We also prove a conjecture from (Geneson et al., 2014) by showing for t1t \geq 1 that Ex(abc(acb)tabc,n)=n21t!α(n)t±O(α(n)t1)Ex(a b c (a c b)^{t} a b c, n) = n 2^{\frac{1}{t!}\alpha(n)^{t} \pm O(\alpha(n)^{t-1})}. In addition, we prove that Ex(abcacb(abc)tacb,n)=n21(t+1)!α(n)t+1±O(α(n)t)Ex(a b c a c b (a b c)^{t} a c b, n) = n 2^{\frac{1}{(t+1)!}\alpha(n)^{t+1} \pm O(\alpha(n)^{t})} for t1t \geq 1. Furthermore, we extend the equalities Fr,2(n,m)=n+(r1)(m1)F_{r,2}(n, m) = n+(r-1)(m-1) and Fr,3(n,m)=2n+(r1)(m2)F_{r,3}(n, m) = 2n+(r-1)(m-2) to formations in dd-dimensional 0-1 matrices, sharpening a bound from (Geneson, 2019)

    A generalization of the K\H{o}v\'{a}ri-S\'{o}s-Tur\'{a}n theorem

    Full text link
    We present a new proof of the K\H{o}v\'{a}ri-S\'{o}s-Tur\'{a}n theorem that ex(n,Ks,t)=O(n21/t)ex(n, K_{s,t}) = O(n^{2-1/t}) for s,t2s, t \geq 2. The new proof is elementary, avoiding the use of convexity. For any dd-uniform hypergraph HH, let exd(n,H)ex_d(n,H) be the maximum possible number of edges in an HH-free dd-uniform hypergraph on nn vertices. Let KH,tK_{H, t} be the (d+1)(d+1)-uniform hypergraph obtained from HH by adding tt new vertices v1,,vtv_1, \dots, v_t and replacing every edge ee in E(H)E(H) with tt edges e{v1},,e{vt}e \cup \left\{v_1\right\},\dots, e \cup \left\{v_t\right\} in E(KH,t)E(K_{H, t}). If HH is the 11-uniform hypergraph on ss vertices with ss edges, then KH,t=Ks,tK_{H, t} = K_{s, t}. We prove that exd+1(n,KH,t)=O(exd(n,H)1/tnd+1d/t+tnd)ex_{d+1}(n,K_{H,t}) = O(ex_d(n, H)^{1/t} n^{d+1-d/t} + t n^d) for any dd-uniform hypergraph HH with at least two edges such that exd(n,H)=o(nd)ex_d(n, H) = o(n^d). Thus exd+1(n,KH,t)=O(nd+11/t)ex_{d+1}(n,K_{H,t}) = O(n^{d+1-1/t}) for any dd-uniform hypergraph HH with at least two edges such that exd(n,H)=O(nd1)ex_d(n, H) = O(n^{d-1}), which implies the K\H{o}v\'{a}ri-S\'{o}s-Tur\'{a}n theorem in the d=1d = 1 case. This also implies that exd+1(n,KH,t)=O(nd+11/t)ex_{d+1}(n, K_{H,t}) = O(n^{d+1-1/t}) when HH is a dd-uniform hypergraph with at least two edges in which all edges are pairwise disjoint, which generalizes an upper bound proved by Mubayi and Verstra\"{e}te (JCTA, 2004). We also obtain analogous bounds for 0-1 matrix Tur\'{a}n problems

    Sharper bounds and structural results for minimally nonlinear 0-1 matrices

    Get PDF
    The extremal function ex(n,P)ex(n, P) is the maximum possible number of ones in any 0-1 matrix with nn rows and nn columns that avoids PP. A 0-1 matrix PP is called minimally non-linear if ex(n,P)=ω(n)ex(n, P) = \omega(n) but ex(n,P)=O(n)ex(n, P') = O(n) for every PP' that is contained in PP but not equal to PP. Bounds on the maximum number of ones and the maximum number of columns in a minimally non-linear 0-1 matrix with kk rows were found in (CrowdMath, 2018). In this paper, we improve the bound on the maximum number of ones in a minimally non-linear 0-1 matrix with kk rows from 5k35k-3 to 4k44k-4. As a corollary, this improves the upper bound on the number of columns in a minimally non-linear 0-1 matrix with kk rows from 4k24k-2 to 4k44k-4. We also prove that there are not more than four ones in the top and bottom rows of a minimally non-linear matrix and that there are not more than six ones in any other row of a minimally non-linear matrix. Furthermore, we prove that if a minimally non-linear 0-1 matrix has ones in the same row with exactly dd columns between them, then within these columns there are at most 2d12d-1 rows above and 2d12d-1 rows below with ones
    corecore